Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation-based key performance indicators for evaluating the quality of airline demand forecasting

  • AGIFORS Conference Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

This article describes an approach to evaluating the quality of airline demand forecasting. It presents a a simulation framework that includes a detailed model for generating artificial demand. In this system forecasting methods can be compared in a stable, controllable environment. Their performance may be rated based on the overall system output in terms of revenue and bookings as well as through common error measurements. In addition, the use of a psychic forecast as a benchmark is proposed and illustrated by first results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelghany, A. and Abdelghany, K. (2007) Evaluating airlines ticket distribution strategies: A simulation-based approach. International Journal of Revenue Management 1 (3): 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algers, S. and Beser, M. (2001) Modelling choice of flight and booking class-a study using stated preference and revealed preference data. International Journal of Services Technology and Management 2 (1): 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. (2001) Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W., Homem-de-Mello, T. and Kleywegt, A. (2006) Models of the spiral-down effect in revenue management. Operations Research 54 (5): 968–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M., Friedemann, M. and Schröder, A. (2008) Principles for simulations in revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 7 (1): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopperstad, C. (2007) Market-based forecasting investigation I. PODS Consortium Meeting, Mainz, Germany, Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, K. (1972) Forecasting and control of passenger bookings. AGIFORS Symposium Proceedings 12: 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, J. and van Ryzin, G. (1999) Revenue management: Research overview and prospects. Transportation Science 33 (2): 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nason, S. (2007) Forecasting the future of airline revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 6 (1): 64–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pölt, S. (1998) Forecasting is diffcult – especially if it refers to the future. In AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group Annual Meeting Proceedings. (Melbourne, Australia).

  • Talluri, K. and van Ryzin, G. (2004) Theory and Practice of Revenue Management. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1966) Applied Economic Forecasting. Amsterdam: North-Holl and Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, L. and Belobaba, P. (2002) Revenue impacts of fare input and demand forecast accuracy in airline yield management. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (8): 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, L. and Bodily, S. (1992) A taxonomy and research overview of perishableasset revenue management: Yield management, overbooking, and pricing. Operations Research 40 (5): 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeni, R. (2001) Improved Forecast Accuracy in Revenue Management by Unconstraining Demand Estimates from Censored Data. Newark, NJ: State University of New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

1having graduated from the University of Paderborn, Germany, with a degree in Business Computing, Catherine Cleophas now is a student of the International Graduate School of Dynamic Intelligent Systems, Paderborn. Her doctoral work is sponsored by a Lufthansa fellowship and focuses on a concept of evaluating demand forecasts for airline revenue management.

3functions as Junior Professor since 2005 at the Decision Support & Operations Research Lab at the University of Paderborn, Germany. Her research focuses on planning for public transport with special regard to simulation and robust planning.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cleophas, C., Frank, M. & Kliewer, N. Simulation-based key performance indicators for evaluating the quality of airline demand forecasting. J Revenue Pricing Manag 8, 330–342 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2009.17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2009.17

Keywords

Navigation