Skip to main content
Log in

‘New Ways of Working’ as a tool for improving the performance of a knowledge-intensive company

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

This paper explores ‘New Ways of Working’ (NewWoW) – that is, non-traditional mobile and flexible work practices, settings and locations using sufficient ICT tools – as a novel approach to improve the performance of a knowledge-intensive organization. This paper makes a contribution by illustrating how the measurement of the impacts of NewWoW can be done and by producing empirical evidence of the benefits of NewWoW. The conceptual background of the study is anchored in the literature on knowledge work productivity and performance as well as on NewWoW. The empirical section reports a longitudinal case study of a change process during which the case company, Rapal, went through a NewWoW project. The impacts of the change are evaluated based on the results of both objective and subjective performance measures. The project was successful and resulted in significant cost savings as well as improvements in environmental performance (CO2 emissions).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboelmaged MG and El Subbaugh SM (2012) Factors influencing perceived productivity of Egyptian teleworkers: an empirical study. Measuring Business Excellence 16 (2), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M (1993) Organizations as rhetoric: knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies 30 (6), 997–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16 (6), 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Ruohomäki V and Vartiainen M (2009) Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. Journal of Knowledge Management 13 (6), 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis N (2011) Information Bombardment: Rising above the Digital Onslaught. Institute for Intellectual Capital Research, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne M, Mills J, Wilcox M, Neely A and Platts K (2000) Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20 (7), 754–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley S (2002) What’s working? Briefing and evaluating workplace performance improvement. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 4 (2), 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breu T, Maselli D and Hurni H (2005) Knowledge for sustainable development in the Tajik Pamir Mountains. Mountain Research and Development 25 (2), 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (2008) Improving knowledge worker performance. In From Strategy to Execution: Turing Accelerated Global Change into Opportunity (Pantaleo D and Pal N, Eds), pp 215–235, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MC, Leach DJ and Clegg CW (2011) The physical environment of the office: contemporary and emerging issues. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 26 (1), 193–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. California Management Review 41 (2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Kuijer PP and Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics 48 (2), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felstead A, Jewson N and Walters S (2005) The shifting locations of work: new statistical evidence on the spaces and places of employment. Work, Employment and Society 19 (2), 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson V (2003) Flexible working needs flexible space? Towards an alternative workplace strategy. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 21 (1), 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorgievski MJ, van der Voordt TJM, van Herpen SGA and van Akkeren S (2010) After the fire – new ways of working in an academic setting. Facilities 28 (3/4), 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene C and Myerson J (2011) Space for thought: designing for knowledge workers. Facilities 29 (1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C and Ojasalo K (2004) Service productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. Journal of Business Research 57 (4), 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy B et al (2008) Working Beyond Walls: The Government Workplace As an Agent of Change. DEGW, Office of Government Commerce, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanain MA (2006) Factors affecting the development of flexible workplace facilities. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 8 (4), 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen JH, Kampschroer K, Powell KM and Loftness V (2004) Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research & Information 32 (6), 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hislop D and Axtell C (2009) To infinity and beyond?: Workspace and the multi-location worker. New Technology, Work and Employment 24 (1), 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtshouse D (2010) Knowledge work 2020: thinking ahead about knowledge work. On the Horizon 18 (3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jääskeläinen A and Laihonen H (2013) Overcoming the specific performance measurement challenges of knowledge-intensive organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 62 (4), 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jääskeläinen A et al (2012) A contingency approach to performance measurement in service operations. Measuring Business Excellence 16 (1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen B (2003) Baby Boomers, generation X and generation Y?: Policy implications for defence forces in the modern era. Foresight 5 (4), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junnila S (2006) Alternative scenarios for managing the environmental performance of a service sector company. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10 (4), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1996) The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käpylä J, Laihonen H, Lönnqvist A and Carlucci D (2011) Knowledge-intensity as an organisational characteristic. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 9 (4), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laihonen H, Jääskeläinen A, Lönnqvist A and Ruostela J (2012) Measuring the productivity impacts of new ways of working. Journal of Facilities Management 10 (2), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles I et al (1995) Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers and sources of innovation European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS), EIMS Publication No. 15, Luxembourg.

  • Neely A, Adams C and Kennerley M (2002) The Performance Prism. The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. Prentice Hall Financial Times, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely A et al (2000) Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20 (10), 1119–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nudurupati SS, Bititci US, Kumar V and Chan FTS (2011) State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering 60 (2), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill MJ (2010) A model of environmental control and effective work. Facilities 28 (3/4), 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Origo F and Pagani L (2008) Workplace flexibility and job satisfaction: some evidence from Europe. International Journal of Manpower 29 (6), 539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A (2002) Service quality and productivity: a synergistic perspective. Managing Service Quality 12 (1), 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez YW and Nembhard DA (2004) Measuring knowledge worker productivity: a taxonomy. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5 (4), 602–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray PK and Sahu S (1989) The measurement and evaluation of white-collar productivity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 9 (4), 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt W, Schmidt B, Sloep P and Drachsler H (2011) Knowledge worker roles and actions – results of two empirical studies. Knowledge and Process Management 18 (3), 150–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez M (2003) Flexible working patterns using annualised hours. Work Study 52 (3), 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sink D (1983) Much do about productivity: where do we go from here. Industrial Engineering. October 36–48.

  • Stake R (1995) The Art of Case Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH (1992) Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies 29 (6), 713–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby KE and Risling A (1986) Kunskapsföretaget – Seklets viktigaste ledarutmaning? (The Knowledge Firm – This Century’s Most Important Managerial Challenge?). Liber AB, Malmö.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby KE (1997) The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangen S (2005) Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54 (1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Voordt TJM (2004) Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 6 (2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Meel J (2011) The origins of new ways of working: office concepts in the 1970s. Facilities 29 (9/10), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen M (2007) Analysis of multilocational and mobile knowledge workers’ work spaces. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4562/2007, pp 194-203.

  • Vartiainen M and Hyrkkänen U (2010) Changing requirements and mental workload factors in mobile multi-locational work. New Technology, Work and Employment 25 (2), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vischer JC (2006) The concept of workplace performance and its value to managers. California Management Review 49 (2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review 35 (1), 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuolle M (2010) Productivity impacts of mobile office service. International Journal of Services Technology and Management 14 (4), 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuolle M (2011) Measuring performance impacts of mobile business services from the customer perspective. Tampere University of Technology. Publication 1013.

  • Warren CMJ, Simmons J and Trumble N (2007) The future @ work: delivering effective corporate real estate. Facilities 25 (11/12), 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1995) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruostela, J., Lönnqvist, A., Palvalin, M. et al. ‘New Ways of Working’ as a tool for improving the performance of a knowledge-intensive company. Knowl Manage Res Pract 13, 382–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.57

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.57

Keywords

Navigation