Skip to main content
Log in

Do Web surveys facilitate reporting less favourable opinions about law enforcement?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates possible sources of error in a public opinion survey conducted by a metropolitan police service. Logistic regression models are used to analyse the results of a mixed-mode survey in which respondents were questioned over the telephone or through a Web survey. Even after controlling for demographics, respondent lifestyle and criminal victimization, Web respondents were significantly more likely to (i) give lower scores on questions about satisfaction with the police and level of perceived police legitimacy, (ii) indicate unfavourable opinions about the police, (iii) confess worries or fear about their own security and (iv) select moderate response choices. Telephone surveys seem to overestimate favourable opinions about the police and underestimate public concerns about security. It is important to understand these effects because survey results are often used to support strategic decisions about public safety or to assess police performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While sampling bias or the failure to target a representative portion of the population is now well-recognized (for example, Berk, 1983) and thus not discussed here, nonresponse error is a methodological threat even if the base sample is correctly selected. A study that managed to contact a representative sample of respondents would still yield representative results only if all respondents completed the survey and gave truthful answers.

  2. Households with mobile phones only are therefore excluded from the first sampling frame, which could result in coverage error (Busse and Fuchs, 2012). Subsequent analyses take this issue into account by controlling for demographics.

  3. The computation of comparable response rates for different modes of collection is difficult (Shih and Fan, 2008). For telephone, most firms use a simple computation (number of respondents/number of answered calls). For Web surveys, although firms are generally not able to determine the number of people who actually received an invitation, Web response rates are often calculated by dividing the number of respondents by the number of invitations sent.

  4. Multivariate analyses were also conducted. Telephone respondents refused to respond to a larger number of questions (Poisson regression; P<0.01), and a greater number of telephone respondents refused to answer at least one of the seven questions (binary logistic regression; P<0.01) controlling for demographics.

  5. An anonymous reviewer highlighted the fact that the temporal priority of the two variables is not defined: it is almost certain that individuals go out at night because they believe it is safe to do so. There is a statistically significant relationship between both variables (r=0.313; P<0.01). However, in this analysis, the frequency of nights out is used as a control variable measuring exposure to risk. Individuals who go out at night expose themselves to higher risks of victimization, which could influence their perception of safety.

References

  • Baumgartner, H. and Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (2001) Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R.A. (1983) An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review 48(3): 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, S.G., Frank, J., Worden, R.E. and Bynum, T.S. (1994) Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship. Justice Quarterly 11(1): 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. and Benedict, W.R. (2002) Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 25(3): 543–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunton-Smith, I. and Sturgis, P. (2011) Do neighborhoods generate fear of crime? An empirical test using the British crime survey. Criminology 49(2): 331–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, B. and Fuchs, M. (2012) The components of landline telephone survey coverage bias: The relative importance of no-phone and mobile-only populations. Quality and Quantity 46(4): 1209–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. and Krosnick, J.A. (2009) National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly 73(4): 641–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. and Krosnick, J.A. (2010) Comparing oral interviewing with self-administered computerized questionnaires: An experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1): 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P.M. (2006) In search of purpose and priorities: Police performance indicators in England and Wales. Public Money and Management 26(3): 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J. and Dillman, D. (eds.) (2008) Mixed-mode surveys: When and why. In: International Handbook of Survey Methodology. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis Group), pp. 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. and Messer, B.L. (2010) Mixed-mode surveys. In: P.V. Marsden and J.D. Wright (eds.) Handbook of Survey Research. Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp. 551–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. et al (2009) Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet. Social Science Research 38(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D., Smyth, J. and Christian, L. (2008) Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D.A., Eltinge, J., Groves, R.M. and Little, R.J.A. (2002) Survey nonresponse in design, data collection, and analysis. In: R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J. Eltinge and R.J.A. Little (eds.) Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, M., Kerr, N.J., Rimmer, R. and Shiu, E.M. (2006) Assessing the quality of police services using SERVQUAL. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 29(1): 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, B.J. and Burgess, M.B. (2012) Putting Fear of Crime on the Map: Investigating Perceptions of Crime using Geographic Information Systems. New York: Springer eBooks.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, L.M. and Simper, R. (2005) The measurement of police force efficiency: An assessment of U.K. Home Office policy. Contemporary Economic Policy 23(4): 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., Bannister, J., Ditton, J. and Gilchrist, E. (1997) Questioning the measurement of the ‘fear of crime’: Findings from a major methodological study. The British Journal of Criminology 37(4): 658–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K.F. and LaGrange, R. (1987) The measurement of fear of crime. Sociological Inquiry 57(1): 70–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R. and Yan, T. (2005) An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(3): 370–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., Speizer, H. and Wiitala, W. (2008) Telephone and web: Mixed-mode challenge. Health Services Research 43(1): 230–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E. and Tourangeau, R. (2004) Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C. (1996) Fear of crime: A review of the literature. International Review of Victimology 4(2): 79–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennigan, K.M., Maxson, C.L., Sloane, D. and Ranney, M. (2002) Community views on crime and policing: Survey mode effects on bias in community surveys. Justice Quarterly 19(3): 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäckle, A., Roberts, C. and Lynn, P. (2010) Assessing the effect of data collection mode on measurement. International Statistical Review 78(1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G. and Schuman, H. (1982) The effect of the question on survey responses: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) 145(1): 42–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lensvelt-Mulders, G. (2008) Surveying sensitive topics. In: E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox and D. Dillman (eds.) International Handbook of Survey Methodology. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis Group), pp. 461–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, B.L., Edwards, M.L. and Dillman, D. (2012) Determinants of Item Nonresponse to Web and Mail Respondents in Three Address-based Mixed-mode Surveys of the General Public. Washington DC: Washington State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakshaug, J.W., Yan, T. and Tourangeau, R. (2010) Nonresponse error, measurement error, and mode of data collection: Tradeoffs in a multi-mode survey of sensitive and non-sensitive items. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 907–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, T.-H. and Fan, X. (2008) Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods 20(3): 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G. (2006) The promise of community policing. In: D. Weisburd and A.A. Braga (eds.) Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R. and Yan, T. (2007) Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin 133(5): 859–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D.S. (2013) Policing identity crimes. Policing & Society 23(4): 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. and Eck, J.E. (2004) What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593(1): 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. and Tuch, S.A. (2005) Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly 8(3): 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, C., Fulton, J. and Tourangeau, R. (2011) More positive or more extreme? A meta-analysis of mode differences in response choice. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(2): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J.S., Lawton, B. and Longmire, D. (2010) An examination of the micro-level crime–fear of crime link. Crime and Delinquency, published online 10 November, doi: 10.1177/0011128710386203.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémi Boivin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boivin, R., Cordeau, G. Do Web surveys facilitate reporting less favourable opinions about law enforcement?. Secur J 30, 335–348 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.35

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.35

Keywords

Navigation