TABLE 5
FROM:
The Time Factor in Liner Shipping Services
Theo E Notteboom
BACK TO ARTICLETable 5. Some examples of shipping lines' direct interest in European terminals (Summer 2005)
| Shipping line or related company | Terminals | Status |
|---|---|---|
| APM terminals | APM Terminals Rotterdam (100%) | In operation since 2000 |
| North Sea Terminal Bremerhaven (50%) | In operation | |
| Medcenter–Gioia Tauro (33.3%) | In operation | |
| Muelle Juan Carlos I–Algeciras (100%) | In operation | |
| Aarhus (100%) | In operation | |
| APM Contstanza Terminal (100%) | In operation | |
| Zeebrugge | Terminal open in 2006 | |
| Dunkirk | Development | |
| MSC | MSC Home Terminal–Antwerp (joint venture with PSA) | Operating since 2003 |
| Le Havre (joint-venture with Terminaux de Normandie) | Upgraded in 2004–2005 | |
| Under development | ||
| Hapag-Lloyd | Altenwerder Terminal–Hamburg (minority stake of 25.1%) | In operation since 2002 |
| CMA-CGM | Port Synergy (joint venture with P&O Ports) with terminals in Le Havre, Marseille and Marsaxlokk | In operation |
| 35% shareholding in Container Handling Zeebrugge (OHZ) | Since July 2005 | |
| CMA-CGM Cosco Pacific P&O Nedlloyd | Minority shareholdings in Antwerp Gateway (other shareholders: P&O Ports and Duisport) | Operations started in September 2005 |
| P&O Nedlloyd | Euromax Terminal Rotterdam (joint-venture with ECT) | To be seen given take-over by Maersk Sealand |
Source: Based on carrier data
