Skip to main content
Log in

A quasi-experimental investigation of self-reported offending and perception of criminal opportunity in undergraduate students

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation has been designed to test the hypothesis that individuals who admit to a greater variety of offending also perceive more criminal and nuisance/deviant uses for everyday objects. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with level of self-reported offending as the quasi-experimental variable, and percentage of criminal/delinquent uses given, as the dependent variable; 107 students took part in the study. Results supported the hypothesis: those who self-report a high offending rate also generate more criminal uses for everyday objects. Results are discussed within an applications framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opportunity, accessed 7 January 2009.

References

  • Arbib, M.A. (1997) From visual affordances in monkey parietal cortex to hippocampo-parietal interactions underlying rat navigation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci 352: 1429–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Jr, W. et al (2001) Motor vehicle crash involvement and moving violations: Convergence of self-report and archival data. Human Factors 43 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I., Blickle, T.W., Teitelbaum, R.C. and Klatsky, G.J. (1988) Object search in nonscene displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (3): 456–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I. (1997) A theoretical model of the behavioural addictions––applied to offending. In: J. Hodge, M. McMurran, C. Holln, (eds.) Addicted to Crime? Chicester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. (2006) The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind Is Designed to Kill. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V. and Eck, J. (2003) Become a Problem Solving Crime Analyst, in 55 Small Steps. London: Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costall, A. and Leudar, I. (1996) Situating action I: Truth in the situation. Ecological Psychology 8 (2): 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. (1953/1974) Other People's Money. Belmon: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2000) The conjunction of criminological opportunity – a tool for clear ‘joined-up’ thinking about community safety and crime reduction. In: S. Ballintyne, K. Pease, and V. McLaren, (eds.) Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. and Tilley, N. (2000) Going equipped. British Journal of Criminology 40: 376–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2005) A theory explaining biological correlates of criminality. European Journal of Criminology 2 (3): 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (2002) Crime and Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. and Clarke, RV. (1998) Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. London: Home Office. Police Research Series Paper 98.

  • Furnham, A. and Thompson, J. (1991) Personality and self-reported delinquency. Personality & Individual Differences 12 (6): 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J.W. and Jackson, P.W. (1962) Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Oxford, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. (2005) Learning from Fraudsters. Leicester: Protiviti Ltd., Perpetuity Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R. and Passingham, R.E. (2003) Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 17 (12): 2735–2740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L. (1966) Contrary Imaginations: A Psychological Study of the English Schoolboy. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1992) Culture and the perception of the environment. In: E. Croll & D. Parkin (eds.) Bush Base: Forest Farm. Culture, Environment and Development. London: Routledge, pp. 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1994) The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 17: 187–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., Farrington, D.P. and Jolliffe, D. (2008) Comparing arrests and convictions with reported offending. In: R. Loeber, D.P. Farrington, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, H.R. White, (eds.) Violence and Serious Theft: Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, P., Clarke, R.V.G., Sturman, A. and Hough, J.M. (1976) Crime as Opportunity. London: HMSO. Home Office Research Study No. 34. A Home Office Research Unit Report.

  • McGrenere, J. and Ho, W. (2000) Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000; May. Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure, enlarged edition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, C. (2004) Research on burglary at the end of the millennium: a grounded approach to understanding crime. Security Journal 16 (3): 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijpers, J.R., Oudejans, R.R.D., Bakker, F.C. and Beek, P.J. (2006) The role of anxiety in perceiving and realizing affordances. Ecological Psychology 18 (3): 131–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999) Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist 54: 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A.A., Turkkan, S.J., Bachrach, C.A., Jobe, J.B., Kurtzman, H.S. and Cain, V.S. (2000) The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1985) Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.O.H. (2009) Crime propensity, criminogenic exposure and crime involvement in early to mid adoselcence. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 92 (2–3): in press.

  • Wortley, R.K. (1997). Reconsidering the role of opportunity in situational crime prevention. In: G. Newman, R.V. Clarke, and S.G. Shoham, (eds.) Rational Choice and Situational Crime Prevention, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Gratitude is extended to Professor Ken Pease, Professor Martin Gill, and to two anonymous reviewers, for comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garwood, J. A quasi-experimental investigation of self-reported offending and perception of criminal opportunity in undergraduate students. Secur J 24, 37–51 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.8

Keywords

Navigation