Abstract
It is now widely accepted that health inequalities are directly linked to inequalities in power and material resources. Reflecting this, persuasive accounts of both the production of health inequalities and the failure of high-income countries to reduce these inequalities have been underpinned by references to structural (particularly neo-Marxist) theories of power. Such accounts highlight the importance of macro-level political and economic policies for health outcomes and, in particular, the unequally damaging impacts of policy reforms collectively referred to as ‘neo-liberal’. This article draws on interviews with researchers, civil servants, politicians, documentary makers and journalists (all of whom have undertaken work concerning health inequalities) to examine what these conversations reveal about these actors’ perceptions of, and responses to, the political context of health inequalities in the United Kingdom. In so doing, it illustrates the fluid and networked nature of political ‘power’ and ‘context’, findings that point to the potential utility of post-structural theories of power. This article argues that, if conceived of in ways that do not deny power differentials, post-structural theories can help: (i) call attention to ‘neo-liberal’ inconsistencies and (ii) explain how and why individuals who are critical of dominant policy approaches nonetheless appear to participate in their ongoing production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. (1997) Economies of power and space. In: J. Wills and R. Lee (eds.) Economic Geographies: Representations and Interpretations. Chapter 5. London: Arnold.
Black, D., Morris, J.N., Smith, C. and Townsend, P. (1980) Inequalities in Health – Report of a Research Working Group. London: Department of Health and Social Services.
Blair, T. (2011) A Journey. London: Arrow.
Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–233.
Campbell, J.L. (2002) Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 21–38.
Carlisle, S. (2001) Inequalities in health: Contested explanations, shifting discourses and ambiguous policies. Critical Public Health 11 (3): 267–281.
Carmel, E. and Papadopoulos, T. (2003) The new governance of social security in Britain. In: J. Millar (ed.) Understanding Social Security: Issues for Social Policy and Practice. Bristol, CT: Policy Press.
Centeno, M.A. and Cohen, J.N. (2012) The arc of neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 317–340.
Coburn, D. (2004) Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: Class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities. Social Science and Medicine 58 (1): 41–56.
Collini, S. (2011) From Robbins to McKinsey. Review of Higher Education: Students at the Heart of the System. London Review of Books 33 (16): pp 9–14.
Crawford, R. (1977) You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation 7 (4): 663–680.
Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
Foucault, M. (1982[1969]) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Vintage.
Katikireddi, S.V., Higgins, M., Smith, K.E. and Williams, G. (2013) Editorial: Health inequalities – The need to move beyond bad behaviours. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 67 (9): 715–716.
Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: University Press.
Larner, W. (2003) Guest editorial: Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21 (5): 509–512.
Latour, B. (1988 [1984]) The Pasteurization of France. London: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J.N. (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research 5 (4): 379–393.
Law, J. and Urry, J. (2004) Enacting the social. Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410.
Levitas, R.A. (2001) Against work: A Utopian incursion into social policy. Critical Social Policy 21 (4): 449–465.
Levitas, R.A. (2004) Lets hear it for Humpty: Social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends 13 (2): 41–56.
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mackenbach, J.P. (2010) Has the English strategy to address health inequalities failed? Social Science & Medicine 71 (7): 1249–1253.
Mullin, C. (2010) A View from the Foothills: The diaries of Chris Mullin. London: Profile Books.
Munck, R. (2003) Neoliberalism, necessitarianism and alternatives in Latin America: There is no alternative (TINA)? Third World Quarterly 24 (3): 495–511.
Muntaner, C. and Lynch, J. (1999) Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: A critique of Wilkinson’s neo-Durkheimian research program. International Journal of Health Services 29 (1): 59–81.
Murdoch, J. and Marsden, T. (1995) The spatialization of politics: Local and national actor spaces in environmental conflict. The Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20 (3): 368–380.
Navarro, V. (ed.) (2007) Neoliberalsim, globalization and inequalities: Consequences for health and quality of life. Policy, Politics, Health and Medicine Series. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
Navarro, V. and Shi, L. (2001) The political context of social inequalities and health. Social Science and Medicine 52 (3): 481–491.
Navarro, V. et al (2006) Politics and health outcomes. Lancet 368 (9540): 1033–1037.
OECD. (2015) In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Peck, J. (2004) Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography 28 (3): 392–405.
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by A. Goldhammer Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C.E. (1993) Policy Learning and Change: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schrecker, T. and Bambra, C. (2015) How Politics Makes Us Sick: Neoliberal Epidemics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scott-Samuel, A. (2004) New Labour's New Idea – Health Promotion. Liverpool, UK: Politics of Health Group.
Smith, K.E. (2013) Beyond Evidence Based Policy in Public Health: The Interplay of Ideas. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, K.E. and Kandlik Eltanani, M. (2015) What kinds of policies to reduce health inequalities in the UK do researchers support? Journal of Public Health 37 (1): 6–17.
Tickell, A. and Peck, J. (2003) Making global rules: Globalization or neoliberalization? In: J. Peck and H.C.-W. Yeung (eds.) Remaking the Global Economy: Economic-Geographical Perspectives. London: Sage, pp. 163–181.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by: a University of Edinburgh cross-college studentship; an ESRC-MRC Post-Doctoral Fellowship (grant number: PTA-037-27-0181); and an ESRC Future Research Leaders Grant (grant number: ES/K001728/1). Significant thanks are due to all of the interviewees as well as Liz Bondi, John Frank, Richard Freeman, Nasar Meer, Richard Mitchell and Susan J. Smith, all of whom provided helpful feedback on earlier versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K. Understanding responses to the political context of health inequalities in research and policy: Can post-structural theories of power help?. Soc Theory Health 13, 355–376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2015.24
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2015.24