Abstract
Fluidity in the transfer of knowledge is rightly touted, because the pace of work rewards businesses that know what they know – and know it right away. Companies are, therefore, understandably eager to exploit technology in new knowledge management systems. Business leaders should recognize, however, that new technology never grants its bounty freely: it exacts a cost when it amplifies our abilities. Increasingly, the tools of the Information Age are encouraging us to learn just enough, just in time. Such shallow learning may have unfortunate consequences for business.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davenport TH and Prusak L (1998) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Gorry GA (2005) As simple as possible, but not simpler. Communications of the ACM 48 (9), 119–122.
Gorry GA (2009) At the gates of a magical garden: life in the digital age. The New Atlantis, in press.
Gorry GA and Westbrook RA (2009) Winning the internet confidence game. Corporate Reputation Review 12 (3), in press.
Schivelbusch W (1986) The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Updike J (2006) The end of authorship. The New York Times, 25 June.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorry, G. Technology, knowing and learning. Knowl Manage Res Pract 7, 178–180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.7