Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

External knowledge acquisition and innovation output: an analysis of the moderating effect of internal knowledge transfer

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

Numerous studies highlight the advantages of accessing knowledge from outside the firm as a means of enhancing the firm's innovation efforts. However, access to external knowledge is not without organisational problems, including rejection of external knowledge by firm members or difficulties in applying such knowledge to the firm's operations. Based on the knowledge management literature, this paper analyses the conditions within the firm that favour external knowledge acquisition, and focuses on internal transfer as a key variable for the successful integration of external knowledge in the innovation process. Our results demonstrate that internal knowledge transfer intensifies the influence of external knowledge acquisition on innovation output. Specifically, achieving an environment within the firm that favours knowledge integration into the innovation process depends to a large extent on the willingness of knowledge users to share and assimilate knowledge, and on the existence of formal mechanisms such as coordination and communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja G and Katila R (2004) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G and Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7), 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida P, Phene A and Grant R (2003) Innovation and knowledge management: scanning, sourcing and integration. In Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Easterby-Smith M and Lyles MA, Eds), pp 356–371, Blackwell Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili A (2008) Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: motivators, barriers and, enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10 (4), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L, McEvily B and Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49 (4), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayona C, García M and Huerta E (2001) Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy 30 (8), 1289–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM (1995) EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software, Inc, Encino, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierly P and Hämäläinen T (1995) Organizational learning and strategy. Scandinavian Management Journal 11 (3), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw J and Fey CF (2005) External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management 31 (4), 597–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachos D, Kostopoulos K, Soderquist KE and Prastacos G (2007) Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (5), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL and Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20 (2), 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caloghirou Y, Kastelli I and Tsakanikas A (2004) Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation 24 (1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo Ordaz C, García Cruz J and Sousa Ginel E (2010) Knowledge sharing: enablers and its influence on innovation. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 42 (Marzo), 113–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo Ordaz C, García Cruz J, Sousa Ginel E and Valle Cabrera R (2011) The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (7), 1442–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1955) The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology 60 (4), 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil ST, Calantone RJ and Zhao Y (2003) Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 18 (1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy B, McEvily S, Doz Y and Devaki R (2003) Knowledge management and competitive advantage. In Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Easterby-Smith M and Lyles MA, Eds), pp 356–323, Blackwell Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJ (2004) The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management 34 (3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, (Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W and West J, Eds), pp 1–12, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H and Crowther AK (2006) Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management 36 (3), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darr E, Argote L and Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Management Science 41 (11), 1750–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Prusak L (1998) Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis RF (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3 (2), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM and Santos FM (2002) Knowledge-based view: a new theory of strategy? In Handbook of Strategy and Management (Pettigrew A, Thomas H and Whittington R, Eds), pp 139–164, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • George G, Zahra SA, Wheatley KK and Khan R (2001) The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance. A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (2), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S, Korine H and Szulanski G (1994) Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science 40 (1), 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresov C and Stephens C (1993) The context of interunit influence attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (2), 252–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimpe C and Sofka W (2009) Search patterns and absorptive capacity: low- and high- technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy 38 (3), 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK and Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge management's social dimension: lessons from nucor steel. Sloan Management Review 42 (1), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn J (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganisational modes of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14 (5), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31 (4), 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1), 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT, Mors ML and Løvås B (2005) Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal 48 (5), 776–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon A and Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (4), 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henard DH and McFadyen MA (2006) R&D knowledge is power. Research Technology Management 49 (3), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes DG and Postrel S (1999) Shared knowledge, ‘glitches’, and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal 20 (9), 837–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells J, James A and Malik K (2003) The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes and dynamic change. R&D Management 33 (4), 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Davison R and Gu J (2008) Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25 (3), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipe M (2003) Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review 2 (4), 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JJP, Van den Bosch FAJ and Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal 48 (6), 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog KG (2000) Latent Variable Scores and their Uses. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, Du Toit S and Du Toit M (2003) LISREL 8: New Statistical Features Third printing with revisions. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila R and Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (6), 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki M, et al (2000) Communication as a determinant of organizational innovation. R&D Management 30 (1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koka BR and Prescott JE (2002) Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal 23 (9), 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (2), 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerström K and Andersson M (2003) Creating and sharing knowledge within a transnational team – the development of a global business system. Journal of World Business 38 (2), 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K and Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen A and Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2), 224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D and Deschamps I (1988) Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science 34 (10), 1252–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao LF (2008) Knowledge-sharing in R&D departments: a social power and social exchange theory perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19 (10), 1881–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U and Ernst H (2006) Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome. R&D Management 36 (4), 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles MA and Salk JE (1996) Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (5), 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily SK and Chakravarthy B (2002) The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 23 (4), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen MA and Cannella AA (2004) Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal 47 (5), 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JE and Argote L (2002) Group processes in organizational contexts. In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology (Hogg MA and Tindale RS, Eds), pp 603–627, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DJ, Fern MJ and Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2), 308–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva D (2005) HRM practices and MNC knowledge transfer. Personnel Review 34 (1), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva D, Pedersen T, Björkman I, Fey CF and Park HJ (2003) MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (6), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimoto K and Matsuda K (2007) Informal communication support media for encouraging knowledge-sharing and creating in a community. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 6 (3), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R and Konno N (2000) SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33 (1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OCDE (2005) Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edn, OECD/EC, Paris.

  • Ortín Ángel P and Santamaría Sánchez L (2009) R&D managers’ adaptation of firms’ HRM practices. R&D Management 39 (3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh M and Frey BS (2000) Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science 11 (5), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan SL and Scarbrough H (1999) Knowledge management in practice: an exploratory case study. Technology Analysis Strategic Management 11 (3), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pla J and Alegre J (2007) Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry. International Business Review 16 (3), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKensie SB, Lee JY and Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM and Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo DI and Ahmed PK (2006) Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management 36 (5), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaría L, Nieto MJ and Barge-Gil A (2010) The relevance of different open innovation strategies for R&D performers. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresas 45 (diciembre), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M and Jobe LA (2001) Codification and tacitness as knowledge management strategies: an empirical exploration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (1), 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segarra-Ciprés M, Bou-Llusar JC and Roca-Puig V (2012) Exploring and exploiting external knowledge: the effect of sector and firm technological intensity. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 14 (2), 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler-de Alwis R and Hartmann E (2008) The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Holden T and Schmidt RA (2001) From knowledge theory to management practice: towards an integrated approach. Information Processing and Management 37 (2), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simón Elorz K (2003) Las empresas de base tecnológica: motor de futuro en la economía del conocimiento. In La creación de empresas de base tecnológica. Una experiencia práctica. CEIN, ANCES, Asociación Nacional de Centros Europeos de Innovación Españoles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG, Collins CJ and Clark KD (2005) Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal 48 (2), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow CC and Hrebiniak LG (1980) Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (2), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples DS, Greenaway K and Mckeen J (2001) Opportunities for research about managing the knowledge-based enterprise. International Journal of Management Reviews 3 (1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma HK and Lyles MA (2000) Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 21 (8), 831–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock GN, Greis NP and Fischer WA (2001) Absorptive capacity and new product development. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam M and Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48 (3), 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Bresnen M, Newell S and Robertson M (2007) The object of knowledge: the role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations 60 (12), 1809–1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (2003) Sticky Knowledge. Barriers to Knowing in the Firm. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tether BS (2002) Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy 31 (6), 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M and Heron P (2005) The difference a manager can make: organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (3), 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M and Heron P (2006) Relational quality and innovative performance in R&D based science and technology firms. Human Resource Management Journal 16 (1), 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG and Fleischer M (1990) The Process of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortoriello M and Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: the role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal 53 (1), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W (2002) Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 13 (2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KH and Wang JC (2009) External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: an analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey. Research Policy 38 (3), 518–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urgal B, Quintás MA and Tomé RA (2011) Technological knowledge, innovation capability and innovative performance: the moderating role of the behavioural environment of the firm. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresas 14, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hooff B and Ridder JA (2004) Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management 8 (6), 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk R, Jansen JJP and Lyles MA (2008) Inter- and Intra-organizational knowledge transfer: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies 45 (4), 830–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC (1994) Cooperative research in a newly industrialized country: Taiwan. Research Policy 23 (6), 697–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Singh K, Koh CP and Tong W (2001) Determinants and outcomes of knowledge transfer: a study of MNCs in China. Paper Presented to The Academy of Management Conference, AOM, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright SC and Clark KB (1992) Revolutionizing Product Development –Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu WP (2008) Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: the mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies 45 (1), 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA and George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27 (2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zárraga C and Bonache J (2005) The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams. Organization Studies 26 (5), 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out as a part of a research project (ref. P1-1A2008-16) subsidized by the Bancaixa Foundation. It was also supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (ref. ECO2008-01674 and ref. ECO ECO2011-25809).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain

    Mercedes Segarra-Ciprés, Vicente Roca-Puig & Juan Carlos Bou-Llusar

Authors
  1. Mercedes Segarra-Ciprés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vicente Roca-Puig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Carlos Bou-Llusar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mercedes Segarra-Ciprés.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Scales used to measure the research model constructs
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segarra-Ciprés, M., Roca-Puig, V. & Bou-Llusar, J. External knowledge acquisition and innovation output: an analysis of the moderating effect of internal knowledge transfer. Knowl Manage Res Pract 12, 203–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.55

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.55

Keywords

Search

Navigation