Abstract
This essay compares medieval and modern narratives of abnormal sensory perception with a focus on ‘phantom’ tactility. After considering the ways in which tactile perception is represented and managed in recent neuroscientific literature, particularly in Ramachandran and Blakeslee's popular work, Phantoms in the Brain, it turns to an account of extraordinary tactility in the Life of the twelfth-century English anchorite, Christina of Markyate. It argues that the medieval text can point to some of the sensory biases and disabling practices of current medical discourses about abnormal perception.
Notes
See, for example, the ‘Patient Voices’ section of the New York Times website (2010). The written works of Temple Grandin evidence the wide popularity currently achievable for memoirs written from the perspective of a minoritarian medical identity (see, for example, Grandin, 2010).
For a discussion of the nineteenth-century emergence of ‘medical semiotics’ alongside Arthur Conan Doyle's creation of Sherlock Holmes, see Ginzberg, 1989, 96–125.
Caroline Walker Bynum's reflections on the cultural specificity of anorexia nervosa (Bynum, 1992, 141–143) were very influential in this regard.
See also Hacking (2002).
‘There is no other sense than the five already listed – seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching’ (Aristotle, 1957, 107).
See, for example, Avicenna (1952, 27).
CRPS involves mysterious pain and motor disability after relatively minor trauma (Bultitude and Rafal, 2010, 409). While mirror therapy has caught the attention of researchers, it is not the only (or even preferred) treatment for these conditions.
For St. Cecilia's vita, see Aelfric (1900, 357–377); for lives of Catherine and Margaret written for early thirteenth-century religious women readers, see Seinte Katerine (d’Ardenne and Dobson, eds., 1981) and Seinte Marherete (Mack, ed., 1934).
The relationship between Christina and Geoffrey has been much discussed, and not all readers see it in an entirely positive light. Dyan Elliott, for example, argues that it subordinates women's spiritual careers to men's well-being (Elliott, 2005, 177).
References
Aelfric . 1900. Aelfric's Lives of Saints, ed. W.W. Skeat. Vol. 4. EETS o.s. 114. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
Aristotle . 1957. On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath, trans. W.S. Hett. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā). 1952. Avicenna's Psychology: An English Translation of Kitāb al-Najāt, ed. and trans. F. Rahman. London: Oxford University Press.
Bultitude, J. and R. Rafal . 2010. Derangement of Body Representation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Report of a Case Treated with Mirror and Prisms. Experimental Brain Research 204 (3): 409–418.
Bynum, C.W. 1992. Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion. New York: Zone Books.
d'Ardenne, S. and E. Dobson ., eds. 1981. Seinte Katerine. EETS s.s. 7. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dumit, J. 2003. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Elliott, D. 2005. Alternative Intimacies: Men, Women, and Spiritual Direction in the Twelfth Century. In Christina of Markyate: A Twelfth Century Holy Woman, eds. S. Fanous and H. Leyser, 160–183. New York: Routledge.
Ginzberg, C. 1989. Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, trans. J. Tedeschi and A. Tedeschi. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Grandin, T. 2010. Temple Grandin, PhD [Temple Grandin's official website], http://www.templegrandin.com/templehome.html.
Hacking, I. 2002. Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heller-Roazen, D. 2007. The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. New York: Zone Books.
Mack, F., ed. 1934. Seinte Marherete, EETS o.s. 193. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Moseley, G. and K. Wiech . 2009. The Effect of Tactile Discrimination Training is Enhanced When Patients Watch the Reflected Image of Their Unaffected Limb During Training. Pain 144 (3): 314–319.
The New York Times Online. 2009. Patient Voices [audio feature], http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/09/10/health/Patient_Voices.html.
Price, J. and M. Shildrick . 2004. Touch, Ethics, and Disability. In Disability/Postmodernity, eds. M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, 62–87. London: Continuum.
Ramachandran, V. and S. Blakeslee . 1998. Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York: HarperPerennial.
Ramachandran, V. and D. Rogers-Ramachandran . 2009. Two Eyes, Two Views. Scientific American Mind 20 (5): 22–24.
Ramachandran, V. and D. Rogers-Ramachandran . 2010. Aristotle's Error. Scientific American Mind 21 (1): 20–22.
Russell, M. 2008. Treating Traumatic Amputation-related Phantom Limb Pain: A Case Study Utilizing Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing within the Armed Services. Clinical Case Studies 7 (2): 136–153.
Sacks, O. 2008. Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain. New York: Vintage.
Salmón, F. 2005. A Medieval Territory for Touch. Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History 3 (2): 59–81.
Sanders, L. 2010. Diagnosis [a collection of Diagnosis columns]. The New York Times Online, http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/news/health/columns/diagnosis/.
Talbot, C.H., ed. and trans. 1959. The Life of Christina of Markyate, A Twelfth Century Recluse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Watters, E. 2010. Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche. New York: Free Press.
Woolgar, C. 2006. The Senses in Late Medieval England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farina, L. Once more with feeling: Tactility and cognitive alterity, medieval and modern. Postmedieval 3, 290–301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2012.16
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2012.16