Skip to main content
Log in

Building script-based tacit knowledge in call centre trainees

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

An exploratory case study on a technical support call centre in China is presented, which investigates a new paradigm that script-based tacit knowledge for action is built in the brains of learners, rather than transferred. Twelve techniques used by the case study organization to build tacit knowledge scripts in the minds of the trainees are discussed. It was found that one type of script-based tacit knowledge execution can be represented by a set of steps in action-taking that include awareness, attention, diagnosis, action alternative analysis, action taking, and outcome evaluation. The case findings show that the notion of building, rather than transferring tacit knowledge is helpful in understanding the organizational processes used to bring new employees up to working skill levels, and suggest that similar processes and training methods for building tacit knowledge scripts can be used by other organizations to transform a new recruit to an experienced and valued employee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson RP (1976) Script processing in attitude formation and decision-making. In Cognition and Social Behavior (CARROLL JS and PAYNE JW, Eds), pp 33–46, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abelson RP (1981) Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist 36 (7), 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M and Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25 (1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini V and Bowman C (2001) Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. The Journal of Management Studies 38 (6), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badderley A, Eysenck MC and Anderson MC (2009) Memory. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (2000) The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaye ALM (1996) Case study research: a multi-faceted research approach for IS. Information Systems Journal 6 (3), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Eredita M and Barreto C (2006) How does tacit knowledge proliferate? An episode-based perspective. Organization Studies 27 (12), 1821–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1938) Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut M (2004) Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 26 (2), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay LR and Diehl PL (1992) Research Methods for Business and Management. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia DA and Manz CC (1985) Linking cognition and behavior: a script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. The Academy of Management Review 10 (3), 527–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia DA and Poole PP (1984) Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review 9 (3), 449–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson LS (1997) Why g matters: the complexity of everyday life. Intelligence 24 (1), 79–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson LS (2003a) Dissecting practical intelligence theory: its claims and evidence. Intelligence 31 (4), 343–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson LS (2003b) On Sternberg's ‘Reply to Gottfredson’. Intelligence 31 (4), 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay S (2006) Conceptualizing knowledge creation: a critique of Nonaka's theory. Journal of Management Studies 43 (7), 1415–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth PM and Kimble C (2002) The duality of knowledge. Information Research 8 (1), 1368–1613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichijo K and Kohlbacher F (2008) Tapping tacit local knowledge in emerging markets – the Toyota way. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (3), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1951) Field Theory in Social Sciences. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch G and Granger R (2008) Big Brain: The Origins and Future of Human Intelligence. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science 5 (1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and von Krogh G (2009) Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science 20 (3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1951) Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1970) Genetic Epistemology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts MJ and Yeung MB (2000) Managing learning and tacit knowledge. Strategic Change 9 (6), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday and Co., Garden City NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1967) The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Refaiy M and Labib A (2009) The effect of applying tacit knowledge on maintenance performance: an empirical study of the energy sector in the U.K. and Arab countries. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7 (3), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro R and Collins H (2007) The bread-making machine: tacit knowledge and two types of action. Organization Studies 28 (9), 1417–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E and Cannon-Bowers JA (2001) The science of training: a decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shank R and Abelson R (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg R, Forsyth GB, Hedlund J, Horvath JA, Wagner RK and Williams WM (2000) Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (1996) The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal 17 (SI), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2003) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (LYLES E-Sa, Ed), pp 411–427, Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In Organization of Memory (TULVING E and DONALDSON W, Eds), pp 381–403, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1995) Organization of memory: quo vadis? In The Cognitive Neurosciences (GAZZANIGA MS, Ed), pp 839–847, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1989) Case Study Research – Design and Methods (revised edition). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J McQueen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McQueen, R., Chen, J. Building script-based tacit knowledge in call centre trainees. Knowl Manage Res Pract 8, 240–255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2010.18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2010.18

Keywords

Navigation