Skip to main content
Log in

Linking growth to performance: Insights from shipping line groups

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

Despite the interest shown by many authors in ocean carriers’ strategies and operations, only a few contributions have tried to evaluate the impact of growth strategies on firms’ performance and profitability. This article, adopting a holistic approach, measures the impact of growth strategies on economic and financial performances that ultimately lead to value creation for shipping lines and their stakeholders. The sampled ocean carriers, controlling over 55 per cent of the overall fleet capacity, belong to 16 listed shipowning groups. The study has been carried out by performing correlation and regression analysis. Empirical outcomes reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between the amount of resources invested in assets and firm profitability, measured by return on assets (ROA). In fact, after a certain threshold of increasing asset (book) value, the positive returns decline. The multiple regression model also shows ROA to be positively correlated with vessel size, both in average and growth rate terms. The article, by addressing the complexity and multi-dimensionality of variables affecting firm performance, provides a pioneering and exploratory contribution on a topic that has received little attention in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R.C. and Reeb, D.M. (2003) Funding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance 58 (3): 1301–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I. (1965) Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis, N. and Sorros, J. (2010) Disaggregated earnings and stock prices: Evidence from international listed shipping firms. International Advances in Economic Research 16 (3): 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, M. (1989) Intermodalism and liner shipping intermodal approach. Transportation Practitioner’s Journal 56 (2): 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1967) Business Behaviour, Value and Growth. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E. and Welsch, R.E. (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M.C. (1976) The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. London, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canbäck, S. and Samouel, P. (2006) Do diseconomies of scale impact firm size and performance? A theoretical and empirical overview. Journal of Managerial Economics 4 (1): 27–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariou, P. (2008) Liner shipping strategies: An overview. International Journal of Ocean Systems Management 1 (1): 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. (1975) Diversification, Foreign Investment, and Scale in North American Manufacturing Industries. Ottawa, Canada: Economic Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipty, T. (1995) Horizontal integration for bargaining power: Evidence from the cable television industry. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4 (2): 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J.J. and Page, T.J. (1988) An examination of the relative impact of growth strategies on profit performance. European Journal of Marketing 22 (1): 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. and Khanna, M. (1999) Economies of scale in large container ships. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33 (2): 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F. (1997) Measuring growth: Methodological considerations and empirical results. In: R. Donckels and A. Miettinen (eds.) Entrepreneurship and SME Research: On its Way to the Next Millennium. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., Davidsson, P. and Gartner, W.B. (2003) Arriving at the high growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2): 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, B.S., Davis-Sramek, B. and Goldsby, T.J. (2009) Operational collaboration between shippers and carriers in the transportation industry. International Journal of Logistics Management 20 (3): 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusillo, M. (2009) Structural factors underlying mergers and acquisitions in liner shipping. Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (2): 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, B.T. (1972) Market Share and Rate of Return. Review of Economics and Statistics 54 (November): 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J.M., Beamish, P.W. and da Costa, R.C. (1989) Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal 10 (2): 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1999) The size economies and network efficiency of large containerships. International Journal of Maritime Economics 1 (1): 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M.G. (1998) Stability and competition in intermodal container shipping: Finding a balance. Maritime Policy & Management 25 (2): 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammenos, C. and Arkoulis, A. (2001) The long run performance of shipping initial public offerings. International Journal of Maritime Economics 1 (1): 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33 (3): 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, L.K. and Welsh, H.P. (2001) The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5): 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Jr J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings, 4th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. and Weiss, L. (1967) Firm size and profitability. The Review of Economics and Statistics 49 (3): 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralambides, H.E. and Veenstra, A.W. (2000) Modelling performance in liner shipping. In: D.A. Hensher and K.J. Button (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modelling. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, pp. 643–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K.R. (1984) Formulating vertical integration strategies. Academy of Management Review 9 (4): 638–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawawini, G., Subramanian, V. and Verdin, P. (2003) Is performance driven by industry- or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic Management Journal 24 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoetker, G. and Mellewigt, T. (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal 30 (10): 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G.T., Ketchen, J., David, J. and Slater, S.F. (2005) Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal 26 (12): 1173–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaen, F.R. and Baumann, H.D. (2003) Firm size, employees and profitability in US manufacturing industries, 13 January. Available at SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=382402 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.382402, accessed 21 March 2011.

  • Kogut, B. (1988) Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9 (4): 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J.S., Yap, W.Y. and Cullinane, K. (2007) Structure, conduct and performance on the major liner shipping routes. Maritime Policy & Management 34 (4): 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertides, N. and Louca, C. (2008) Ownership structure and operating performance: Evidence from the European Maritime Industry. Maritime Policy & Management 35 (4): 295–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.T. (1985) The transactions cost approach to vertical integration: An empirical examination. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 438–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P. (2001) Strategic re-thinking in shipping companies. Maritime Policy & Management 28 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P. and Fjeldstad, Ø.D. (2011) New business models and strategies in shipping. In: W.K. Talley (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, pp. 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lun, Y.H.V., Pang, K.W. and Panayides, P.M. (2010) Organizational growth and firm performance in the international container shipping industry. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 2 (2): 206–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.H. (1985) Intermodal Freight Transportation. Westport, CT: Eno Foundation for Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C.C. and Williamson, P.J. (1994) Related diversification, core competence and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal 15 (Summer): 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, R.G. (1997) Bigger vessels: How big is too big? Maritime Policy & Management 24 (2): 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midoro, R., Musso, E. and Parola, F. (2005) Maritime liner shipping and the stevedoring industry: Market structure and competition strategies. Maritime Policy & Management 32 (2): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midoro, R. and Pitto, A. (2000) A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management 27 (1): 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1986) Porter’s (1980) generic strategies and performance: An empirical examination with American data. Part II: Performance implications. Organisation Studies 7 (3): 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W., Shaver, J.M. and Yeung, B. (1992) Getting there in a global industry: impacts on performance of changing international presence. Strategic Management Journal 13 (6): 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1988) Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In: A.J. Auerbach (ed.) Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 101–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2004) Container shipping and ports: An overview. The Review of Network Economics 3 (2): 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., De Monie, G. and Rodrigue, J.-P. (2010) Organizational and geographical ramifications of the 2008–2009 financial crisis on the maritime shipping and port industries. In: P.V. Hall, B. McCalla, C. Comtois and B. Slack (eds.) Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P.M. (2003) Competitive strategies and organisational performance in ship management. Maritime Policy & Management 30 (2): 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P.M. and Cullinane, K. (2002) Competitive advantage in liner shipping: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (3): 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P.M., Lambertides, N. and Savva, C.S. (2011) The relative efficiency of shipping companies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 47 (5): 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parola, F., Lee, S.-W. and Ferrari, C. (2006) On the integration of logistics activities by shipping lines: The case of East-Asia. Journal of International Logistics and Trade 4 (1): 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. (2002) Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19 (2–3): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleshko, L.P. and Souiden, N. (2003) The profit effects of product-market growth strategy: A financial services example. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 7 (3): 258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (3): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G., Khoury, T.A., Peng, M.W. and Qian, Z. (2010) The performance implications of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification. Strategic Management Journal 31 (9): 1018–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selviaridis, K. and Spring, M. (2007) Third-party logistics: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Logistics Management 18 (1): 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Kumar, M.V. (2009) The relationship between product and international diversification: The effects of short-run constraints and endogeneity. Strategic Management Journal 30 (1): 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrom, W. (1989) Collusion in ocean shipping: A test of monopoly and empty core models. Journal of Political Economy 97 (5): 1160–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B., Comtois, C. and McCalla, R. (2002) Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: A global perspective. Maritime Policy & Management 29 (1): 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S.F. (1989) A comment: An examination of the relative impact of growth strategies on profit performance. European Journal of Marketing 23 (6): 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, G., Evans, P. and Shulman, L.E. (1992) Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 70 (2): 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, M. (2009) Maritime Economics, III edn. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, J. and White, D. (1993) When and when not to vertically integrate. Sloan Management Review 34 (3): 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syriopoulos, T. (2008) Financing Greek shipping: Modern instruments, methods and markets. In: A. Pallis (ed.) Maritime Transport: The Greek Paradigm, Research in Transportation Economics Series. London, UK: Elsevier Publisher, pp. 171–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syriopoulos, T. and Theotokas, I. (2007) Value creation through corporate destruction? Corporate governance in shipping takeovers. Maritime Policy & Management 34 (4): 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1987) The Competitive Challenge. Boston, MA: Bollinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, H., Volberda, H. and Eikelboom, S. (2004) Longevity in services: The case of the Dutch warehousing companies 1600–2000, ERIM Report Series ‘Research in Management’, August, Rotterdam, NL: Erasmus University Rotterdam, pp. 1–40.

  • Venkatrama, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986) Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 801–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1981) The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A. and Covin, J.G. (1993) Business strategy, technology policy, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 14 (6): 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zook, C. (2004) Beyond the Core: Expand your Market without Abandoning your Roots. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Satta, G., Parola, F., Ferrari, C. et al. Linking growth to performance: Insights from shipping line groups. Marit Econ Logist 15, 349–373 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.9

Keywords

Navigation