Skip to main content
Log in

Safety research on the move

  • Afterword
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Question: What makes connections (often deep ones) between diverse areas, has a network of equally diverse participants, and the potential to significantly impact the life of cities and their inhabitants? Answer: The researchers who combined to produce this special issue, of course. I was privileged to see them, and others, in action at a workshop convened in Stockholm by the Editor of this special issue, and to read the papers published here. I am no specialist in transport crime, but have a broad interest in research and practice in crime prevention and particular concern with the built environment and with design in general. The Editor has already capably summarised the content of the articles in the Introduction, which allows me, in what follows, to reflect on some of the many issues raised, both specific to transport and common to the whole of crime science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Science). (2006) Foresight project Intelligent Infrastructure Systems, www.bis.gov.uk/foresight/our-work/projects/published-projects/intelligent-infrastructure-systems, accessed 25 January 2014.

  • Cornish, D. (1994) The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. In: R. Clarke (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 3, pp. 151–196. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2002) Future imperfect: Preparing for the crimes to come. Criminal Justice Matters. 46 Winter 2001/02. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Kings College, pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2004) Reconciling evidence of what works, knowledge of crime reduction and community safety principles, and values. Annex 2. In: Safer Places: The Planning System and Crime Prevention. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2005) How to police the future: Scanning for scientific and technological innovations which generate potential threats and opportunities in crime, policing and crime reduction. In: M. Smith and N. Tilley (eds.) Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2010) The conjunction of criminal opportunity theory. Sage Encyclopaedia of Victimology and Crime Prevention. Vol. 1, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2011a) Deconstructing CPTED … and reconstructing it for practice, knowledge management and research, thematic issue of European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research on Updating Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design 17 (1): 7–28.

  • Ekblom, P. (2011b) Crime Prevention, Security and Community Safety Using the 5Is Framework. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2012) Citizen participation in crime prevention – Capturing practice knowledge through the 5Is framework. In: M. Coester and E. Marks (eds.) International Perspectives of Crime Prevention 4. Contributions from the 4th and the 5th Annual International Forum 2010 and 2011 within the German Congress on Crime Prevention. Mönchengladbach, Germany: Forum Verlag Godesberg GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. and Sidebottom, A. (2008) What do you mean, ‘Is it secure?’ Redesigning language to be fit for the task of assessing the security of domestic and personal electronic goods. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 14 (1): 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P.E. (1954) Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monchuk, L. and Clancey, G. (2013) A comparative analysis of crime risk assessments and their application in greater manchester and new South Wales. Built Environment 39 (1): 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, A. and Gamman, L. (2013) Walking with Park: Exploring the ‘reframing’ and integration of CPTED principles in neighbourhood regeneration in Seoul, South Korea. Crime Prevention and Community Safety Journal 3 (15): 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, M., Ekblom, P. and Hirschfield, A. (2012) Co-designing a toolkit for controlling hostile reconnaissance. Open innovation in a controlled environment. Presentation at International Crime Science Conference, London, June.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekblom, P. Safety research on the move. Secur J 27, 257–261 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.10

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.10

Keywords

Navigation