Abstract
A clear appreciation of the consequences resulting from an asteroid impact is required in order to understand the near-Earth object (NEO) hazard. Three main processes require modelling to analyse the entire impact event. These are the atmospheric entry phase, land impact events and ocean impact events. A range of impact generated effects (IGEs) are produced by different impact scenarios. It is these IGEs that present the threat to human populations worldwide, and the infrastructure they utilise. A software system for analysing the NEO threat has been developed, entitled NEOimpactor, to examine the social and economic consequences from land and ocean impacts. Existing mathematical models for the three principal impact processes have been integrated into one complete system, which has the capability to model the various effects of a terrestrial asteroid impact and, critically, predict the consequences for the global population and infrastructure. Analysis of multiple impact simulations provides a robust method for the provision of an integrated, global vulnerability assessment of the NEO hazard. The primary graphical outputs from NEOimpactor are in the form of ‘relative consequence’ maps, and these have been designed to be comprehensible to a non-specialist audience. By the use of a series of multiple-impact simulations, the system has identified the five countries most at risk from the impact hazard, as well as indicating the various factors influencing vulnerability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boslough, M.B.E. and Crawford, D.A. (2008) Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat. International Journal of Impact Engineering 35 (12): 1441–1448.
Chyba, C.F. (1993) Explosions of small Spacewatch objects in the Earth's atmosphere. Nature 363 (6431): 701–703.
Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J. and Marcus, R.A. (2005) Earth impact effects program: A web-based computer program for calculating the regional environmental consequen-ces of a meteoroid impact on Earth. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 40 (6): 817–840.
Galvez, A., Coradini, M. and Ongaro, F. (2003) The role of space missions in the assessment of the NEO impact hazard. Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress, Session C.2.3; 29 September–3 October, Bremen, Germany.
Gertsch, L., Baird, J. and Worsey, P. (2007) Blast designs for NEO destruction. Proceedings of the Planetary Defence Conference; 5–8 March 2007, Washington DC, http://www.aero.org/conferences/planetarydefense/2007papers/P2-2--Gertsch-Paper.pdf, accessed 30 October 2008.
Harvey, B. (2004) China's Space Program: From Conception to Manned Spaceight. New York: Springer.
ISRO. (2008) Welcome to Indian space research organisation. Department of Space, Indian Space Research Organisation, http://www.isro.org/, accessed 1 December 2008.
JAXA. (2006) Hayabusa mission. Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/enterp/missions/hayabusa/index.shtml, accessed 19 July 2006.
Maurrasse, F.J.M.R. and Sen, G. (1991) Impacts, tsunamis, and the Haitian cretaceous-tertiary boundary layer. Science 252 (5013): 1690.
NASA. (2008) Visible Earth: A catalog of NASA images and animations of our home planet. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/, accessed 30 November 2008.
OECD. (2009) Organisation for economic co-operation and development, http://www.oecd.org/home/, accessed 17 January 2009.
Patenaud, S. (2007) Nuclear deection. Proceedings of the Planetary Defence Conference; 5–8 March 2007, Washington DC, http://www.aero.org/conferences/planetarydefense/2007papers/S2-2--Patenaud-Brief.pdf, accessed 30 October 2008.
Paxson, C. and Rouse, C.E. (2008) Returning to new Orleans after hurricane Katrina. American Economic Review 98: 38–42.
Pravec, P. and Harris, A.W. (2000) Fast and slow rotation of asteroids. Icarus 148 (1): 12–20.
Rantucci, G. (1995) Geological Disasters in the Philippines: The July 1990 Earthquake and the June 1991 Eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Rome, Italy: Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Robinson, L. and Jarvie, J.K. (2008) Post-disaster community tourism recovery: The tsunami and Arugam Bay, Sri Lanka. Disasters 32 (4): 631–645.
Savage, S.J. and Waldman, D. (2005) Broadband internet access, awareness, and use: Analysis of United States household data. Telecommunications Policy 29: 615–633.
Seed, H.B., Romo, M.P., Sun, J.I., Jaime, A. and Lysmer, J. (1988) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985: Relationships between soil conditions and earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 4 (4): 687–729.
Smit, J. (1999) Global stratigraphy of the cretaceous-tertiary boundary impact ejecta. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 27: 75–113.
Stokes, G.H. and Yeomans, D.K. (2003) A study to determine the feasibility of extending the search for NEOs to smaller limiting diameters. Technical Report of a NASA science definition team, http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/neoreport030825.pdf, accessed November 2008.
Titov, V., Rabinovich, A.B., Mofjeld, H.O., Thomson, R.E. and Gonzalez, F.I. (2005) Ocean science: The global reach of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra tsunami. Science 309 (5743): 2045–2048.
Ward, S.N. (2000) Tsunamis. In: R.A. Meyers (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Physical Science and Technology, Vol. 17. New York: Academic Press, p. 16.
Ward, S.N. and Asphaug, E. (2002) Impact tsunami – Eltanin. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 49 (6): 1073–1079.
Ward, S.N. and Asphaug, E. (2003) Asteroid impact tsunami of 2880 March 16th. Geophysical Journal International 153 (3): 6–10.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship of the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) and the School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, UK. Without this support, the research presented in this article would not have been possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, N., Swinerd, G., Lewis, H. et al. Global vulnerability to near-Earth object impact. Risk Manag 12, 31–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2009.16
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2009.16