Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical turks, mammet tricks and messianic time

  • Short Essay
  • Published:
postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay considers the uncannily persistent figure of the Mechanical Turk, a spectre that haunts medieval theology, early modern theatre and modern philosophy alike. In all three cases, it functions as the mechanical, inhuman antitype of a futurity figured as meaningful and human. These attributes are materialized also in the Renaissance ‘mammet’ or mechanical puppet, an object whose name bears the trace of a supposedly lifeless and regressive Islam. Turning to Romeo and Juliet, the essay concludes with a consideration of how Shakespeare's play deploys the mammet to counter-intuitive, untimely ends: by figuring Juliet as a mammet whose mechanical compulsions enable a messianic refusal of the old patronymic law, Romeo and Juliet explodes the temporal as much as ontological distinctions between human and machine, Christian and non-Christian, pre and post.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Biddick's ‘When Typologies Meet: Undeadening Messianic Time’ (2008) is a development of ideas first broached in her important book, The Typological Imagination: Circumcision, History, Technology (2003).

  2. All citations of Romeo and Juliet are from The Norton Shakespeare (2007), by act, scene and line numbers.

References

  • Ariosto, L . 1607. Orlando Furioso in English Historical Verse, by Sir John Harington. London: Richard Field.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becon, T . 1550. The Flower of Godly Praiers Most Worthy to be Vsed in These Our Daies for the Saueguard, Health, and Comforte of all Degrees, and Estates. London: John Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W . 1969. Theses on the Philosophy of History. In Illuminations, trans. H. Zohn, ed. H. Arendt. New York: Shocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddick, K . 2008. When Typologies Meet: Undeadening Messianic Time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Modern Languages Association; 28 December, San Francisco, California.

  • Daborne, R . 1612. Thesis on the Philosophy of History. A Christian Turned Turk. London: Nicholas Okes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, T . 2008. The Shoemaker's Holiday, ed. J.G. Harris. London: New Mermaids.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J . 1992. Afhorism Countertime. Acts of Literature, ed. D. Attridge. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foakes, R.A, ed. 2002. Henslowe's Diary, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R . 1861. Alphonsus. In The Dramatic and Poetical Works of Robert Greene and George Peele, ed. A. Dyce. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, W . 1616. An Englishman for My Money. London: W. White.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S . 1616. Nine Sermons Vpon Sundrie Texts of Scripture. London: Nicholas Okes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E . 1658. The New World of English Words, Or, A General Dictionary Containing the Interpretations of Such Hard Words As are Derived from Other Languages. London: E. Tyler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W . 1997. Romeo and Juliet. In The Norton Shakespeare, eds. S. Greenblatt, W. Cohen, J.E. Howard and K.E. Maus. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbes, P . 1583. The Anatomie of Abuses. London: John Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, J. Mechanical turks, mammet tricks and messianic time. Postmedieval 1, 80–87 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2010.10

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2010.10

Navigation