Skip to main content
Log in

Place branding from a multi-level perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proceeds from the basic assumption that place branding is a place-creating process. Its main argument, however, is that these acts of place creation must be understood from a multi-level perspective. To substantiate this argument, the author provides empirical evidence from four spatial levels, namely, a neighbourhood, a municipality, a functional region and a county in Sweden. The empirical data show that at all these four levels place-branding actors use two particular techniques – spatial positioning and spatial anchorage – in order to communicate the space they wish to promote. The techniques of anchorage and positioning create a complex web of branded places, which, the author argues, can be understood only from a multi-level perspective on place branding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The methodological territorialism referred to is certainly not a problem only for place-branding research. Brenner (2004, p. 8) cites ‘urban studies, regional studies, comparative politics, international relations’ to show that social scientific research quite generally tends to be ‘organised according to distinctive scalar foci’.

  2. SCB (2007).

  3. A functional region could be understood as a space ‘characterised by a high frequency of intraregional interaction’ (Karlsson and Olsson, 2006). Whether Fourth City Region really qualifies as a functional region is an ontological question that is not answered here.

  4. www.fjarde.se/296.html.

  5. www.ostsam.se/fakta/C_1.asp.

  6. The governmental structure of Östergötland is, as in many other Swedish counties, somewhat complicated. The County Council (landsting) is a public body, governed by a popularly elected board. Although the county council can be described as the intermediate decision-making level in Sweden, the county council has no authority over the municipalities. The responsibilities of the county council are also largely restricted to public health and certain other matters that are too costly for the municipalities to manage individually. These ‘other matters’ are, however, delegated to the Regional Development Council, Östsam, in which all 13 municipalities in Östergötland and the county council are enlisted as members. As well as the county council, the County Administrative Board (länstyrelsen) needs to be mentioned. This is a central government agency, supposed to function as the representative of the Swedish Parliament and the central government at the regional level. However, it also has ‘a parliamentary mandate to work for the county's best interests’. See http://www.lst.se/english/society.htm.

  7. Elsewhere, Mary Ann Tétreault (1998) has used the concept of meta-space somewhat differently.

  8. www.enkoping.se/, 8 July 2008.

  9. www.pitea.se/ext_Templates/default.aspx?id=20181&epslanguage=SV, 8 July 2008.

  10. www.katrineholm.se/upload/Bes%C3percnt;B6ksguidepercnt;20delpercnt;201.pdf, 8 July 2008.

  11. Agenda Klockaretorpet (2007a) Klockrent Magazine, No.2, pp. 2–3; Interview 08.

  12. Agenda Klockaretorpet (2007a, pp. 6–7).

  13. Destination Norrköping (2006a); Norrköpings Kommun (2008b); Interview 01, 03, 04, 06, 07; Norrköpings Municipality (n.y., p. 2).

  14. Destination Norrköping (2006a, p. 6).

  15. Destination Norrköping mfl (2006b); Fjärde Storstadsregionen (n.y., p. 7); Marknadsbolagen (n.y., p. 10).

  16. Fjärde Storstadsregionen (n.y., p. 6).

  17. Destination Norrköping mfl (2006b); Konkurrenskraftiga regioner i en globalisorad värld (2008).

  18. See Fjärde Storstadsregionen (n.y., p. 3).

  19. Marknadsbolagen (2002, pp. 4, 18; n.y., pp. 4–6).

  20. Interview 06.

  21. Interview 01; Interview 03; Interview 06.

  22. Interview 02.

  23. Östsam (2006a, pp. 6, 9, 14).

  24. Östsam (2006a, pp. 17–18); Interview 02.

  25. Östsam, Regionförbundet (2006a, pp. 13–14; 2006b, pp. 11, 15); Östsvenska turistrådet (2008, p. 6).

  26. Agenda Klockaretorpet (n.y.a, p. 1); Interview 08.

  27. Agenda Klockaretorpet (n.y.b, pp. 2, 4). See also Agenda Klockaretorpet and Studiefrämjandet (n.y.c, p. 2).

  28. Destination Norrköping (2006a); Norrköpings Kommunstyrelse (2007); Norrköpings Kommun (2008a); Norrköpings Kommun (2008b, p. 2).

  29. Norrköpings Kommun (2008a; 2008b, p. 3).

  30. Norrköpings Kommun (2008a).

  31. Norrköpings Kommun (2008a; 2008b, p. 3); Norrköpings Stadsbyggnadskontor (2007, p. 2).

  32. Destination Norrköping (2006a, p. 8); Stadsbyggnadskontor (2007) Nya staden. Norrköping, p. 3; Norrköpings Kommun (2008a).

  33. Marknadsbolagen (2006a; 2006b; n.y.); Fastighetsägardagen (2008); Hur bygger man en storstadsregion? (2008); Interview 01; Fjärde Storstadsregionen (n.y., p. 4).

  34. Interview 03; Interview 04.

  35. Fjärde Storstadsregionen (n.y., p. 6).

  36. Marknadsbolagen (2002, p. 3).

  37. Fourze (n.y., pp. 10–11).

  38. Marknadsbolagen (2002, pp. 7, 10, 12; 2006b; n.y., pp. 8, 9); Interview 01, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07.

  39. Marknadsbolagen (2002, p. 1; n.y., p. 8).

  40. Marknadsbolagen (2002, pp. 3, 10); Interview 03, Interview 04.

  41. Östsam, Regionförbundet (2006a, p. 56; pp. 54–56, 58; 2006b, pp. 7, 11); Östsvenska turistrådet (2008, pp. 3, 5); Interview 05.

  42. Östsam (2006a, p. 13); Interview 04.

  43. Östsvenska turistrådet (2008, p. 4).

  44. Östsvenska turistrådet (2008, p. 5); Interview 05.

  45. Östsam (2006b, p. 11).

References

  • Agnew, J. (1993) Representing space. In: J. Duncan and D. Ley (eds.) Place/Culture/Representation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldecoa, F. and Keating, M. (eds.) (1999) Paradiplomacy in Action. The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (2004) Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breuilly, J. (1994) Nationalism and the State. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces, Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brusman, M. (2008) Den verkliga staden?: Norrköpings innerstad mellan urbana idéer och lokala identiteter. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1997) Institutional reflexivity and the rise of the region state. In: G. Benko and U. Strohmayer (eds.) Space and Social Theory: Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deas, I. and Ward, K.G. (2000) From the ‘new localism’ to the ‘new regionalism’? The implications of regional development agencies for city-regional relations. Political Geography 19: 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ek, R. (2002) Vi skal iscensaettes vores by. In: T. O’Dell (ed.) Upplevelsens materialitet. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (1995) Toward the learning region. Futures 27 (5): 527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1983) Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E.F. (2007) City state: Critique of scalar thought. Citizenship Studies 11 (2): 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996) New ethnicities. In: D. Morley and K.H. Chen (eds.) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. (2000) Europeans Only? Essays on Identity Politics and the European Union. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldt Cassel, S. (2008) Platsmarknadsföring, regional image och jakten på attraktivitet. In: F. Andersson, R. Ek and I. Molina (eds.) Regionalpolitikens Geografi. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1990) Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Brenner, N. and Jones, M. (2008) Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D 26: 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C. and Olsson, M. (2006) The identification of functional regions: Theory, methods, and applications. The Annals of Regional Science 40 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. and Loughlin, J. (2002) Territorial Policy Communities and Devolution in the United Kingdom. Florence, Italy: European University Institute. EUI Working Papers, 2002/1.

  • Keating, M., Loughlin, J. and Deschouwer, K. (2003) Culture, Institutions and Economic Development. Cheltenham, Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khayati, K. (2008) From Victim Diaspora to Transnational Communities. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, R. (ed.) (1998) Regionen in der Europäischen Union, Beiträge zur Debatte. Berlin, Germany: Potsdamer Textbücher.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (2000) The learning region in an age of austerity: Capitalising on knowledge, entrepreneurialism, and reflexive capitalism. Geoforum 31 (2): 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. and Jones, M. (2001) Renewing the geography of regions. Environment and Planning D 19 (6): 669–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.B. (2001) Geography on the agenda 1. Progress in Human Geography 25 (5): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A.B. (2002) National claims to territory in the modern state system: Geographical considerations. Geopolitics 7 (2): 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2000) Building Europe, The Cultural Politics of European Integration. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syssner, J. (2006) What Kind of Regionalism? Regionalism and Region Building in Northern European Peripheries. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syssner, J. (2010) Platser, Människor, Visioner. In: L. Jonsson (ed.) Samhällsutveckling och Kulturarv. Lund, Sweden: Nordic Academic Press, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tétreault, M.A. (1998) Spheres of liberty, conflict and power: The public lives of private persons. Citizenship Studies 2 (2): 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therkelsen, A. and Halkier, H. (2004) Umbrella place branding. A study of friendly exoticism and exotic friendliness in coordinated national tourism and investment promotion. SPIRIT Discussion Paper, 26. Aalborg University.

  • Törnqvist, G. (1998) Renässans för Regioner. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

Documentary sources

  • Agenda Klockaretorpet. (2007a) Klockrent Magazine, No. 2.

  • Agenda Klockaretorpet. (n.y.a) Trygghet i Norrköping.

  • Agenda Klockaretorpet. (n.y.b) Hur vill du utvecklas som förälder?

  • Agenda Klockaretorpet and Studiefrämjandet. (n.y.c) Vi sätter de goda krafterna i rörelse.

  • Destination Norrköping. (2006a) Industrilandskapet. Norrköping.

  • Destination Norrköping mfl. (2006b) En region, två städer, tre arenor, tusen möjligheter. Norrköping.

  • Fjärde Storstadsregionen. (n.y.) Hur man bygger en ny storstadsregion, Norrköping & Linköping.

  • Fourze. (n.y.) Värdet av att våga återvända, Nr.2.

  • Marknadsbolagen Norrköping och Linköping. (2002) Linköping Norrköping – två städer en region.

  • Marknadsbolagen Norrköping och Linköping. (2006a) Bra draghjälp för Fjärde Storstadsregionen. Pressmeddelande.

  • Marknadsbolagen Norrköping och Linköping. (2006b) Nutek satsar på Fjärde Storstadsregionen. Pressmeddelande. 2006-07-03.

  • Marknadsbolagen Norrköping och Linköping. (n.y.) Mångfald.

  • Norrköpings Kommun. (2008a) Att bygga något stort tillsammans. Norrköping och Linköping utvecklar Fjärde Storstadsregionen.

  • Norrköpings Kommun. (2008b) Det goda livet finns i Norrköping – en framtidsvision, Norrköping.

  • Norrköpings Kommunstyrelse. (2007) Uppdragsplan till Näringslivskontoret, 2007-06-19.

  • Norrköpings Municipality. (n.y.) Norrköpings industrial landscape.

  • Norrköpings Stadsbyggnadskontor. (2007) Nya staden. Norrköping.

  • Östsvenska turistrådet. (2008) Strategi och Marknadsplan, Norrköping.

  • Östsam, Regionförbundet. (2006a) 76 sidor Östergötland, Linköping.

  • Östsam, Regionförbundet. (2006b) Östgötaregionen 2020. Regionalt Utvecklingsprogram, Linköping.

  • SCB. (2007) Topplista över Sveriges 50 största kommuner, 2007-12-31.

Web sources

Observations

  • Fastighetsägardagen. (2008) Seminar arranged by Fastighetsägarna. Linköping, 15 April 2008.

  • Hur bygger man en storstadsregion? (2008) Seminar arranged by Östsam Regionförbundet, Nutek, Linköpings and Norrköpings kommun. Linköping, 14 March 2008.

  • Konkurrenskraftiga regioner i en globaliserad värld. (2008) Seminar arranged by Globaliseringsrådet and Fjärde Storstadsregionen, 7 May 2008.

Interviews

  • Interview 01, 20 March 2008.

  • Interview 02, 18 March 2008.

  • Interview 03, 2 April 2008.

  • Interview 04, 3 April 2008.

  • Interview 05, 7 April 2008.

  • Interview 06, 2 April 2008.

  • Interview 07, 16 May 2008.

  • Interview 08, 8 May 2008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josefina Syssner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Syssner, J. Place branding from a multi-level perspective. Place Brand Public Dipl 6, 36–48 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.1

Keywords

Navigation