Abstract
European integration has led to an increase in international contact and the need for cooperation among European countries. Willingness to cooperate with other nations is dependent on mutual perceptions and evaluations, which find their expression in national images. One important dimension of these evaluations is trust. This article explores why nations trust one another. The article analyses whether a nation's cultural values influence its assumed trustworthiness when economic performance is controlled. It is hypothesized that nations that have achieved favourable international goals, for example embracing certain cultural values, earn appreciation and admiration. Thus, cultural success lends a special aura that makes these nations seem trustworthy. The social dimensions recorded in treaties provide a record of the specific cultural ideals embraced in Europe. Using data from the European Election Study, the European Values Survey and Eurostat, macro-level empirical analyses are conducted to test the hypothesis. Results indicate that the admiration mechanism has a clear effect on international trust. Thus, the author concludes that the cultural features of nations are important for their image and ascribed trustworthiness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alexander, M.G., Levin, S. and Henry, P.J. (2005) Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology 26 (1): 27–45.
Andersen, R. (1968) Behavioral Model of Families Use of Health Services. Chicago: Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago.
Anholt, S. (2010) Identity, Image and Reputation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Banfield, E.C. (1958) The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Chicago: The Free Press.
Billig, M. and Tajfel, H. (1973) Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 3 (1): 27–52.
Boulding, K.E. (1959) National images and international systems. The Journal Conflict Resolution 3 (2): 120–131.
Brewer, M.B. and Alexander, M.G. (2002) Intergroup emotions and images. In: D.M. Mackie and E.R. Smith (eds.) From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions. Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups. New York and Hove, UK: Psychology Press, pp. 209–226.
Delhey, J. (2005) A Trade-off between Enlargement and Integration? An Analysis of Trust between EU Nationalities. Techreport: Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB), SP I 2005(203).
Delhey, J. and Newton, K. (2005) Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern of Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review 21 (4): 311–327.
Devos, T., Silver, L.A., Mackie, D.M. and Smith, E.R. (2002) Experiencing intergroup emotions. In: D.M. Mackie and E.R. Smith (eds.) From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions. Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups. New York and Hove, UK: Psychology Press, pp. 111–134.
Dreher, J. and Stegmaier, P. (2007) Zur Unüberwindbarkeit Kultureller Differenz. Grundlagentheoretische Reflexionen, [Insuperableness of Cultural Differences. Theoretical Reflections] Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
European Election Studies. (2004) Dataset, http://www.ees-homepage.net/, accessed 5 February 2011.
European Values Study. (1999a) 3rd EVS wave 1999 (ZA3811), dataset, doi: 10.4232/1.10789; http://www.gesis.org/unser-angebot/datenanalysieren/umfragedaten/european-values-study/3rd-wave-19992000/, accessed 9 March 2011.
European Values Study. (1999b) 4th EVS wave 2008 (ZA4800), dataset, doi: 10.4232/1.11004; http://www.gesis.org/unser-angebot/datenanalysieren/umfragedaten/european-values-study/4thwave-2008/, accessed 22 August 2012.
European Union. (2010) Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. In: Official Journal of the European Union (C 83/13; date: 30.03.2010), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:0047:020:en:PDF, accessed 3 March 2011.
Eurostat. (2004a) GDP per capita in PPS, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=de&pcode=tec00114, accessed 5 February 2012.
Eurostat. (2004b) Total population, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&language=en&pcode=tps00001&tableSelection=1&footnotes=yes&labeling=labels&plugin=1, accessed 5 February 2012.
Fuchs, D. (1997) Welche Demokratie wollen die Deutschen? [Which democracy do the Germans wish?]. In: O.W. Gabriel (ed.) Politische Orientierungen und Verhaltensweisen im vereinigten Deutschland. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich, pp. 81–114.
Genna, G.M. (2009) Images of Europeans: In-group trust and support for European integration. Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association Eleventh Biennial Conference, 23–25 April 2009, Marina Del Rey, CA.
Herrmann, R.K. and Fischerkeller, M. (1995) Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: Cognitive-strategic research after the Cold War. International Organization 49 (3): 415–450.
Herrmann, R.K., Voss, S., Schooler, T.Y.E. and Garrochi, J. (1997) Images in inter-national relations: An experimental test of cognitive schemata. International Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 403–433.
Hofstede, G. (1992[1980]) Culture's Consequences. International differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hils, CA: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. and Hofstede, G.J. (2005) Lokales Denken, Globales Handeln. Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management, [Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations] München: dtv and Sage Publications.
Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R.F. (1991) Trust between nations: Primordial ties, societal learning and economic development. In: K. Reif and R.F. Inglehart (eds.) Eurobarometer. The Dynamics of European Public Opinion. Essays in Honour of Jacques-René Rabier. London and Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, pp. 145–185.
Inglehart, R.F. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R.F. (2004) Kultur und Demokratie [Culture and democracy]. In: S.P. Huntington and L.E. Harrison (eds.) Streit um Werte, [Disputes about Values] München: Goldmann, pp. 141–165.
Inglehart, R.F. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R.F. (2008) Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics 31 (1-2): 130–146.
Kleiner, T.-M. (2008) Das Vertrauen zu den politischen Entscheidungsinstitutionen junger Demokratien Mitteleuropas: Kulturalistische und institutionalistische Ansätze zur Erklärung politischen Vertrauens im Vergleich. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Kleiner, T.-M. (2012) Mechanische Solidarität als Schlüssel zur Integration Europas? Wie kulturelle Ähnlichkeiten zu wechselseitigem Vertrauen der europäischen Nationen führen [Mechanical solidarity as a key to European integration? How cultural similarities lead to mutual international trust in Europe]. In: H.-G. Soeffner (eds.) Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen: Verhandlungen des 35. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Frankfurt am Main 2010, [Transnational Collectivisation: Proceedings of the 35thGerman Congress for Sociology in Frankfurt am Main 2010] Wiesbaden: Springer VS, in press.
Kluckhohn, C. (1996 [1951]) Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. An exploration in definition and classification. In: T. Parsons (eds.) Toward a General Theory of Action, 4th edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 388–433.
Kuipers, G. (2012) The rise and decline of national habitus: Dutch cycling culture and the shaping of national similarity. European Journal of Social Theory 1 (1): 1–19.
Levy, M.J. (1972) Modernization: Latecomers and Survivors. New York and London: Basic Books.
Linton, R. (1999 [1947]) The Cultural Background of Personality. Mannheim, Germany: Routledge.
Marx, K. (2009 [1872]) Das Kapital. Köln: Anaconda.
Norris, P. (1999) Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rokeach, M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Schwartz, S.H. (2006) A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology 5 (2-3): 137–182.
Schwartz, S.H. and Ros, M. (1995) Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the Individualism-Collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology 1 (2): 91–122.
Smith, P.B. and Bond, M.H. (1993) Social Psychology across Cultures. Analysis and Perspectives. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Smith, R.J. (2008) In defense of national character. Theory & Psychology 18 (4): 465–482.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P. and Flament, C. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2): 149–178.
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. and Cairns, E. (2009) Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (1): 45–59.
Taylor, Ch. (2004) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Therborn, G. (1995) European Modernity and Beyond. The Trajectory of European Societies 1945–2000. London: Sage Publications.
Triandis, H.C. (1994) Culture and Social Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weber, M. (2004) Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus, [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism], 3rd edn. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
Williams, M. (2001) In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. The Academy of Management Review 26 (3): 377–396.
Williams Jr, R.M. (1972 [1968]) The concept of values. In: D.L. Sills (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: The Macmillan Company and The Free Press, pp. 283–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Items measuring cultural value orientations:
Attitudes towards authority reflecting autonomy
I’m going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a way of governing this country. For each one, would you say it is a very good, fairly good, fairly bad or very bad way of governing this country?
• Having a strong leader who does not have to bother with parliament and elections
• Having experts, not government, make decisions according to what they think is best for the country
• Having the army rule the country
1=very good; 4=very bad.
Support for democracy
I’m going to read off some things that people sometimes say about a democratic political system. Could you please tell me if you agree strongly, agree, disagree or disagree strongly, after I read each of them?
• Democracy may have some problems but it's better than any other form of government
1=disagree strongly; 4=agree strongly.
I’m going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a way of governing this country. For each one, would you say it is a very good, fairly good, fairly bad or very bad way of governing this country?’
• Having a democratic political system
1=very bad; 4=very good’.
Notions of role models and gender equality
People talk about the changing roles of men and women today. For each of the following statements I read out, can you tell me how much you agree with each. Please use the responses on this card:
• A pre-school child is likely to suffer if his or her mother works
• A job is alright but what most women really want is a home and children
• Being a housewife is just as fulfilling as working for pay
1=strongly agree; 4=strongly disagree
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
• When jobs are scarce, men have more right to a job than women
1=agree; 3=disagree.
Laicism
How much do you agree or disagree with the following:
• It would be better for [COUNTRY] if more people with strong religious beliefs held public office
• Politicians who do not believe in God are unfit for public office
1=agree strongly; 4=disagree strongly
(Post)materialism
Here is a list of things which some people think make for a successful marriage. Please tell me, for each one, whether you think it is very important, rather important or not very important for a successful marriage …
• An adequate income
• Good housing
1=very; 3=not.
ISO 3166 codes (countries)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleiner, TM. National image and trustworthiness – The role of cultural values in the creation of trust between European nations. Place Brand Public Dipl 8, 223–234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2012.15
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2012.15