Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of social networks in knowledge creation

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

It is a basic principle of literature that social networks allow their members to access new knowledge. The exchange and combination of knowledge that these networks provide is widely recognized as an antecedent of knowledge creation. By reviewing the main contributions of literature that link social networks to knowledge creation and innovation, we intend to explore how different types of networks, as well as the different dimensions of their social capital, influence innovative performance. An exhaustive coverage of prior literature has been carried out in order to locate all the relevant previous work. The analysis shows up the complex relationship between social networks’ diverse facets and their members’ capacity to create knowledge. The strategies defined for knowledge searching can condition which is the most appropriate type of network. In turn, the type of network can determine the most suitable structural and relational embeddedness. Hence, the decision to participate in social networks requires taking into consideration the different environments of these networks and also the singular aspects they present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida P and Phene A (2004) Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal 25 (8–9), 847–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L and Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arikan AT (2009) Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Academy of Management Review 34 (4), 658–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk J and Magnusson M (2009) Where do good innovation ideas come from? Exploring the influence of network connectivity on innovation idea quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (6), 662–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk J, Di Vincenzo F, Magnusson M and Mascia D (2011) The impact of social capital on ideation. Industry and Innovation 18 (6), 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP and Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management 29 (6), 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, and London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabello-Medina C, López-Cabrales A and Valle-Cabrera R (2011) Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (4), 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldo A (2007) Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal 28 (6), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey S, Lawson B and Crause D (2011) Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management 29 (4), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona-Lavado A, Cuevas-Rodríguez G and Cabello Medina C (2010) Social and organizational capital: building the context for innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 39 (4), 681–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanueva C and Gallego A (2010) Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 12 (1), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M-H and Wang M-C (2008) Social networks and a new venture's innovative capability: the role of trust within entrepreneurial teams. R&D Management 38 (3), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu YTH (2009) How network competence and network location influence innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 24 (1), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho H-J and Pucik V (2005) Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability and market value. Strategic Management Journal 26 (6), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W and Levinthal D (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99 (397), 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W and Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administration Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement), S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins CJ and Smith KG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal 49 (3), 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor KR and Prahalad CK (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 7 (5), 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R and Jonard N (2009) Knowledge portfolios and the organization of innovation network. Academy of Management Review 34 (2), 320–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brentani U (2001) Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (3), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj C and Parkhe A (2006) Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy Management Review 31 (3), 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1993) Post-capitalist Society. Harper-Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH and Singh HI (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliaster A and Schloderer F (2010) Dyadic ties among employees: empirical analysis of creative performance and efficiency. Human Relations 63 (10), 1513–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic DC and Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal 19 (12), 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittelman M (2007) Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organization Science 18 (4), 724–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996a) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996b) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 (4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A and Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21 (4), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon A and Sutton R (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (4), 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat CE and Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24 (19), 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hislop D (2005) The effect of network size on intra-network knowledge processes. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 3 (4), 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu S-H, Wang Y-C and Tzeng S-F (2007) The source of innovation: boundary spanner. Total Quality Management 18 (10), 1133–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C and Racherla P (2008) Visual representation of knowledge networks: a social network analysis of hospitality research domain. International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y-C and Wu Y-CJ (2010) Intellectual capital and knowledge productivity: the Taiwan biotech industry. Management Decision 48 (4), 580–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen AC (2007) Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: the case of NUMMI and General Motors. Strategic Management Journal 29 (4), 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen AC and Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy Management Review 30 (1), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GR and George JM (1998) The experience and evolution of trust: implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review 23 (3), 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachra A and White RE (2008) Know-how transfer: the role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management Journal 29 (4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S-C, Morris SS and Snell S (2007) Relational archetypes, organizational learning and value creation: extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review 32 (1), 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila R and Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (6), 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto A and Waajakoski J (2010) Linking social capital to organizational growth. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 8 (1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijkuit B and van den Ende J (2010) With a little help from our colleagues: a longitudinal study of social networks for innovation. Organization Studies 31 (04), 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim BY and Oh H (2004) How do hotel firms obtain a competitive advantage? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 16 (1), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerle J, Cress U and Held C (2010) The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 8 (1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B (2000) The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koka BR and Prescott JE (2008) Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 29 (6), 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe M, Martín X and Domoto H (2003) Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal 24 (4), 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros XA, Cheng TCE and Lai K-H (2007) ‘Black-box’ and ‘gray-box’ supplier integration in product development: antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size. Journal of Operations Management 25 (4), 847–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer J, Leenders RThAJ and Van Engelen JML (2005) Informal contacts and performance in innovation teams. International Journal of Manpower 26 (6), 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry R, Amara N and Lamari M (2002) Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting & Social Change 69 (7), 681–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau C-M (2011) Team and organizational resources, strategic orientations, and firm performance in a transitional economy. Journal of Business Research 64 (12), 1344–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K and Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2010) Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks. Organization Science 21 (4), 804–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman SA and Rumelt R (1982) Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics 13 (2), 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science 2 (1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer I, Bartsch V and Ebers M (2011) The value of intra-organizational social capital: how it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies 32 (2), 157–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily B and Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20 (12), 1133–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen MA and Cannella Jr. AA (2004) Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal 47 (5), 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DJ, Fern MJ and Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2), 308–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina J (1999) Dialogue: on the relational view. Academy of Management Review 24 (2), 184–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Morales FX, Ares Vázquez A and Molina Puertas CA (2010) Capital social e innovación en los distritos industriales: una aplicación a los casos de la cerámica y del mueble. Revista de Treball, Economia i Societat 55, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Morales FX and Martínez-Fernández MT (2009) Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal 30 (9), 1013–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Morales FX and Martínez-Fernández MT (2010) Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management 48 (2), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran P (2005) Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (12), 1129–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mors ML (2010) Innovation in a global consulting firm: when the problem is too much diversity. Strategic Management Journal 31 (8), 841–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Oxley JE and Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen BB and Nielsen S (2009) Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: an empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies 46 (6), 1031–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto MJ and Santamaría Ll (2007) The importance of diverse collaborative network for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27 (3), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Toyama R (2003) The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 1 (1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the Tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1), 100–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovich K (2003) The evolution and transformation of a tourism destination network: the Waitomo Caves, New Zealand. Tourism Management 24 (2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Luño A, Cabello Medina C, Carmona Lavado A and Cuevas Rodríguez G (2011) How social capital and knowledge affect innovation. Journal of Business Research 64 (12), 1369–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy Management Journal 49 (1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phene A, Fladmoe-Lindquist K and Marsh L (2006) Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal 27 (4), 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee JH and Ji H (2011) How to further exploit social capital: an empirical investigation of three dimensions of social capital and their contributions to individual performance. Asian Business and Management 10 (4), 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirolo L and Presutti M (2010) The impact of social capital on the start-ups’ performance growth. Journal of Small Business Management 48 (2), 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan S and Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal 25 (6), 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost K (2011) The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation. Research Policy 40 (4), 588–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman N and Saives A-L (2005) Indirect networks: an intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management 35 (2), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG, Collins CJ and Clark KD (2005) Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy Management Journal 48 (2), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender JC (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring external stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (5), 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41 (4), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S and Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W-Y, Chang M-L and Cheng C-W (2008) Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R&D Management 38 (3), 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J-T (2007) Knowledge sharing: investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture. Tourism Management 28 (2), 530–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J-T and Wan C-S (2004) Advancing organizational effectiveness and knowledge management implementation. Tourism Management 25 (5), 593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young GJ, Charns MP and Shortell SM (2001) Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system. Strategic Management Journal 22 (10), 935–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander U and Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science 6 (1), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain

    Julia Nieves & Javier Osorio

Authors
  1. Julia Nieves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier Osorio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Nieves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nieves, J., Osorio, J. The role of social networks in knowledge creation. Knowl Manage Res Pract 11, 62–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.28

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.28

Keywords

Search

Navigation