Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Issues in the management of embedded knowledge in project-based organizations: the project actor’s role

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) in project-based organizations has received substantial attention in recent years, as knowledge processes are insufficiently supported within the organization as a whole. This study specifically focuses on the project actor’s role in managing knowledge. From an actor’s perspective, the problems raised by knowledge embeddedness are identified as a key issue to link project knowledge and organizational knowledge. A conceptual framework is developed that addresses three different aspects of knowledge embeddedness: a relational dimension, a temporal dimension and a structural dimension. Three cases are studied, covering varying forms of organizations in different areas (a consulting firm, an R&D department and an industrial business unit). The results concerning the relational dimension indicate that project actors re-build the network of relationships supporting knowledge. Regarding the temporal dimension, and specifically in their professional field, actors frame professional knowledge related to their project experience. However, actors fail to surmount the problems raised by the structural dimension of knowledge embeddedness. The resulting recommendations for KM concern both Human Resource Management practices and organizational design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayas K and Zeniuk N (2001) Project-based learning: building communities of reflective practitioners. Management Learning 2 (3), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady T and Davies A (2004) Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies 25 (9), 1601–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredin K (2008) People capability of project-based organisations: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management 26 (5), 566–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredin K and Söderlund J (2012) Project managers and career models: an exploratory comparative study. International Journal of Project Management 31 (6), 889–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen M, Edelman L, Newell S, Scarbrough H and Swan J (2003) Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments. International Journal of Project Management 21 (3), 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen M, Goussevskaia A and Swan J (2004) Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization Studies 25 (9), 1535–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen M, Goussevskaia A and Swan J (2005) Organizational routines, situated learning and processes of change in project-based organizations. Project Management Journal 36 (3), 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes NJ, Morton SC, Dainty AR and Burns ND (2006) Social processes, patterns and practices and project knowledge management: a theoretical framework and an empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management 24 (4), 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organisation Science 12 (2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgers H, Van den Bosch F and Volberda H (2008) Why new business development projects fail: coping with the differences of technological versus market knowledge. Long Range Planning 41 (1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organisation Science 15 (5), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier M and Friedberg E (1981) L’acteur et le système. Les contraintes de l’action collective. Editions du Seuil, Paris.

  • DeFilippi R and Arthur M (1998) Paradox in project based enterprise: the case of film-making. California Management Review 40 (2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM and Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enberg C, Lindkvist L and Tell F (2006) Exploring the dynamics of knowledge integration: acting and interacting in project teams. Management Learning 37 (2), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick T (2008) Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: a review of research. Management Learning 39 (3), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernie S, Green S, Weller S and Newcombe R (2003) Knowledge sharing: context, confusion and controversy. International Journal of Project Management 21 (3), 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (2007) The emerging knowledge governance approach: challenges and characteristics. Organization 14 (1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AJ and Ribeiro JL (2012) An integrative model for knowledge transfer between new product development project teams. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, advance online publication 17 December, doi:10.1057/kmrp.2012.57.

  • Frederiksen L and Davies A (2008) Vanguards and ventures: projects as vehicles for corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Project Management 26 (5), 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gareis R (2010) Changes of organizations by projects. International Journal of Project Management 28 (4), 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B and Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher G (2004) Temporary architectures of learning: knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies 25 (9), 1491–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91 (3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hällgren M and Wilson TL (2007) Mini-muddling: learning from project plan deviations. Journal of Workplace Learning 19 (2), 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A (2002) Coopération et conception collective. Variété et crises des rapports de prescription. In Coopération et Conception (de Terssac G and Friedberg E, Eds), 2nd édn, pp 101–112, Octarès Editions, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D and Zhou J (2009) A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. The Academy of Management Journal 52 (2), 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M (2000) The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy 29 (7–8), 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson DE and Cicmil S (2007) The politics of standards in modern management: making ‘the project’ a reality. Journal of Management Studies 44 (3), 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao RL, Tsai SD and Lee CF (2006) The problems of embeddedness: knowledge transfer, coordination and reuse in information systems. Organization Studies 27 (9), 1289–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JC and Newell S (2003) Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management 21 (3), 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C and Lichtenstein BB (2008) Temporary inter-organizational projects: how temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations (Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C and Smith Ring P, Eds), pp 231–255, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koners U and Goffin K (2007) Learning from post-project reviews: a cross-case analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (3), 242–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam A (1997) Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organization Studies 18 (6), 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam A (2000) Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework. Organization Studies 21 (3), 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J and Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning, Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner F and Wald A (2011) Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management 29 (7), 877–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindkvist L (2005) Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of Management Studies 42 (6), 1189–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin RA and Söderholm A (1995) A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11 (4), 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Scarbrough H and Swan J (2006) Sharing knowledge across projects. Management Learning 37 (2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organisation Science 5 (1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R and Konno N (2000) SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33 (1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini A, Rubera Gaia and Sala M (2008) Integrating functional knowledge and embedding learning in new product launches: how project forms helped EMI Music. Long Range Planning 41 (1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh M and Frey B (2000) Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organisation Science 11 (5), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltokorpi V, Nonaka I and Kodama M (2007) NTT DoCoMo’s launch of I-Mode in the Japanese mobile phone market: a knowledge creation perspective. Journal of Management Studies 44 (1), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltokorpi V and Tsuyuki E (2006) Knowledge governance in a Japanese project-based organization. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 4 (1), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemsel S and Müller R (2012) The governance of knowledge in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management 30 (8), 865–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organisation Science 1 (3), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam C (2013) Coordinating temporary organizations in international development through social and temporal embeddedness. International Journal of Project Management 31 (2), 90–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raelin JA (2001) Public reflection as the basis of learning. Management Learning 32 (1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezania D and Lingham T (2009) Towards a method to disseminate knowledge from the post project review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7 (2), 172–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: the role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organisation Science 20 (2), 384–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough H, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Laurent S, Newell S and Swan J (2004) The processes of project-based learning: an exploratory study. Management Learning 35 (4), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler M and Eppler M (2003) Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management 21 (3), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sense AJ (2007) Stimulating situated learning within projects: personalizing the flow of knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 5 (1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sense AJ and Antoni M (2003) Exploring the politics of project learning. International Journal of Project Management 21 (7), 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderlund J (2005) Developing project competence: empirical regularities in competitive project operations. International Journal of Innovation Management 9 (4), 451–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderlund J (2008) Competence dynamics and learning processes in project-based firms: shifting, adapting and leveraging. International Journal of Innovation Management 12 (1), 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderlund J (2011) Pluralism in project management: navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews 13 (2), 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Newell S, Scarbrough H and Hislop D (1999) Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management 3 (4), 262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Scarbrough H and Newell S (2010) Why don’t (or do) organizations learn from projects? Management Learning 41 (3), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J, Lindkvist L and DeFilippi R (2004) Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge. Organization Studies 25 (9), 1475–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tempest S and Starkey K (2004) The effects of liminality on individual and organizational learning. Organization Studies 25 (4), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh G, Nonaka I and Rechsteiner L (2012) Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: a review and framework. Journal of Management Studies 49 (1), 240–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Toulouse Business School, Université de Toulouse, France

    Sophie d'Armagnac

Authors
  1. Sophie d'Armagnac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie d'Armagnac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

d'Armagnac, S. Issues in the management of embedded knowledge in project-based organizations: the project actor’s role. Knowl Manage Res Pract 13, 446–462 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.62

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.62

Keywords

Search

Navigation