Abstract
Container shipping is a significant trade facilitator in supply chains. Embedded within the container shipping system are competitive elements as well as complementary aspects in inter-container port relationships. The article aims to examine these relationships through a thorough investigation of the calling patterns of container shipping services in order to understand the dynamics of competition and complementarity which exist among container ports. Specifically, empirical evidence will be sought from the Pearl River Delta in South China where the analysis will identify the routes and markets where competition or complementarity exists, participants involved, and the extensity and intensity of such relationships between the container ports of Hong Kong and Shenzhen. The investigation shows that apart from container port competition, inter-port complementarity also accounted for a significant share of changes to shipping capacity affected. The article discusses the benefits offered from inter-container port complementarity for advancing the competitive position of container ports and the practical and research implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, A.J. (2002) The economics of transhipment. In: C.T. Grammenos (ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: LLP, pp. 832–859.
Carbone, V. and Martino, M. (2003) The changing role of ports in supply chain management: An empirical analysis. Maritime Policy and Management 30 (4): 305–320.
Comtois, C. (1999) The integration of China's port system into global container shipping. GeoJournal 48: 35–42.
Cullinane, K., Wang, T.F. and Cullinane, S. (2004) Container terminal development in mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong. Transport Reviews 24 (1): 33–56.
De Langen, P.W. (2002) Clustering and performance: The case of maritime clustering in the Netherlands. Maritime Policy and Management 29: 209–221.
De Souza, G.A., Beresford, A.K.C. and Pettit, S.J. (2003) Liner shipping companies and terminal operators: Internationalization or globalization? Maritime Economics and Logistics 5 (4): 393–412.
De, P. and Ghosh, B. (2002) Productivity, efficiency and technological change in Indian ports. International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (4): 348–368.
Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd. (2003) Intra-Asia Container Trades: Dynamism Beyond Bounds. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants.
Flor, L. and Defilippi, E. (2003) Port infrastructure: An access model for the essential facility. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5: 116–132.
Fung, K.F. (2001) Competition between the ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: A structural vector error Correction model to forecast the demand for container handling services. Maritime Policy and Management 28 (1): 3–22.
Haralambides, H.E., Cariou, P. and Benacchio, M. (2002) Costs, benefits and pricing of dedicated container terminals. International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (1): 21–34.
Hong Kong Marine Department. (2008) Port and maritime statistics, http://www.mardep.gov.hk/en/publication/pdf/portstat_2_y_b3.pdf.
Informa UK Ltd. (1996–2007) Containerisation International Yearbook. London: Informa Group PLC.
Informa UK Ltd. (2008) http://www.ci-online.co.uk.
Lam, J.S.L. (2011a) Patterns of maritime supply chains: Slot capacity analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (2): 366–374.
Lam, J.S.L. (2011b) Scenario analysis for supply chain integration in container shipping. Maritime Policy and Management (accepted).
Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2006) A measurement and comparison of cost competitiveness of container ports in Southeast Asia. Transportation 33 (6): 641–654.
Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2008) Competition for transhipment containers by major ports in Southeast Asia: Slot capacity analysis. Maritime Policy and Management 35 (1): 89–101.
Lee, L.H., Chew, E.P. and Lee, L.S. (2006) Multicommodity network flow model for Asia's container ports. Maritime Policy and Management 33 (4): 387–402.
Luo, M. and Grigalunas, T. (2003) A spatial-economic multimodal transportation simulation model for US coastal container ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5: 158–178.
Magala, M. and Sammons, A. (2008) A new approach to port choice modelling. Maritime Economics and Logistics 10 (1/2): 9–34.
Malchow, M. and Kanafani, A. (2001) A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection. Maritime Policy and Management 28 (3): 265–277.
Mourao, M.C., Pato, M.V. and Paixao, A.C. (2002) Ship assignment with hub and spoke constraints. Maritime Policy and Management 29 (2): 135–150.
Notteboom, T. (2002) Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry. Maritime Policy and Management 29 (3): 257–269.
Ocean Shipping Consultants Ltd. (2003) World Containerport Outlook to 2015. Chertsey, UK: Ocean Shipping Consultants.
Paixao, A.C. and Marlow, P.B. (2003) Fourth generation ports – A question of agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management 33 (4): 355–376.
Panayides, P.M. and Song, D.W. (2009) Port integration in global supply chains: Measures and implications for maritime logistics. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 12 (2): 133–145.
Robinson, R. (1998) Asian hub/feeder nets: The dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Policy and Management 25 (1): 21–40.
Robinson, R. (2002) Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management 29 (3): 241–255.
Sachish, A. (1996) Productivity functions as a managerial tool in Israeli ports. Maritime Policy and Management 23 (4): 341–369.
Sanchez, R.J., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G.V., Sgut, M. and Wilmsmeier, G. (2003) Port efficiency and international trade: Port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5 (2): 199–218.
Seaports Publications Group. (2008) Advertising information 2008–2009 Shenzhen port directory, http://www.seaportsinfo.com/shenzhenport/shenzhenportdir.pdf.
Shenzhen port net. (2009) http://www.szport.net/.
Song, D.W. and Yeo, K.T. (2004) A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Economics and Logistics 6 (1): 34–52.
Tiwari, P., Itoh, H. and Doi, M. (2003) Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: A discrete choice analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5: 23–39.
Van de Voorde, E. and Winkelmans, W. (2002) A general introduction to port competition and management. In: M. Huybrechts, H. Meersman, E. van de Voorde, E. van Hooydonk, A. Verbeke and W. Winkelmans (eds.) Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports. Antwerp, Belgium: De Boeck, pp. 1–16.
Veldman, S.J. and Bückmann, E.H. (2003) A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container hub-ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5 (1): 3–22.
Yang, Z. (1999) Analysis of container port policy by the reaction of an equilibrium shipping market. Maritime Policy and Management 26 (4): 369–381.
Yap, W.Y. and Lam, J.S.L. (2004) An interpretation of inter-container port relationships from the demand perspective. Maritime Policy and Management 31 (4): 337–355.
Yap, W.Y. and Lam, J.S.L. (2006) Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia. Transportation Research Part A 40: 35–51.
Yap, W.Y., Lam, J.S.L. and Notteboom, T. (2006) Developments in container port competition in East Asia. Transport Reviews 26 (2): 167–188.
Zeng, Z.B. and Yang, Z. (2002) Dynamic programming of port position and scale in the hierarchised container ports network. Maritime Policy and Management 29 (2): 163–177.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Editors of MEL and the reviewers. An earlier version of the article was presented in WCTR 2010. We wish to express our gratitude to the conference organizers and maritime track coordinators for including the article in this special issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lam, J., Yap, W. Container port competition and complementarity in supply chain systems: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta. Marit Econ Logist 13, 102–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.5