Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a method to disseminate knowledge from the post project review

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

In this paper we review several issues associated with post project review and dissemination of knowledge in information technology projects. We reflect on our practice of coaching project teams. In identifying the role of social pressure in forming teams’ perception of their performance, we suggest what could potentially be an interesting and fruitful avenue of future research on an approach to post project review and dissemination of knowledge in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen ES, Grude KV, Haug T, Katagiri M and Turner JR (2004) Goal Directed Project Management, 3rd edn, Kogan Page, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1982) Reasoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational, 1st edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1993) Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change, 1st edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C and Schön DA (1978) Organizational Learning Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AC, Jensen PJ and Kolb DA (2005) Conversation as experiential learning. Management Learning 36 (4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berends H (2005) Exploring knowledge sharing: moves, problem solving and justification. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 3 (2), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL and Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh MC, Pearce CL and Kohles JC (2006) The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21 (4), 296–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje DM (1991) Consulting and change in the storytelling organisation. Journal of Organizational Change Management 4 (3), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis RE (2006) An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective. Journal of Management Development 25 (7), 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organization Science 2 (1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science 12 (2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke NJ, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA and Stout R (2000) Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors 42, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC (2003) Framing for learning: lessons in successful technology implementation. California Management Review 45 (2), 34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichman RG, Keil M and Tiwana A (2005) Beyond valuation: ‘Options Thinking’ in IT project management. California Management Review 47 (2), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan MJ and Keil M (2003) The user–developer communication process: a critical case study. Information Systems Journal 13 (1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG and Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR and Wageman R (2005) A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review 30 (2), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ET (1987) Self discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2 (1), 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabri M (2004) Team feedback based on dialogue: implications for change management. Journal of Management Development 23 (2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML and Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy 94 (4), 822–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman RJ, McAndrews J and Wang Y (2000) Opening the ‘Black Box’ of network externalities in network adoption. Information Systems Research 11 (1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan A and Turner JR (2001) Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning 32 (1), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JH (2008) Some directions for research in knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6, 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliem RL (2004) Leading High Performance Projects. J. Ross Pub, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki JL, Desselles ML and Bowman ED (1989) Definitely not a breeze: extending an operant model of effective supervision to teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (3), 522–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koners U and Goffin K (2007) Learning from postproject reviews: a cross-case analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (3), 242–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotnour T (1999) A learning framework for project management. Project Management Journal 30 (2), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JP (2003) The Project Manager's Pocket Survival Guide. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingham T (2004) Developing a measure of conversational learning in work teams. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

  • Marsh SJ and Stock GN (2006) Creating dynamic capability: the role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (5), 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod J (2003) An Introduction to Counselling, 3rd edn, Open University Press, Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Scarbrough H and Swan J (2006) Sharing knowledge across projects: limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management Learning 37 (2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce CL (2004) The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive 18 (1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce CL, Conger JA and Locke EA (2007) Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly 18 (3), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pels D (1996) The politics of symmetry. Social Studies of Science 26 (2), 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J and Ward J (2005) Unlocking sustained business value from IT investments. California Management Review 48 (1), 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch TJ and Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14 (3), 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1993) Legitimating clinical research in the study of organizational culture. Journal of Counseling & Development 71 (6), 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1995) Process consultation, action research and clinical inquiry: are they the same? Journal of Managerial Psychology 10 (6), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz A (1962) Common–sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In Collected Papers 1: The Problem of Social Reality (Natanson M, Ed.), pp 3–47, Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HJ and Keil M (2003) The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: a theoretical model. Information Systems Journal 13 (1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Doerr L, Manev IM and Rizova P (2004) The meaning of success: network position and the social construction of project outcomes in an RandD lab. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management 21 (1), 51–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman BW and Jensen MAC (1977) Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies 2 (4), 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JR (1999) The Handbook of Project-Based Management: Improving the Processes for Achieving Strategic Objectives, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JR (2003) People in Project Management. Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JR (2004) Five necessary conditions for project success. International Journal of Project Management 22 (5), 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser M and Morrison J (1998) Project memory: information management for project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (4), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams T (2007) Post-project reviews to gain effective lessons learned. PM Network 21 (4), 75–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davar Rezania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rezania, D., Lingham, T. Towards a method to disseminate knowledge from the post project review. Knowl Manage Res Pract 7, 172–177 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.9

Keywords

Navigation