Original Article
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society (2009) 14, 149–163. doi:10.1057/pcs.2008.40
Psychoanalysis and ideology: Comment on R.D. Hinshelwood
Yannis Stavrakakisa
aSchool of Political Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 46 Egnatia, Thessaloniki 54625, Greece
Correspondence: Yannis Stavrakakis, E-mail: yanstavr@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
Using as a starting point R.D. Hinshelwood's argumentation in 'Ideology and Identity,' this commentary aims at exploring what exactly psychoanalytic theory can offer today to the contemporary analysis of ideology. Through a systematic reconstruction and critique of the main hierarchical oppositions operating in Hinshelwood's approach – individual vs group life, constructive vs destructive group, truth/reality vs falsity – we point towards an alternative psychoanalytic orientation located beyond individualism, representationalism, objectivism, and (instrumental) rationalism. This orientation is articulated on the basis of Lacan's work on the symbolic, fantasy, and enjoyment.
Keywords:
Freud, ideology, instrumental reason, Lacan, reality
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Psychoanalysis and ideology: Comment on R.D. HinshelwoodPsychoanalysis, Culture & Society Original Article
?Two Brotherless Peoples?: On the Constitutive Traumas of Class StrugglePsychoanalysis, Culture & Society Article
Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political TheorySubjectivity Original Article
Subjectivity, identity and 300 SpartansPsychoanalysis, Culture & Society Original Article
Ideology and identity: A psychoanalytic investigation of a social phenomenonPsychoanalysis, Culture & Society Original Article
See all 64 matches for Research


