TABLE 1
FROM:
Integrating knowledge transfer and computer-mediated communication: categorizing barriers and possible responses
David G Schwartz
BACK TO ARTICLETable 1. Barriers by category
| Source |
|---|
| 1. Ease of transfer |
| a. Stickiness at initiation |
| b. Stickiness at implementation |
| c. Stickiness at ramp-up |
| 2. Ability to transfer |
| 3. Willingness to initiate transfer, propensity to share |
| a. Acknowledgement and attribution |
| b. Disseminative capacity |
| c. Interpersonal connection |
| d. Motivation of the source |
| 4. Awareness of need |
| 5. Ambiguity of knowledge |
| 6. Available time/Access |
| 7. Stickiness at integration |
| 8. Motivation |
| Recipient |
| 9. Awareness of availability |
| 10. Reliability of the source |
| 11. Motivation |
| 12. Available time/Access |
| 13. Ambiguity of knowledge |
| 14. Degree of conjecture |
| 15. Absorptive capacity |
| 16. Retentive capacity |
| Organization |
| 17. Organizational context |
| 18. Organizational design |
| 19. Motivation/reward system |
| 20. Available time. |
| 21. Nature of relationship between source and recipient. |
