Scientific advice to governments

Guest Editors: Sir Peter Gluckman (Chief Science Advisor to the Prime Minister of New Zealand & Chair, International Network for Government Science Advice) and Professor James Wilsdon (Professor of Research Policy, Department of Politics and Director of Impact and Engagement, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK).

Scientific advice to governments has never been in greater demand; nor has it been more contested. From climate change to cyber-security, poverty to pandemics, food technologies to fracking, the questions being asked of scientists, engineers and other experts by policymakers, the media and the wider public continue to multiply and increase in complexity. At the same time, the authority and legitimacy of experts are under increasing scrutiny, particularly on controversial topics, such as climate change and genetically modified crops.

This article collection brings together perspectives on the theory, practice and politics of scientific advice that build on the conclusions of the landmark conference in Auckland in August 2014, which led to the creation of the International Network for Government Science Advice (INGSA).

This collection was formally launched at the INGSA summit (September 29-30th, Brussels), organised in partnership with the European Commission.

Editors' Foreword

Comment | 26th September 2016
From paradox to principles: where next for scientific advice to governments?
Peter Gluckman and James Wilsdon

Articles published to date

Article | 20th September 2016
Providing a “challenge function”: Government social researchers in the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010–2015)
Michael Kattirtzi
Article | 6th September 2016
Temporal and spatial dimensions in the management of scientific advice to governments
Marc Saner
Article | 6th September 2016
Exploring the science–policy interface on climate change: The role of the IPCC in informing local decision-making in the UK
Candice Howarth & James Painter
Article | 2nd August 2016
Reflections on science advisory systems in Canada
Remi Quirion, Arthur Carty, Paul Dufour & Ramia Jabr
Article | 2nd August 2016
The Rothschild report (1971) and the purpose of government-funded R&D—a personal account
Miles Parker
Article | 12th July 2016
Scientific advice in China: the changing role of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xiaoxuan Li, Kejia Yang & Xiaoxi Xiao
Article | 5th July 2016
Exploring the scope of science advice: social sciences in the UK government
Adam CG Cooper
Article | 14th June 2016
Scientific advice on the move: the UK mobile phone risk issue as a public experiment
Jack Stilgoe
Comment | 7th June 2016
The evolving role of the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in providing science and technology policy advice to the US government
Peter D Blair
Article | 7th June 2016
Five years after Fukushima: scientific advice in Japan
Yasushi Sato & Tateo Arimoto
Article | 7th June 2016
Revealing a paradox in scientific advice to governments: the struggle between modernist and reflexive logics within the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Eva-Maria Kunseler
Article | 10th May 2016
Science, technology and innovation indicators in policy-making: the Nigerian experience
Willie Siyanbola, Adedamola Adeyeye, Olawale Olaopa & Omowumi Hassan
Article | 10th May 2016
Ensuring science is useful, usable and used in global disaster risk reduction and sustainable development: a view through the Sendai framework lens
Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Kevin Blanchard & Virginia Murray

Related content

Nature archive

A collection of expert comment, news and features on science advice to governments from the leading international journal of science; access all articles here