Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency in Chinese seaports: 2002–2012

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article assesses the impacts of cost and operational variables on major Chinese ports by means of a stochastic frontier model on a panel data from 2002 to 2012. More precisely, both random and fixed-effect stochastic models are used in the analyses to cross-validate the results. Findings suggest that there is considerable heterogeneity in China’s seaports, affecting their cost efficiency estimation. Moreover, remote port locations are shown to exhibit lower efficiency, while larger ports appear to be more efficient. Port heterogeneity is therefore shown to be a policy criterion the importance of which could in no way be understated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ablanedo-Rosas, J.H., Gao, H., Zheng, X., Alidaee, B. and Wang, H. (2010) A study of the relative efficiency of Chinese ports: A financial ratio-based data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Systems 27(5): 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.A. and Schmidt, P. (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6(1): 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B.H. (1995) Economic Analysis of Panel Data. Tangier, NS: Willy & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baños Pino, J., Coto Millan, P. and Rodriguez Alvarez, A. (1999) Allocative efficiency and over-capitalisation: An application. International Journal of Transport Economics 2: 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science 32(10): 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C.P. (2003a) Incentive regulation and efficiency of Portuguese port authorities. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5(1): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C.P. (2003b) The measurement of efficiency of Portuguese seaport authorities with DEA. International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. XXX, nº. 3.

  • Barros, C.P. (2005) Decomposing growth in Portuguese seaports: A frontier cost approach. Maritime Economics & Logistics 7(4)315.

  • Barros, C.P. and Athanassiou, M. (2004) Efficiency in European seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6(2): 122–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C.P. and Peypoch, N. (2007) Comparing productivity change in Italian and Portuguese Seaports using the Luenberger indicator approach. Maritime Economics & Logistics 9(2): 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. (2012) Productivity assessment of African seaports. African Development Review 24(1): 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C.P., Felício, J.A. and Fernandes, R.L. (2012) Productivity analysis of Brazilian seaports. Maritime Policy & Management 39(5): 503–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C.P. and Garcia-del-Barrio, P. (2008) Efficiency measurement of the English football premier league with a random frontier model. Economic Modelling 25(5): 994–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C., Haralambides, H., Hussain, M. and Peypoch, N. (2011) 17 seaport efficiency and productivity growth. International Handbook of Maritime Economics: 363–383.

  • Barros, C.P. and Peypoch, N. (2012) Productivity assessment of African seaports with biased technological change. Transportation Planning and Technology 35(6): 663–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1992) Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis 3(1–2): 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E and Coelli, T.J. (1988) Prediction of firm level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics 38(3): 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergantino, A.S. and Musso, E. (2011) The role of external factors versus managerial ability in determining seaports’ relative efficiency: An input-by-input analysis through a multi-step approach on a panel of Southern European ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 13(2): 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichou, K. (2011) A two-stage supply chain DEA model for measuring container-terminal efficiency. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 3(1): 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, X., Dollar, D. and Micco, A. (2004) Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade. Journal of Development Economics 75(2): 417–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coto Millan, P., Baños Pino, J. and Rodrigues Alvarez, A. (1999) Allocative Efficiency and Over-Capitalization: an Application. International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. XXVI, Nº. 2.

  • Cullinane, K. and Song, D.W. (2001) The administrative and ownership structure of Asian container ports. International Journal of Maritime Economics 3(2): 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K.P.B. and Song, D.W. (2003) A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of the Korean container terminals. Applied Economics 35(3): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinanne, K.P.B., Wang, T.F., Song, D.W. and ji, P. (2006) The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research part A 40(4): 354–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K.P.B., Song, D.W. and Gray, R. (2002) A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: Assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures. Transportation Research Part A 36(8): 743–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Song, D.W. and Wang, T. (2005) The application of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 24: 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. and Wang, T.F. (2007) Port governance in China. Research in Transportation Economics 17(15): 331–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Wang, T.F., Song, D.W. and Ji, P. (2006) The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part A 40(4): 354–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, G.F. and Cariou, P. (2011) A DEA study of the efficiency of 122 iron ore and coal ports and of 15/17 countries in 2005. Maritime Policy & Management 38(7): 727–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., Gonzaléz, M. and Trujillo, L. (2001) Efficiency gains from port reforms and the potential for yardstick competition: Lessons from México. World Development 30(11): 1885–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2004) Distinguishing between heterogeneity and inefficiency: Stochastic frontier analysis of the world health organization’s panel data on national health care systems. Health Economics 13(10): 959–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2005a) Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis 23(1): 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2005b) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics 126(2): 269–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2008) Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters 99(3): 585–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., Knox Lovell, C.A., Materov, I.S. and Schmidt, P. (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19(2): 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, O.R., Lin, K., Yang, H. and Ruth, B. (2011) Sea-port operational efficiency: An evaluation of five Asian ports using stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Service Science and Management 4(3): 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. and Lovell, K.C.A. (2000) Stochastic Frontier Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (1995) The comparative performance of public and private enterprises. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 29(3): 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Managi, S. (2007) Maritime shipping industry and productivity in Japan. Maritime Economics & Logistics 9(4): 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Budria, E., Diaz Armas, R., Navarro Ibáñez, M. and Ravelo Mesa, T. (1999) A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics XXVI(2): 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medda, F. and Liu, Q. (2013) Determinants and strategies for the development of container terminals. Journal of Productivity Analysis 40(1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. and Van den Broeck, J. (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review: 435–444.

  • McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000) Mixed mnl models of discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.K. and De, P. (2004) An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6(1): 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, Y. and Hayuth, Y. (1993) Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy and Management 20: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P.H. (1973) The expansion of firms. Journal of Political Economy 81(4): 936–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. (1991) How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal 12(2): 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simões, P., Carvalho, P., Fonseca, A. and Marques, R.C. (2010) Governance and comparative performance of Iberian Peninsula seaports: An application of non-parametric techniques. International Journal of Transport Economics 37(1): 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões, P. and Marques, R.C. (2010a) Influence of congestion efficiency on the European seaports performance: Does it matter? Transport Reviews 30(4): 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simões, P. and Marques, R.C. (2010b) Seaport performance analysis using robust non-parametric efficiency estimators. Transportation Planning and Technology 33(5): 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talley, W.K. (2006) An economic theory of the port. Research in Transportation Economics 16(22): 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, J. (2001) Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part A 35(2): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, J. and Heng, W. (2005) Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminal). Transportation Research Part A 39(5): 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, H., Windle, R. and Dresner, M. (2004) North America container port productivity, 1984–1997. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 40(4): 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1987) Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approachW.W. Norton & Co.: N.Y.

  • Wang, H.J. and Ho, C.H. (2010) Estimating fixed effects panel data stochastic frontier models by model transformation. Journal of Econometrics 157(2): 286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.J., Ng, A.K.Y. and Olivier, D. (2004) Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices. Transport Policy 11(3): 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, University of Lisbon, Rua Miguel Lupi, 20, Lisbon, 1249-078, Portugal

    Carlos Pestana Barros

  2. School of Economics, Jinan University, Huangpu Road 601, Guangzhou, China

    Zhongfei Chen

  3. COPPEAD Graduate Business School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Paschoal Lemme, 355, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21949-900, Brazil

    Peter Wanke

Authors
  1. Carlos Pestana Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongfei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Wanke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Pestana Barros.

Appendix

Appendix

Figure A1

Figure A1
figure 2

The location and map of Chinese seaports.

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barros, C., Chen, Z. & Wanke, P. Efficiency in Chinese seaports: 2002–2012. Marit Econ Logist 18, 295–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.4

Keywords

Search

Navigation