Abstract
Research has provided plenty of evidence on how crime is influenced by guardianship – people’s capacity to affect crime. The aim of this article is to examine whether opportunities for guardianship are in turn affected by the physical and social environments of underground stations. Stockholm, the capital of Sweden, is used as a case study. Guardianship here constitutes two dependent variables indicated by visibility and surveillance. The analysis combines data from fieldwork with secondary land use and socio-economic data as independent variables in a set of logistic regression models. After controlling for endogeneity, findings show that guardianship opportunities are affected by the flow of passengers, presence of security guards, good sightlines and tools for surveillance, for example, mirrors. Nonetheless, these impacts vary by different sections of the station. The article concludes by presenting how guardianship opportunities can be promoted as a means of reducing crime and disorder at transport nodes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Block, R. and Davis, S. (1996) The environs of rapid transit stations: A focus for street crime or just another risky place? In: D. Clarke (ed.) Preventing Mass Transit Crime. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 238–257.
Burns, R. and Burns, R. (2009) Business Research Methods and Statistics using SPSS. Chapter 24 Logistic Regression, http://www.uk.sagepub.com/burns/default.htm, accessed 26 September 2013.
Ceccato, V. (2013) Moving Safely: Crime and Perceived Safety in Stockholm's Subway Stations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Ceccato, V., Uittenbogaard, A. and Bamzar, R. (2013) Security in Stockholm’s underground stations: The importance of environmental attributes and context. Security Journal 26 (1): 33–59.
Clarke, R.V. (1995) Situational crime prevention. In: M. Tonry and D. Farrington (eds.) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–150.
Cohen, L.E. and Felson, M. (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–605.
Cozens, P., Neale, R., Whitaker, J. and Hillier, D. (2003) Managing crime and the fear of crime at railway stations – A case study in South Wales (UK). International Journal of Transport Management 1 (3): 121–132.
Eck, J. (1994) Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Felson, M. and Cohen, L.E. (1980) Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology 8 (4): 389–405.
Hollis-Peel, M., Reynald, D., Bavel, M., Elffers, H. and Welsh, B. (2011) Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change 56 (1): 53–70.
Hope, T. (1999) Privatopia on trial? Property guardianship in the suburbs. In: K. Painter and N. Tilley (eds.) Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lightning and Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 10. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice press.
Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (1999) Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4): 395–411.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Liggett, R. and Iseki, H. (2002) The geography of transit crime: Documentation and evaluation of crime incidence on and around the Green Line Stations in Los Angeles. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (2): 135–151.
Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Norman, G. (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education 15 (5): 625–632.
Painter, K. and Tilley, N. (1999) Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 10. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Pennell, S., Curtis, C. and Henderson, J. (1985) Guardian Angels: An Assessment of Citizen Response to Crime. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice, US Association of Governments.
Reynald, M. (2011a) Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Asseissing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic context in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 48 (1): 110–142.
Reynald, M. (2011b) Guarding Against Crime: Measuring Guardianship within Routine Activity Theory. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Reynald, M. and Elffers, H. (2009) The future of Newman’s defensible space theory: Linking defensible space and the routine activities of place. European Journal of Criminology 6 (1): 1477–3708.
Shaw, C.R. and McKay, H.D. (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, M. and Clarke, R. (2000) Crime and public transport. Crime and Justice 27 (1): 169–233.
Stockholm Public Transport – SL. (2012) Fakta om SL och länet, 2011. AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik, http://sl.se/sv/Om-SL/Det-har-ar-SL/Rapporter/Fakta-om-SL-och-lanet/, accessed 2 October 2013.
Stockholm Stad. (2013) Statistik, fakta och kartor, http://www.stockholm.se/OmStockholm/Fakta-och-kartor/, accessed 26 September 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uittenbogaard, A. Assessing guardianship opportunities at underground stations. Secur J 27, 147–163 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.3