Risk Management

TABLE 1

FROM:

Genetically Modified Food in The Eyes of the Public and Experts

Lennart Sjöberg

BACK TO ARTICLE

Table 1. Ratings of the 19 psychometric factors, means and standard deviations, and t-tests of differences between experts and the public

Figure and tables index
  Public Experts Standardized difference a , and outcome of t-test
  Mean Std. deviation Mean Std. deviation  
New and unknown5.151.514.051.790.70***
Order of nature is disturbed5.351.502.491.241.69***
Hard to understand5.231.374.581.650.45**
Little known even to scientists4.811.543.091.511.06***
Involuntary exposure5.191.554.131.420.67***
Hard to avoid5.181.463.641.531.01***
Immediate negative consequences3.971.521.891.141.30***
Negative effects hard to reverse4.621.542.471.171.32***
Strongly feared, dreaded4.601.533.651.600.61***
"Unnatural" activity5.221.622.601.571.47***
Will hurt children and future generations4.611.682.021.081.44***
Unfair and immoral4.771.752.311.301.33***
Creates great worry5.181.254.331.170.67***
Human arrogance and hubris4.901.672.071.191.56***
Disaster due to interference with nature4.981.652.201.171.55***
Increasing effects over time5.121.512.671.351.49***
Will lead to cancer3.941.571.930.941.23***
An activity counter to nature5.161.702.131.391.61***
Can have negative effects unknown today5.711.373.291.421.57***

  *** P<0.0005, ** P<0.01.

a Standardized to give all the variables a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. This is done in order to make it possible to easily get a measure of the size of the differences, which is comparable across scales and studies. A difference about 0.6 on a standardized scale is considered "very large" (Cohen, 1988). Note that the present differences between the public and experts in most cases are much larger than that.

Figure and tables index
BACK TO ARTICLE