Maritime Economic Logistics

TABLE 2

FROM:

The Time Scale of Internationalisation: The Case of the Container Port Industry

Daniel Olivier, Francesco Parola, Brian Slack and James J Wang

BACK TO ARTICLE

Table 2. Leading 20 TNCs in the container terminal industry, 2005

Figure and tables index
TNC Country of origina Number of terminal projects in operation Million TEU 2005
1* Hutchison Port Holdingsb Hong Kong4451.8
2* APM Terminalsc Denmark4742.9
3* PSA Internationalb Singapore2540.3
4* China Merchants Holdings Int.Hong Kong1224.5
5* P&O Portsd UK3023.8
6* COSCO PacificHong Kong2014.7
7* Dubai Ports Worldc UAE1412.9
8* Eurogate/Eurokai GroupGermany1212.1
9# Evergreen Marine Corp.Taiwan138.7
10# Mediterranean Shipping Co.Switzerland137.8
11* SSA MarineUS117.3
12* New World Holdingse Hong Kong65.4
13* Hamburger Hafen LAGermany76.0
14# NOL/APLSingapore95.7
15* Modern Terminals Ltd.Hong Kong55.0
16# Hanjin ShippingSouth Korea114.9
17# OOCLf Hong Kong64.3
18# NYK LineJapan114.2
19* DragadosSpain103.6
20# CMA-CGMFrance73.4

a Hong Kong, Taiwan and China are considered separate political entities.

b PSA International acquired 20% of Hutchison Port Holdings (HPH) in 2006.

c APM Terminals figures include former P&O Nedlloyd port network.

d Dubai Ports World acquired P&O Ports in March 2006. But, in December 2006, the former P&O Ports North America division (six terminal facilities in the US) was sold by DPW to a US corporation, AIG Global Investment Group.

e Data is for 2003.

f In November 2006 OOIL, parent company of OOCL, sold four of its North American terminals (except the facility in Long Beach) to the Ontaorio Teachers Pension Fund.

  *=ITOs #=Ocean carriers.

  Source: Drewry, 2006; company annual reports; authors own database.

Figure and tables index
BACK TO ARTICLE