Abstract
A strong body of knowledge attests to the fact that Australian women are using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) at increasing rates. However, use of CAM in the context of maternity care is variable and distinctive because of heightened sensitivity to risk and the complexities that arise in managing maternal and foetal well-being concurrently. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 40 women who had recently given birth residing in a major city in Australia, we trace their use of CAM and biomedicine through a sequence of important health-care events during their pregnancies and up until the point of labour. We show that these women’s engagement with CAM and biomedicine depicts a pattern whereby CAM is used to ensure the women’s well-being while biomedicine is used to ensure a safe and healthy baby. We employ the concept of therapeutic dualism to analyse how this form of medical pluralism reproduces contemporary forms of pregnant embodiment – specifically the ontological separation of mother and foetus. However, we also highlight how this dualism is inexact. That is, bodies of medical knowledge may be separated and combined at specific points during pregnancy, and so too can the foetal and maternal body.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., Sibbritt, D., Easthope, G. and Young, A. (2003) The profile of women who consult alternative health practitioners in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 179 (6): 297–300.
Adams, J., Sibbritt, D. and Lui, C.-W. (2011) The use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: A longitudinal study of Australian women. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 38 (3): 200–206.
Anspach, R. (1988) Notes on the sociology of medical discourse: The language of case presentation. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 29 (4): 357–375.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008) Complementary therapies. In: Australian Social Trends 2008. Cat. no. 4102.0 Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Chapter5202008, accessed 4 January 2014.
Baarts, C. and Pedersen, I. (2009) Derivative benefits: Exploring the body through complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (5): 719–733.
Barnes, P., Bloom, B. and Nahin, R. (2008) Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. National Health Statistics Reports. no. 12. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
Bishop, F. and Yardley, L. (2004) Constructing agency in treatment decisions. Health 8 (4): 465–482.
Bix, A. (2004) Engendering alternatives: Women’s health care choices and feminist medical rebellions. In: R. Johnston (ed.) The Politics of Healing: Histories of Alternative Medicine in Twentieth-Century North America. New York: Routledge.
Broom, A. and Tovey, P. (2007) The dialectical tension between individuation and depersonalization in cancer patients’ mediation of complementary, alternative and biomedical cancer treatments. Sociology 41 (6): 1021–1039.
Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Connor, L. (2004) Relief, risk and renewal: Mixed therapy regimens in an Australian suburb. Social Science and Medicine 59 (8): 1695–1705.
Coulter, I. and Willis, E. (2007) Explaining the growth of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Sociology Review 16 (3–4): 214–225.
Doel, M. and Segrott, J. (2003) Self, health, and gender: Complementary and alternative medicine in the British mass media. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 10 (2): 131–144.
Ezzy, D. (2002) Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Australia, Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.
Frawley, J., Adams, J., Sibbritt, D., Steele, A., Broom, A. and Gallois, C. (2013) Prevalence and determinants of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use during pregnancy: Results from a nationally representative sample of Australian pregnant women. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 53 (4): 347–352.
Glover, D.D., Amonkar, M., Rybeck, B.F. and Tracy, T.S. (2003) Prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal medicine use in a rural, obstetric population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188 (4): 1039–1045.
Golden, J. (2005) Message in a Bottle: The Making of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hanssen, B., Grimsgaard, S., Launsoslash, L., Foslashnneboslash, V., Falkenberg, T. and Rusmussen, N. (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in the Scandinavian countries. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 23 (1): 57–62.
Harris, G., Connor, L., Bisits, A. and Higginbotham, N. (2004) ‘Seeing the baby’: Pleasures and dilemmas of ultrasound technologies for primiparous Australian women. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18 (1): 23–47.
Hepner, D., Harnett, M., Segall, S., Camann, W., Bader, A. and Tsen, L. (2002) Herbal medicine use in parturients. Anesthesia & Analgesia 94 (3): 690–693.
Li, Z., McNally, L. and Sullivan, E. (2011) Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2009. Perinatal Statistics Series. Sydney, Australia: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit.
Locock, L., Alexander, J. and Rozmovits, L. (2008) Women’s responses to nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Midwifery 24 (2): 143–152.
Luff, D. and Thomas, K. (2000) Getting somewhere, feeling cared for: Patient perspectives on complementary and alternative medicine. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 8 (4): 253–259.
Lupton, D. (ed.) (1999) Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lupton, D. (2012) ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health 22 (3): 329–340.
Lupton, D. and Schmied, V. (2013) Splitting bodies/selves: Women’s concepts of embodiment at the moment of birth. Sociology of Health and Illness 35 (6): 828–841.
Maats, F. and Crowther, C. (2002) Patterns of vitamin, mineral and herbal supplement use prior to and during pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 42 (5): 494–496.
Marteau, T. et al (1992) Psychological models in predicting uptake of prenatal screening. Psychology & Health 6 (1–2): 13–22.
Mclean, S. (2005) ‘The illness is part of the person’: Discourses of blame, individual responsibility and individuation at a centre for spiritual healing in the north of England. Sociology of Health and Illness 27 (5): 628–648.
Mellin, G. and Katzenstein, M. (1962) The saga of Thalidomide: Neuropathy to embryopathy, with case reports of congenital anomalies. The New England Journal of Medicine 267: 1184–1193.
Meurk, C., Broom, A., Adams, J. and Sibbritt, D. (2012) Bodies of knowledge: Nature, holism and women’s plural health practices. Health 17 (3): 300–318.
Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (2011) What is complementary and alternative medicine? //nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam, accessed 1 November 2011.
Potter, D. (2012) Drawing the line at drinking for two: Governmentality, biopolitics, and risk in state legislation on fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. In: J. Netherland (ed.) Critical Perspectives on Addiction. (Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol. 14) Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 129–153.
Re, W. (2003) Herbal healing in pregnancy: Women’s experiences. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy 3 (4): 17–39.
Ruzek, S. (1978) The Women’s Health Movement. New York: Praeger.
Searle, J. (1996) Fearing the worst – Why do pregnant women feel ‘at risk’? Australia and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 36 (3): 279–286.
Sharma, U. (1992) Complementary Medicine Today. Practitioners and Patients. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Sointu, E. (2006) Healing bodies, feeling bodies: Embodiment and alternative and complementary health practices. Social Theory and Health 4 (3): 203–220.
Sointu, E. (2011) Detraditionalisation, gender, and alternative and complementary medicines. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (3): 356–371.
Squier, S. (1996) Fetal subjects and maternal objects: Reproductive technology and the new fetal/maternal relation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5): 515–535.
Tovey, P. and Adams, J. (2001) Primary care as intersecting social worlds. Social Science and Medicine 52 (5): 695–706.
Tsui, B., Dennehy, C. and Tsourounis, C. (2001) A survey of dietary supplement use during pregnancy at an academic medical center. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185 (2): 433–437.
Upsdell, M. and Jaye, C. (2011) Engaging with complementary and alternative medicine in general practice. Journal of Primary Health Care 3 (1): 29–34.
Zadoroznyj, M. (2001) Birth and the ‘reflexive consumer’: Trust, risk and medical dominance in obstetric encounters. Journal of Sociology 37 (2): 117–139.
Acknowledgements
This article is based on research conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, the University of Newcastle and the University of Queensland. We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing for funding and to the women who provided the survey data. We thank the Australian Research Council (ARC) for funding the research via a discovery Project Grant (DP1094765) and for funding Associate Professor Alex Broom via a Future Fellowship (FT100100294). We also thank the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for funding Professor Jon Adams via a Career Development Fellowship. Thanks to Mary-Anne Paton for her copy-editing and final preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meurk, C., Broom, A. & Adams, J. Relative bodies of knowledge: Therapeutic dualism and maternal–foetal individuation. Soc Theory Health 12, 159–178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.26
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.26