Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity investment and efficiency cost estimations in major East Asian ports

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

This study applies an integrated suite of Data Envelopment Analysis models to investigate the various sources of efficiency contributing to the overall efficiency of major ports in Asia and estimates the amount of savings a port can potentially achieve through intelligent capital investments that promote a lean and fully efficient operation. Empirical results reveal that the Asia port industry is generally characterized by non-decreasing returns to scale. Hong Kong, Shanghai, Ningbo, Shenzhen, Incheon and Singapore found to be operating at their most productive scales and are fully technical, scale and mix efficient. Competitiveness benchmarking analysis further shows that Japanese ports will benefit the most by reducing excess capacity and the associated financial commitments through economizing on the deployment of physical resources. Similarly, Busan port in Korea possesses significant potential to regain traffic from its Chinese competitors via cost reduction. However, the competitiveness of the Singapore and Hong Kong ports may be eroded as the Malaysian and Taiwanese ports remove their productivity slacks and improve cost efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashar, A. (1997) Counting the moves. Port Development International 13: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, A.J. (1996) Containerisation and the decline of upstream urban ports in Europe. Maritime Policy and Management 23: 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., Bardhan, I. and Cooper, W.W. (1996) A note on returns to scale in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 88: 583–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30 (9): 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D. and Morey, R. (1986) Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research 34: 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D. and Thrall, R.M. (1992) Estimating most productive scale size using Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 62: 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banos, J., Coto, P. and Rodriguez, A. (1999) Allocative efficiency and over capitalization: An application. International Journal of Transport Economics 26: 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendall, H. and Stent, A. (1987) On measuring cargo handling productivity. Maritime Policy and Management 14: 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Gu, B.S., Li, S.L. and Thrall, R.M. (2001) Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese Industries 1981–1997. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35: 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., Saiford, L.M. and Tone, K. (2007) Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Containerization International Yearbook. (2009) London: National Magazine Co.

  • Coto-Millan, P., Banos-Pino, J. and Rodriguez-Alvarez, A. (2000) Economic efficiency in Spanish ports: Some empirical evidence. Maritime Policy and Management 27: 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Fei, W.T. and Cullinane, S. (2004a) Container terminal development in Mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong. Transport Reviews 24: 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Ji, P. and Wang, T.F. (2005a) The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry. Journal of Economics and Business 57: 433–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. and Song, D.W. (2002) Port privatization policy and practice. Transport Reviews 22: 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. and Song, D.W. (2003) A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of Korean container terminals. Applied Economics 35: 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Song, D.W. and Gray, R. (2002) A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: Assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures. Transportation Research Part A- Policy and Practice 36: 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Song, D.W., Ji, P. and Wang, T.F. (2004b) An application of DEA window analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of Network Economics 3: 184–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Song, D.W. and Wang, T. (2005b) A comparison of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 24: 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. and Wang, T. (2006) The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Logistics – Research and Applications 9: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Monie, G. (1987) Measuring and Evaluating Port Performance and Productivity. UNCTAD Monographs on Port Management No. 6 on Port Management (Geneva, UNCTAD).

  • De Monie, G. (1995) The problems faced by Indian ports today. Maritime Policy and Management 22: 235–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De, P. and Ghosh, B. (2002) Productivity, efficiency and technological change in Indian ports. International Journal of Maritime Economics 4: 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Neufville, R. and Tsunokawa, K. (1981) Productivity and returns to scale of container ports. Maritime Policy and Management 8: 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, T.J. and Leschine, T.M. (1990) Container terminal productivity: A perspective. Maritime Policy and Management 17: 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1999) The size economies and network efficiency of larger container ships. International Journal of Maritime Economics 1: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. and Williams, G.E. (1976) The economics of multi-port itineraries for large container ships. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 10: 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M.M. and Trujillo, L. (2008) Reforms and infrastructure efficiency in Spain's container ports. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice 42: 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helling, A. and Poister, T.H. (2000) US maritime ports: Trends, policy implications, and research needs. Economic Development Quarterly 14: 298–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, A., Nishimura, E. and Papadimitriou, S. (2001) The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transportation Research Part B – Methodological 35: 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. and Sachish, A. (1986) The structure of production, technical change and productivity in a port. The Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C.C. (2008) Evaluating the operational efficiency of major ports in the Asia-Pacific region using Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Economics 40: 1737–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (1995) The comparative performance of public and private enterprises. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 29: 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L.C. and Tseng, C.C. (2007) Operational performance evaluation of major container ports in the Asia Pacific region. Maritime Policy and Management 34: 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd's Register – Fairplay Portguide. (2009) London: Informa Pub. Group.

  • Marconsult. (1994) Major Container Terminals’ Structure and Performances. Report 1994, Genoa.

  • Martinez-Budria, E., Diaz-Armas, R., Navarro-Ibanez, M. and Ravelo-Mesa, T. (1999) A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Transportation Economics 26: 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., Coeck, C. and Van Den Broeck, J. (2000) Measuring and explaining the relative efficiency of container terminals by means of Bayesian stochastic frontier models. International Journal of Maritime Economics 2: 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. and Winkelmans, W. (2001) Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge. Maritime Policy and Management 28: 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.K. and De, P. (2004) An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 6: 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poitras, G., Tongzon, J. and Li, H. (1996) Measuring port efficiency: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Department of Economics, National University of Singapore (mimeo).

  • Roll, Y. and Hayuth, Y. (1993) Port performance comparison applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy and Management 20: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, S.H., Kim, J.J., Cho, G. and Kim, D.K. (2007) Efficiency analysis and ranking of major container ports in Northeast Asia: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis. International Review of Business Research Papers 3: 486–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabernacle, J.B. (1995) A study of the changes in performance of quayside container cranes. Maritime Policy and Management 22: 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L.C., Low, J.M.W. and Lam, S.W. (2008) Understanding port choice behavior: A network perspective. Networks and Spatial Economics, doi: 10.1007/s11067-008-9081-8.

  • Talley, W.K. (1994) Performance indicators and port performance evaluation. Logistics and Transportation Review 30: 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, W.K. (1998) Optimum throughput and performance evaluation of marine terminals. Maritime Policy and Management 15: 327–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terada, H. (2002) An analysis of the overcapacity problem under the decentralized management system of container ports in Japan. Maritime Policy and Management 29: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001) A slack-based measure of efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 130: 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. and Sahoo, B.K. (2004) Degree of scale economies and congestions: A unified DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 158: 755–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, J. (1995) Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice 39: 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, J. (2001) Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice 35: 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, J. and Heng, W. (2005) Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice 39: 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T.F. and Cullinane, K. (2006) The efficiency of European container terminals and implications for supply chain management. Maritime Economics and Logistics 8: 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Competitiveness Yearbook. (2009) Lausanne, Switzerland: International Institute for Management Development.

  • Zhu, J. (2003) Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets. Dordrecht, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express her appreciations to Professor Kim Kap Hwan of Pusan National University for providing the primary data. She would also like to express her appreciation to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments, which have led to this improved version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Low, J. Capacity investment and efficiency cost estimations in major East Asian ports. Marit Econ Logist 12, 370–391 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2010.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2010.13

Keywords

Navigation