Skip to main content
Log in

Obsession & politics: A contribution to Lacanian political psychoanalysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obsessional politics gives name to what remains unsaid and under-examined within the contemporary political situation. If obsessional politics may be taken to refer to those tendencies within the political field whose symptomatic condition concerns a demand for novelty, and an avoidance of the goal of authentic novelty via the aim of repetition, it may be further assumed that obsessional politics operates according to the trinity of the obsessional neurotic: self-mastery, repetition, and novelty. Taken together, these three rings form the knot of obsessional politics. This article sets out to demonstrate that it is possible to form a post-obsessional knot by way of Jacques Lacan’s concept of “style,” Slavoj Žižek’s “act,” and Alain Badiou’s “event.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser, L. (1970, 2001) Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Translated by B. Brewster New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 85–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2013a) Seminar three. In: D. Rousselle (ed.) The Subject of Change. New York: Atropos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2013b) The event as creative novelty [video lecture], http://dingpolitik.wordpress.com/, accessed 12 March 2014.

  • Badiou, A. and Žižek, S. (2010) Is Lacan an anti-philosopher? [video and hyper-transcription], http://dingpolitik.wordpress.com/, accessed 12 April 2014.

  • Bosteels, B. (2005) Badiou without Žižek. Polygraph 17, http://simongros.com/text/articles/bruno-bosteels/badiou-without-zizek/, accessed 12 April 2014.

  • Bosteels, B. (forthcoming) Enjoy your truth: Lacan as vanishing mediator between Badiou and Žižek. In: A. Hamza (ed.) Repeating Žižek. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Day, R.J.F. (2005) Gramsci is Dead: Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2012a) Still dancing: Drive as a category of political economy. International Journal of Žižek Studies 6(1), http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/ijzs/article/view/374/432, accessed 11 February 2014.

  • Dean, J. (2012b) The communist horizon: Q & A [video], Trent University, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWidqd1eACY, accessed 11 February 2014.

  • Debord, G. (1958) Theory of the dérive. Internationale Situationiste 2(2): 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1967, n.d.) The society of the spectacle, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/debord/society.htm, accessed 12 March 2014.

  • Dunker, C.I.L. (2006) Style is the man himself. The Letter: Lacanian Perspectives on Psychoanalysis 37(Summer): 120–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. (1995) The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. (1999) A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. (2010) Against understanding: Why understanding should not be viewed as an essential aim of psychoanalytic treatment. The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 58(2): 259–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. (2013) Against Understanding: Commentary and Critique in a Lacanian Key. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1907, 1959) Obsessive actions and religious practices. Standard Edition, 9. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 115-128.

  • Freud, S. (1920, 1955) Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard Edition, 18. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 1-64.

  • Gambone, L. (1996) Proudhon and anarchism: Proudhon’s libertarian thought and the anarchist movement, http://www.spunk.org/texts/writers/proudhon/sp001863.html, accessed 3 April 2014.

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1846, 1962) The Present Age, and of the Difference Between a Genius and an Apostle. Translated by Alexander Dru New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1953, 1991) Freud’s Papers on Technique: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I. Translated by J. Forrester. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1953, 2006) The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In: J.-A. Miller (ed.) Écrits. Translated by B. Fink New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 197–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1954, 1988) The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II. Translated by S. Tomaselli. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1955, 1997b) The Psychoses: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III. Translated by R. Grigg. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1958, 2006) The direction of the treatment and the principles of its power. In: J.-A. Miller (ed.) Écrits. Translated by B. Fink New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 489–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1959, 1997a) The Ethics of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII. Translated by D. Porter. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1960, 2006) The subversion of the subject and the dialectic of desire in the Freudian unconscious. In: J.-A. Miller (ed.) Écrits. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 671–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1964, 1998) The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2013) On the Names-of-the-Father. Translated by B. Fink. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (1997) The Political Philosophy of Poststructuralist Anarchism. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, T. (2010) Subject of the event, subject of the act: The difference between Badiou's and Žižek's systems of philosophy. Subjectivity 3(April): 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. (2001) From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagia, D. (2013) Jacques Rancière’s style. Unpublished paper, http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/job-talks/pt-jb-papers/Jaques-Ranciere-Style-Davide-Panagia.pdf/view, accessed 16 March 2014.

  • Rancière, J. (2009) The Emancipated Spectator. New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousselle, D. (2014) The new hysterical question. Umbr(a): A Journal of the Unconscious 2013: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949, 1997) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Translated and edited by E.A. Shils and H. A. Finch. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1989) Hegemony. In: S. Lukes (ed.) Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2005) The Christian-Hegelian comedy. Cabinet Magazine 17, http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/17/zizek.php, accessed 16 March 2014.

  • Žižek, S. (2006) The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2008) For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2009) In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2010) Living in the End Times. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2012) The interpassive subject: Lacan turns a prayer wheel. In: How to Read Lacan. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S., Aristodemou, M., Frosh, S. and Hook, D. (2010) Unbehagen and the subject: An interview with Slavoj Žižek. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 15: 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupančič, A. (2011) Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duane Rousselle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rousselle, D. Obsession & politics: A contribution to Lacanian political psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Cult Soc 21, 348–367 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2015.62

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2015.62

Keywords

Navigation