Article
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society (2008) 13, 240–260. doi:10.1057/pcs.2008.7
Nineteen-Sixties Radicalism and its Critics: Radical Utopians, Liberal Realists and Postmodern Sceptics
Mike O'Donnella
aDepartment of Social and Political Studies, School of Social Science, Humanities and Languages, Westminster University, London
Correspondence: Professor Mike O'Donnell, Sociology, 309 Regent Street, W1B 2UW UK. E-mail: odonnem@wmin.ac.uk
Abstract
This article analyses the psychodynamics underlying 1960s radicalism – termed the Movement – in the United States and, more briefly, Britain. The Movement was heuristic and characterized by "utopian" and "humanistic" tendencies. The main sections deal respectively with the counterculture and the New Left. Criticisms of the Movement by liberals contemporary with the radicals and those of more recent commentators are addressed. Analysis of the radical/liberal debate examines two related themes: conflicting psychoanalytic interpretations of the Movement and "the end of ideology" debate. The main ideological formations dealt with are characterized as radical utopianism, liberal realism and postmodern scepticism.
Keywords:
radicalism, utopian, liberal realism, humanism, participatory democracy
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Nineteen-Sixties Radicalism and its Critics: Radical Utopians, Liberal Realists and Postmodern ScepticsPsychoanalysis, Culture & Society Article
Narcissism, Personal Life and Identity: The Place of the 1960s in the History of PsychoanalysisPsychoanalysis, Culture & Society Article



