Skip to main content
Log in

Killing two birds with one stone? Why we need two separate questions on race and ethnicity in the 2020 census and beyond

  • El Foro
  • Published:
Latino Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lack of theoretical and methodological clarity about “race” and ethnicity is a major stumbling block for mapping and ameliorating inequalities among Latinas/os and other marginalized groups in the United States as well as across the globe. In this article, I examine the findings of the Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Final Report of the 2010 U.S. Census. I explore the value-added by analyzing the social outcomes of Latinos by ethnicity (national origin, ancestry, cultural background) and race (racial status). I argue that you cannot kill two birds with one stone; you cannot capture two analytically distinct concepts with one question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the terms Latinas/os and Hispanic interchangeably.

  2. The AQE also tested versions of the questionnaire that omitted the word race – a position that is in direct opposition to the ASA (2003) Race Statement.

  3. This question was replaced by an ancestry question in the 1980 Census.

  4. Since 1980, the parental place of birth question has been replaced by the ancestry question (Humes and Hogan, 2009).

  5. In June 2013, France officially eliminated the term “race” from its legal monitoring system. The AAA (1997) and the 1950 UNESCO Race Statement also recommend elimination of the term “race” and replacement with the term “ethnicity” (Doniger, 1950). It remains to be seen whether the United States will follow this so-called “colorblind” path (Bonilla-Silva, 2005; Omi and Winant, 1994).

References

  • American Anthropological Association (AAA). 1997. American Anthropological Association Response to OMB Directive 15: Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting, http://www.aaanet.org/gvt/ombdraft.htm, accessed 6 January 2013.

  • American Sociological Association (ASA). 2003. Statement of the American Sociological Association on the Importance of Collecting Data and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race, http://www.asanet.org/page.ww?section=Issue+Statementsandname=Collecting+Data+on+Race, accessed 6 January 2013.

  • Bonilla-Silva, E . 1999. The Essential Social Fact of Race. American Sociological Review 64 (6): 899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E . 2005. Racism Without Racists: Colorblind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States, 2nd edn New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H . 2009. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, E., M. Bentley, S. Ennis and S. Rastogi . 2012. 2010. Census Race and Hispanic Origin Alternative Questionnaire Experiment: Final Report, http://www.census.gov/2010census/pdf/2010_Census_Race_HO_AQE.pdf, accessed 1 September 2013.

  • Doniger, S . 1950. Statement on Race Issued by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Pastoral Psychology 1 (9): 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, W.E.B . 1999. The Souls of Black Folks, eds. H.L. Gates Jr and T.H. Oliver, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, L . 2007. Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, L. and N. López, eds. 2013. Mapping “Race”: Critical Approaches to Health Disparities Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravlee, C.C., W. Dressler and H. Bernard . 2005. Skin Color, Social Classification, and Blood Pressure in Puerto Rico. American Journal of Public Health 95 (12): 2191–2197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D . 2012. An Intersectional Approach to Men’s Health. Journal of Men’s Health 9 (2): 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney-Lopez, I . 1994. White By Law: The Legal Construction of Race, New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humes, K. and H. Hogan . 2009. Measurement of Race and Ethnicity in a Changing Multicultural America. Race and Social Problems 1 (3): 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. et al 2008. Using ‘Socially Assigned Race’ to Probe White Advantages in Health Status. Ethnicity & Disease 18: 496–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaVeist-Ramos, T., J. Galarraga, R. Thorpe, C. Bell and C. Austin . 2012. Are Black Hispanics Black or Hispanic? Exploring Disparities at the Intersection of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health 66 (7): 1136.1–1136.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J . 2003. How “Race” Counts for Hispanic Americans. Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research University at Albany. Working Paper, July 14.

  • López, N . 2003. Hopeful Girls, Troubled Boys: Race and Gender Disparity in Urban Education, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, N . 2013. Contextualizing Lived Race-Gender & the Racialized-Gendered Social Determinants of Health. In Mapping “Race”: Critical Approaches to Health Disparities Research eds. L. Gómez and N. López, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. and N. Denton . 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M. and H. Winant . 1994. Racial Formation in the U.S.: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z . 2005. Breaking the Last Taboo: Interracial Marriage in America. Contexts 4 (4): 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C . 2000. Changing Race: Latinos, the Census, and the History of Ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C., G. Argeros and M. Miyawaki . 2011. Does Race and National Origins Influence the Hourly Wages that Latino Males Receive. In Invisible No More: Understanding the Disenfranchisement of Latino Men and Boys, eds. P. Noguera, E. Fergus and A. Hurtado, 207–217. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C., M. Miyawaki and G. Argeros . 2013. Latino Racial Reporting in the U.S.: To be or not to be. Sociological Compass 7 (5): 390–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W . 2010. Racial Mismatch: The Divergence Between Form and Function in Data for Monitoring Racial Discrimination of Hispanics. Social Science Quarterly 91 (5): 1288–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. and S. Demuth . 2000. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? American Sociological Review 65 (7): 705–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telles, E . 2006. Race in Another America: The Continuing Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telles, E. and E. Murguia . 1996. Phenotype and Schooling Among Mexican Americans. Sociology of Education 69 (4): 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transdisciplinary “Race” Working Group. 2010. Transdisciplinary Guidelines For Researching “Race.” Transdisciplinary “Race” Working Group. Institute for the Study of “Race” and Social Justice, RWJF Center for Health Policy, University of New Mexico.

  • Turner, M.A., R. Santos, D. Levy, D. Wissoker, C. Arandia and R. Pitingolo . 2013. Housing Discrimination Against Racial and Ethnic Minorities 2012: Executive Summary. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, http://www.huduser.org/portal/Publications/pdf/HUD-514_HDS2012_execsumm.pdf, accessed 6 December 2013.

  • U.S. Census. 2010. The Hispanic Population: 2010. Census Briefs. U.S. Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau, May. www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispanic.html, accessed 6 January 2013.

  • Vidal-Ortiz, S . 2004. On Being a White Person of Color: Using Autoethnography to Understand Puerto Ricans’ Racialization. Qualitative Sociology 27 (2): 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagley, C . 1975. On the concept of social race in the Americas. In The Nacirema: Readings on American Culture. Lanham, MD: Little Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi, T. and E. Bonilla-Silva, eds. 2008. White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this article appeared as a commentary for the National Institute on Latino Policy (NiLP), 10 January 2013.

In Fall 2011, Dr. Laura Gómez joined the faculty at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). As of Fall 2011, Dr. Nancy López directs the Institute. We are grateful to Dr. Robert Valdez, former executive director, RWJF Center for Health Policy, for providing seed funding for the inauguration of the Institute in January 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, N. Killing two birds with one stone? Why we need two separate questions on race and ethnicity in the 2020 census and beyond. Lat Stud 11, 428–438 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2013.25

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2013.25

Keywords

Navigation