Knowledge Management Research & Practice

FIGURES AND TABLES

FROM:

Using peer-to-peer technology for collaborative knowledge management: concepts, frameworks and research issues

Saurabh Gupta and Robert Bostrom

BACK TO ARTICLE
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 1.

Knowledge management process (adapted from Alavi & Leidner, 2001).

Full figure and legend (28K)
Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 2.

Collaboration model (adapted from Schrage, 1997).

Full figure and legend (7K)
Table 1 - C//S compared to P2P in the KM process - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Table 1 - C/S compared to P2P in the KM process.

Full table
Table 2 - Comparison of client//server and peer-to-peer technology for CKM - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Table 2 - Comparison of client/server and peer-to-peer technology for CKM.

Full table
Table 3 - Levels of collaborative knowledge management - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Table 3 - Levels of collaborative knowledge management.

Full table
Table 4 - Summary of research issues - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Table 4 - Summary of research issues.

Full table
BACK TO ARTICLE