Skip to main content
Log in

Measures of supply chain collaboration in container logistics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

Why do container ports and related maritime logistics organisations collaborate? Despite increasing research into supply chain collaboration (SCC), few valid and reliable instruments are available to measure accurately and objectively the multiple dimensions of SCC in maritime logistics contexts. This research aims to introduce SCC into maritime logistics as an intermediary supply chain process. It adopts comprehensive, rigorous and systematic procedures including item review, Q-sorting, pilot testing and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to develop and validate SCC measures. Practical instruments comprised 23 measures derived from a large-scale survey of 178 South Korean maritime logistics professionals. Empirical results indicate that a proposed model of SCC is statistically consistent, reliable and valid. Information sharing, knowledge creation, goal similarity, decision harmonisation and joint supply chain performance measurement were identified as factors that underpin SCC between ports and port users such as shipping lines, inland transport companies, freight forwarders, ship management companies and third-party logistics companies. This work extends the concept of SCC into maritime logistics, and offers managers insights into a self-diagnostic tool to shape effective collaborative relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeles, R. and Nath, R. (2001) Partner congruence in electronic data interchange (EDI) enabled relationships. Journal of Business Logistics 22 (2): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y. and Phillips, L.W. (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3): 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichou, K. and Gray, R. (2004) A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement. Maritime Policy & Management 31 (1): 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, V. and De Martino, M. (2003) The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: An empirical analysis. Maritime Policy & Management 30 (4): 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, V. and Gouvernal, E. (2007) Supply chain and supply chain management: Appropriate concepts for maritime studies. In: J. Wang., D. Olivier., T. Notteboom and B. Slack (eds.) Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T.C.E. and Choy, P.W.C. (2007) Measuring success factors of quality management in the shipping industry. Maritime Economics & Logistics 9 (3): 234–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T.C.E. and Choy, P.W.C. (2013) A study of the relationships between quality management practices and organizational performance in the shipping industry. Maritime Economics & Logistics 15 (1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C.J., Blackburn, J.D. and Van Wassenhove, L.V. (1999) Partnerships to improve supply chains. Sloan Management Review 40 (4): 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, M. and Morvillo, A. (2008) Activities, resources and inter-organizational relationships: Key factors in port competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management 35 (6): 571–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, C., Parola, F. and Morchio, E. (2006) Southern European ports and the spatial distribution of EDCs. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (1): 60–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, E. (1999) The economics of total trans-ocean supply chain management. International Journal of Maritime Economics 1 (1): 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C., Zheng, J., Johnsen, T. and Lamming, R. (2004) A conceptual model for researching the creation and operation of supply networks. British Journal of Management 15 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, T.D. (2011) Coordination in multi-actor logistics operations: Challenges at the port interface. In: P. Hall, R.J. McCalla, C. Comtois and B. Slack (eds.) Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors. Surrey, UK: Ashgate, pp. 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, T.D. (2014) Increased collaborative relationships in international logistics: Canadian and other national and corporate examples. Maritime Policy & Management Forthcoming. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.873547.

  • Islam, D.M.Z., Dinwoodie, J. and Roe, M. (2005) Towards supply chain integration through multimodal transport in developing economies: The case of Bangladesh. Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (4): 382–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review 38 (3): 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-W., Park, N.-K. and Lee, D.-W. (2003) A simulation study for the logistics planning of a container terminal in view of SCM. Maritime Policy & Management 30 (3): 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. and Hocevar, D. (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin 97 (3): 562–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, S., Roath, A.S., Daugherty, P.J., Genchev, S.E., Chen, H. and Arndt, A.D. (2005) Supply chain collaboration: What’s happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management 16 (2): 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, H.-S. and Song, D.-W. (2011) Defining maritime logistics hub and its implication for container port. Maritime Policy & Management 38 (3): 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paixão, A.C. and Marlow, P.B. (2003) Fourth generation ports – A question of agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 33 (4): 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P.M. (2006) Maritime logistics and global supply chains: Towards a research agenda. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P.M. and Song, D.-W. (2009) Port integration in global supply chains: Measures and implications for maritime logistics. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 12 (2): 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P.M. and Song, D.-W. (2013) Maritime logistics as an emerging discipline. Maritime Policy & Management 20 (3): 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, Y.-J., Dinwoodie, J. and Roe, M. (2013) Co-opetition for collaborative advantage in supply chains involving maritime organisations. Paper presented at the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Annual Conference; 3–5 July, Marseille, France.

  • Simatupang, T.M. and Sridharan, R. (2005) The collaborative index: A measure for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 35 (1): 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, D. (1993) Pawns in the game: Ports in a global transportation system. Growth and Change 24 (4): 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D.-W. and Lee, E.-S. (2012) Coopetitive networks, knowledge acquisition and maritime logistics value. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 15 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stank, T.P., Keller, S.B. and Daugherty, P.J. (2001) Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business Logistics 22 (1): 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talley, W.K. (2007) Port performance: An economics perspective. In: M.R. Brookes and K. Cullinane (eds.) Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2004) Assessment of a Seaport Land Interface: An Analytical Framework. UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/MISC/2004/3. New York: United Nations.

  • UNCTAD. (2013) Review of Maritime Transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2013. New York: United Nations.

  • Van Der Horst, M.R. and De Langen, P.W. (2008) Coordination in hinterland transport chains: A major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics and Logistics 10 (1–2): 108–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitsounis, T.K. and Pallis, A.A. (2012) Port value chains and the role of interdependencies. In: D.-W. Song and P.M. Panayides (eds.) Maritime Logistics: Contemporary Issues. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, pp. 155–173.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Cao, G., Fynes, B. and McKittrick, A. (2010) Collaborative supply chain practices and performance: Exploring the key role of information quality. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 15 (6): 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, S.-H., Pettit, S. and Beresford, A.K.C. (2011) Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments. Maritime Economics & Logistics 13 (3): 250–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, W. and Lee, G. (2005) Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information System 22 (1): 45–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Tabke A1

Table A1 Measurements of port performance

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, YJ., Dinwoodie, J. & Roe, M. Measures of supply chain collaboration in container logistics. Marit Econ Logist 17, 292–314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2014.26

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2014.26

Keywords

Navigation