Skip to main content
Log in

Learning capability: the effect of existing knowledge on learning

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

It has been observed that different people learn the same things in different ways – increasing their knowledge of the subject/domain uniquely. One plausible reason for this disparity in learning is the difference in the existing personal knowledge held in the particular area in which the knowledge increase happens. To understand this further, in this paper knowledge is modelled as a ‘system of cognitive schemata’, and knowledge increase as a process in this system; the effect of existing personal knowledge on knowledge increase is ‘the Learning Capability’. Learning Capability is obtained in form of a function, although it is merely a representation making use of mathematical symbolism, not a calculable entity. The examination of the function tells us about the nature of learning capability. However, existing knowledge is only one factor affecting knowledge increase and thus one component of a more general model, which might additionally include talent, learning willingness, and attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science 17 (11), 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD (1994) The magical number seven: still magic after all these years? Psychological Review 101 (2), 353–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD (1998) Working memory. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences – Series III – Sciences de la Vie 321 (2–3), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD (2001) Is working memory still working? American Psychologist 56 (11), 851–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baracskai Z (1999) A profi vezető nem használ szakácskönyvet [The Master of Leadership], “Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg megyei Könyvtárak” Egyesülés, Nyíregyháza, Hungary [in Hungarian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett SFC (1932/1967) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1972/2000) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1980) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Bantam Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding KE (1956) General systems theory: the skeleton of science. Management Science 2 (3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding KE (1966) The economics of knowledge and the knowledge of economics. The American Economic Review 56 (1/2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding KE (1985) The World as a Total System. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (1996) The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. Flamingo, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase WG and Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4 (1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1999a) Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective. In Soft Systems Methodology in Action (CHECKLAND PB and SCHOLES J, Eds), pp A1–A66, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1999b/2003) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi M (2002) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, 2nd edn, Rider, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Prusak L (2000) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, paperback edn, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono E (1976) Practical Thinking. Penguin Books, London, originally published 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler V (2003) The model of learning willingness. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Knowledge Management (McGRATH F and REMENYI D, Eds), pp 275–284, MCIL, Reading, UK.

  • Dörfler V (2004) Factors of attention. In Proceedings of the Bangkok International Conference on Applied Business Research, BICABR, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Dörfler V and Szendrey J (2008) From knowledge management to cognition management: a multi-potential view of cognition. OLKC 2008: International Conference on Organizational Learning Knowledge and Capabilities, 28–30 April 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark. [WWW document] http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/olkc3/papers/contribution278.pdf (accessed 30 May 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler V, Baracskai Z, Velencei J and Ackermann F (2008) Intuition: a new knowledge model for knowledge management. AoM 2008: The Sixty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 8–13 August 2008 Anaheim, CA. [WWW document] http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/7383/ (accessed 30 May 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler V, Baracskai Z and Velencei J (2009) Knowledge levels: 3-D model of the levels of expertise. The Sixty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 7–11 August 2009, Chicago, IL. [WWW document] http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/14429/ (accessed 30 May 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA (1996) The acquisition of expert performance: an introduction to some of the issues. In The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (ERICSSON KA, Ed), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2004) On the logical insolvability of the Gettier problem. Synthese 142 (1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettier EL (1963) Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23 (6), 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet F and Simon HA (1996a) Recall of random and distorted chess positions: implications for the theory of expertise. Memory & Cognition 24 (4), 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet F and Simon HA (1996b) Templates in chess memory: mechanism for re-calling several boards. Cognitive Psychology 31 (1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter DR (2000) Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, 2nd edn, Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • László E (1972) The Systems View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developments in the Sciences. George Braziller, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • László E (2001) A rendszerelmélet távlatai [Perspectives of System Theory], Magyar Könyvklub, Budapest, Hungary [in Hungarian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR and Varela FJ (1979) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • MérŐ L (1990) Ways of Thinking: The Limits of Rational Thought and Artificial Intelligence. World Scientific, New Jersey, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MérŐ L (1998) Moral Calculations: Game Theory, Logic, and Human Frailty. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63 (2), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky ML (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision (WINSTON PH, Ed), pp 221–242, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

  • Neisser U (1967) Cognitive Psychology. Meredith Publishing, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (360 BC) Theaetetus [WWW document] http://eserver.org/philosophy/plato/theaetetus.txt (accessed 30 May 2010).

  • Polanyi M (1962/2002) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prietula MJ and Simon HA (1989) The experts in your midst. Harvard Business Review 67 (January–February), 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I (1997) The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. The Free Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE and Norman DA (1988) Representation in memory. In Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology (ATKINSON RC, HERRNSTEIN RJ, LINDZEY G and LUCE RD, Eds), 2nd edn, Vol. 2: Learning and Cognition), pp 511–587, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell BA (1948/2003) Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1974) How big is a chunk? Science 183 (4124), 482–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1976) The information storage system called “human memory”. In Models of Thought (SIMON HA, Ed), pp 62–83, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1995) The information-processing theory of mind. American Psychologist 50 (7), 507–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA and Barenfeld M (1969) Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving. Psychological Review 76 (5), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA and Gilmartin K (1973) A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology 5 (1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby K-E (1997) The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring Knowledge-based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1969/2003) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, 14th paperback edn, George Braziller, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Dörfler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dörfler, V. Learning capability: the effect of existing knowledge on learning. Knowl Manage Res Pract 8, 369–379 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2010.15

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2010.15

Keywords

Navigation