Skip to main content
Log in

Using revealed- and stated-preference customer choice models for making pricing decisions in services: An illustration from the hospitality industry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

This article presents an overview of discrete choice modeling for making pricing decisions in services. During recent years, discrete choice modeling has emerged as an effective approach for developing analytical models and for estimating relative weights of parameters based on empirical data. For estimation purposes, typically one of two forms of data is used: transactional data captured in databases (revealed-preference data); or primary experimental data (stated-preference data). In this article, we provide detailed illustration of both approaches for pricing decisions for hospitality services. Finally, we discuss the managerial implications of the discrete choice modeling approach described earlier in the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C.K. and Xie, X. (2009) A Choice Based Dynamic Programming Approach for Setting Opaque Prices. Cornell University. Working Paper.

  • Anderson, N.H. (1981) Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N.H. (1982) Methods of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R. (1991) Discrete Choice Analysis. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, F. and Pullman, M.E. (2001) Optimizing service attributes: The seller's utility problem. Decision Sciences 32 (2): 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrow, L.A., Jones, S.P. and Parker, R.A. (2007) How much airline customers are willing to pay: An analysis of price sensitivity in online distribution channels. Journal of Revenue and pricing Management 5 (4): 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gensch, D.H. and Recker, W.W. (1979) The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model. Journal of Marketing Research 16 : 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and Krieger, A.M. (1996) Individualized hybrid models for conjoint analysis. Management Science 42 : 850–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and Srinivasan, V. (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing 54 : 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni, P.M. and Little, J.D.C. (1983) A logit model of brand choice based on scanner data. Marketing Science 2 : 203–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. and Johnson, L. (1980) Applied Discrete-Choice Modelling. London: Croom-Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal, Z., Verma, R. and Baran, R. (2003) Understanding consumer choices and preferences in transaction-based e-services. Journal of Service Research 6 (1): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J. (1988) Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. and Timmermans, H. (1990) Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research: A review. Leisure Sciences 12 (1): 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1986) The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Science 5 (4): 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M., Verma, R. and Goodale, J. (2000) Service design and operations strategy formulation in multicultural markets. Journal of Operations Management 19 (2): 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2004) The Paradox of Choices: Why More is Less. HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1987) What is an application and when is theory a waste of time? Management Science 33 (12): 1511–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swait, J. and Louviere, J.J. (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research 30 : 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, K.T. and van Ryzin, G.J. (2004a) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, K. and van Ryzin, G. (2004b) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Science 50 (1): 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R., Iqbal, Z. and Plaschka, G. (2004) Understanding customer choices in E-financial services. California Management Review 46 (4): 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R., Plaschka, G., Hanlon, B., Livingston, A. and Kalcher, K. (2008) Predicting customer choices in services using discrete choice analysis. IBM Systems Journal 47 (1): 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R., Thompson, G.M. and Louviere, J.J. (1999) Configuring service operations in accordance with customers needs and preferences. Journal of Service Research 1 (3): 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R., Thompson, G.M., Moore, W.L. and Louviere, J.J. (2001) Effective design of products/services: An approach based on integration of marketing and operations management decisions. Decision Sciences 32 (1): 165–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorino, L. and Verma, R. (2007) Scripting the Service Encounter: An Empirical Analysis. Working Paper.

  • Vulcano, G., van Ryzin, G.J. and Chaar, W. (forthcoming) Choice-based revenue management: An empirical study of estimation and optimization. MSOM, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo MacDonald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDonald, L., Anderson, C. & Verma, R. Using revealed- and stated-preference customer choice models for making pricing decisions in services: An illustration from the hospitality industry. J Revenue Pricing Manag 11, 160–174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2010.21

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2010.21

Keywords

Navigation