Risk Management - Table 3 for article: Antagonism, Trust and Perceived Risk

FROM:

Antagonism, Trust and Perceived Risk

Lennart Sjöberg

Organization/actor	Correlation trust – efficiency for respondents who perceived low antagonism	Correlation trust – efficiency for respondents who perceived high antagonism	Significance of difference between the correlations in columns 2 and 3 ^a
1. Banks	0.270^*	0.015	0.11
2. Advertising agencies	0.312	-0.139	0.0035
3. Auto repair shops	0.437^**	0.142	0.0002
4. Morning newspapers	0.271^**	-0.213	0.002
5. Tabloids	0.034	-0.089	0.2362
6. State television	0.139	0.317^*	—
7. Police	0.357^**	-0.073	0.0046
8. The courts	0.287^**	0.456^*	—
9. Medical care	0.332^**	-0.002	0.0215
10. Universities	0.425^**	0.437^*	—
11. National organization of labor unions (LO)	0.492^**	0.215	0.0806
12. Grade school	0.512^**	0.323	0.0895
13. Local politicians	0.264	0.054	0.1036
14. Used cars salespeople	-0.320	0.014	—
15. SAS	0.327^**	0.307^*	0.4484
16. Drug companies	0.315^*	-0.163	0.0021
17. Stock brokers	0.245	-0.017	0.0597
18. Capital owners	0.545^**	-0.142	<0.00005
19. Insurance companies	0.113	-0.063	0.1516
20. The national government	0.196	-0.005	0.1176
21. Coop	0.253^*	0.029	0.0903
22. National association of local authorities	0.200	-0.023	0.1473
23. Defense authorities	0.262^*	0.198	0.3467

^a P-values are given only in 20 cases where the difference is in the hypothesized direction.

^* P<0.05.

^** P<0.01.