Skip to main content
Log in

A review of dry ports

  • Policy Perspectives
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

The objective of this article is to present the previous research on the dry port concept and to review the world's existing dry ports, that is freight terminals that use the term ‘dry port’ in their name. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to clarify the concept by showing potential discrepancies or agreements between theory and practice. Starting from a literature review on the dry port concept, this article presents a review of existing dry ports in the world. A number of qualitative criteria regarding the range of services at dry ports or their features could be theoretically established, although the same may vary depending on customer demand. However, the ultimate purpose of dry ports is the same, irrespective of that range. This article contributes to the study of dry ports by synthesizing a literature review on the subject of dry ports; moreover, it provides an overview of dry ports in the world and as such makes a contribution to the scarce research on the dry port concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, P., Peeters, D. and Thomas, I. (2004) Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system. Transportation Research Part E 40: 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, H. and Brodin, M.H. (2006) The environmental impact of changing logistics structures. The International Journal of Logistics Management 17 (3): 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballis, A. and Golias, J. (2002) Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail – Road freight transport terminals. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 36 (7): 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, A.K.C. and Dubey, R.C. (1990) Handbook on the Management and Operation of Dry Ports. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotugno, H. and Wood, L. (2003) Measuring sensitive information through personal interviews. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Sheraton Music City, Nashville, TN.

  • Economic Commission for Europe. (2001) Terminology on Combined Transport. New York and Geneva: UN.

  • Eldredge, J.D. (2004) Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics. Journal of Medical Library Association 92 (1): 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000) IQ – Intermodal Quality. Final Report, Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme – Integrated Transport Chain.

  • European Commission. (2001) European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to decide. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg. White Paper.

  • Fink, A. (2002) The Survey Handbook, Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanappe, P. (1986) Plates-formes logistique, centres de logistigue, ports secs…. Recherche Transports Sécurité, INRETS, Arceuil, Decembre, 21–26.

  • Höltgen, D. (1995) Terminals, intermodal logistics centres and European infrastructure policy. Dissertation, European Centre for Infrastructure Studies.

  • JC Trans Logistics Inc. (2008) Advantages and disadvantages of no-water-ports, http://info.jctrans.com/zhuanti/zt3/wz2/2008416624040.shtml, accessed 20 February 2009.

  • Konings, J.W. (1996) Integrated centres for the transshipment, storage, collection and distribution of goods – A survey of the possibilities for a high-quality intermodal transport concept. Transport Policy 3 (1/2): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozan, E. (2006) Optimum capacity for intermodal container terminals. Transportation Planning and Technology 29 (6): 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveque, P. and Roso, V. (2002) Dry port concept for seaport inland access with intermodal solutions. Master's Thesis, Department of logistics and transportation, Chalmers University of Technology.

  • Marriott, F.H.C. (1990) A Dictionary of Statistical Term, 5th edn., Prepared for the International Statistical Institute. Burnt Mill, Harlow, Essex, England: Published for the International Statistical Institute by Longman Scientific & Technical; New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazaheri, A. and Ekwall, D. (2009) Impacts of the ISPS code on port activities – A case study on Swedish ports. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, Special issue on ‘Northern dimension of European logistics’, 2 (4): 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Fazenda. (2009) Portos secos, http://www.receita.fazenda.gov.br/Aduana/Eadi.htm, accessed 24 January 2009.

  • Munford, C. (1980) Buenos Aires – Congestion and the dry port solution. Cargo Systems International: The Journal of ICHCA 7 (10): 26–27, 29, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K.Y.A. and Gujar, G.C. (2008) The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India. Journal of Transport Geography 17 (5): 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekin, E. and Macharis, C. (2007) A GIS-based location analysis model for intermodal terminals. Paper presented at International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress 2007; 8–9 November 2007, Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Rahimi, M., Asef-Vaziri, A. and Harrison, R. (2008) An inland port location-allocation model for a regional intermodal goods movement system. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10: 362–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roso, V. (2007) Evaluation of the dry port concept from an environmental perspective. Transportation Research Part D 12 (7): 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roso, V. (2008) Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38 (10): 782–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roso, V. and Lumsden, K. (2009) The dry port concept – Moving seaport activities inland? To be published in UN ESCAP Monograph on dry ports:Dry Port Development in Asia and Other Regions: Theory and Practice.

  • Roso, V., Woxenius, J. and Lumsden, K. (2009) The dry port concept: Connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 17 (5): 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, B.C.M. (1998) The design of a terminal network for intermodal transport. Transport Logistics 1: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B. (1999) Satellite terminals: A local solution to hub congestion? Journal of Transport Geography 7: 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsamboulas, D. and Dimitropoulos, I. (1999) Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – Freight villages: A comparative analysis. Transportation 26 (4): 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsilingris, P.S. and Laguardia, C.T. (2007) Dry vis-à-vis water ports: Partners or competitors? The case of Spain. Paper presented at 1st International Scientific Conference: Competitiveness and Complementarity of Transport Modes – Perspectives for the Development of Intermodal Transport University of the Aegean; 10–12 May 2007, Chios, Greece.

  • UN ECE. (1998) UN/LOCODE – Code for Ports and Other Locations. Recommendation 16, Geneva.

  • Van Der Horst, M.R. and De Langen, P.W. (2008) Coordination in hinterland transport chains: A major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics and Logistics 10 (1–2): 108–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandervoort, C. and Morgan, M. (1999) Reducing Transport Costs of Egypt's Exports, DEPRA Project, Nathan Associates Inc, Arlington, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Cargo News. (2000a) Dry port Dunkirk. March 2000: 12.

  • World Cargo News. (2000b) Dry ports open in Zaragoza. August 2000: 9.

  • World Cargo News. (2001) Nepalese dry ports ready. August 2001: 14.

  • World Cargo News. (2005) Birgunj dry port operational. May 2005: 22.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Policy Perspectives Often, MEL includes a special section under the heading ‘Policy Perspectives’. Papers here, often solicited ones, emphasise strategic policy implications rather than scientific rigour in a strict sense. Papers in Policy Perspectives are not subject to peer review; this results in speedier publication. Papers submitted to MEL are submitted for both sections at the discretion of the Editors. Authors not wishing to have their papers considered for Policy Perspectives should state this in the Cover Letter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roso, V., Lumsden, K. A review of dry ports. Marit Econ Logist 12, 196–213 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2010.5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2010.5

Keywords

Navigation