Skip to main content
Log in

Risk analysis in loss prevention research

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional risk management models identify risks, assess the probability of their occurrence and potential impact, and then implement steps to reduce the risk or the impact of the risk. Although almost all retailers implement measures to try to eliminate or reduce theft (the end step of risk management), we know little about how many undertake systematic risk assessments of loss to guide solutions and the methods that they may use to do so. This study presents the results of a survey of 22 diverse retail companies about their LP/AP risk management process, including the types of risk data collected, types of risk assessment and analyses conducted, and how these data are used in management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumer, T.L. and Rosenbaum, D.P. (1984) Combating Retail Theft: Programs and Strategies. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth, pp. 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, J.F. (1984) Risk Analysis and the Security Survey. Boston, MA: Butterworth Publishers, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodt, S.J. (1994) Shoplifting and amateur shoplifters in the 90's: A case study. Journal of Security Administration 17 (2): 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, T.E. (2003) Corporate Security Management: Organization and Spending Since 9/11. New York: The Conference Board, Inc. Homeland Security, Research Report R-1333-03-RR.

  • Dickstein, D.I. and Flast, R.H. (2009) No Excuses: A Business Process Approach to Managing Operational Risk. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLonardo, R. (1996) Defining and measuring the economic benefit of electronic article surveillance. Security Journal 7 (1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K. and Ferrara, J. (1985) Shoplifting, the Antishoplifting Guidebook. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D.P. (2003) Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587: 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D.P. and Painter, K. (2003) How to evaluate the impact of CCTV on crime. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 5 (3): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiles, A. (2002) Enterprise Risk Assessment and Business Impact Analysis: Best Practices. Brookfield, CT: Rothstein Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R.C. and Adams, A. (2010) 2009 National Retail Security Survey. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R.C., Dabney, D. and Hayes, R. (1999) National Retail Security Survey. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T.L. and Scicchitano, M.J. (2006) Research by retailers: Understanding loss and the effectiveness of loss prevention strategies. Security Journal 19 (4): 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemke, L.W. (1992) The Sociology of Shoplifting: Boosters and Snitches Today. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J. (1995) Preventing retail-sector crimes. In: M. Toney and D.P. Farrington (eds.) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010) Crime in the United States, 2009. Details can be obtained from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/09cius.htm.

  • Welsh, B.C. and Farrington, D.P. (2001) Toward an evidence based approach to preventing crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578 (1): 158–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johns, T. Risk analysis in loss prevention research. Secur J 24, 225–236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2011.11

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2011.11

Keywords

Navigation