Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advocacy for unborn sperm donor-conceived children and family policy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Theory & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extant family policy in the United States relates to children who are already born. We propose that this policy should be extended in order to enhance the psychological welfare of children prior to their conception. We use the sperm banking industry as a case study, and theorize extended donor profiles as constituting socializing text for the donor offspring. Building on the identity process theory and the concept of genealogical bewilderment, we assume that many sperm recipients, especially single mothers and lesbian couples, may want to show their future children the profile of their father. Informed by Connell’s Hegemonic Masculinity theory, we content analyzed 180 extended sperm donor profiles from six American sperm banks and found that traditional masculinity prevails. Hence, we contend that there is a discrepancy between the monolithic, traditional way masculinity is performed through the text and the diverse masculinities, gender roles and family types of the donor offspring’s reality; experiencing such discrepancies may cause some stress in offspring. We propose that family policy should be expanded and elaborated to regulate the contents of extended profiles, in order to ensure a repertoire of a greater diversity of family structures as well as a variety of masculinities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The names given in this paper are pseudonyms.

References

  • Adrian, S.W. (2010) Sperm stories: Policies and practices of sperm banking in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeling, R. (2011) Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASA (American Sociological Association). (2015) ASA Code of ethics. http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm, accessed 20 December 2012.

  • Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2010) Varieties of second modernity: The cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. British Journal of Sociology 61 (3): 409–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biller, H.B. and Kimpton, J.L. (1997) The father and the school-aged child. In: M.E. Lamb (ed.) The Role of the Father in Child Development, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, pp. 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn, D. (1995) Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, E. (2002) Information on genetic origins in donor-assisted conception: Is knowing who you are a human rights issue? Human Fertility 5 (4): 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K. (2014) Family Policy Matters: How Policymaking Affects Families and What Professionals Can Do, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K. and Corbett, T.J. (2010) Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and subfield of social policy [family policy decade review]. Journal of Marriage and Family 72 (3): 783–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2014) Becoming familiar with eternal anonymity: How sperm banks use relationship marketing. Consumption, Markets & Culture 18 (2): 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2015a) How do anonymous sperm donors signal credibility through their self presentations? Health Sociology Review 24 (1): 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2015b, in press) The golden cage of sperm banking industry. Women’s Studies International Forum. (special Issue:Choosing Mothering?) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.01.004.

  • Bokek-Cohen, Y. and Gonen, L.D. (2015) Sperm and simulacra: Emotional capitalism and sperm donation industry. New Genetics and Society 34 (3): 243–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G.M. (1986) Coping with Threatened Identities. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G.M. (1996) Identity processes and social changes. In: G.M. Breakwell and E. Lyons (eds.) Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryld, M. (2001) The infertility clinic and the birth of the lesbian: The political debate on assisted reproduction in Denmark. European Journal of Women’s Studies 8 (3): 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. (1987) Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. (2005) Masculinities. 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, A. (2010) ‘I just want more information about who I am’: The search experience of sperm-donor offspring, searching for information about their donors and genetic heritage. Information Research 15(2), paper 428. http://InformationR.net/ir/15-2/paper428.html, accessed 23 June 2015.

  • Daniels, C. (ed.) (1998) Lost Fathers: The Politics of Fatherlessness in America. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, K. and Haimes, E. (1998) Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2009) Gamete donation: Parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction 1 (1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A., Kinkler, L., Richardson, H.B. and Downing, J.B. (2011) On the border: Young adults with LGBQ parents navigate LGBTQ communities. Journal of Counseling Psychology. Advance online publication, doi: 10.1037/a0024576.

  • Hanson, A.F. (2001) Donor insemination: Eugenic and feminist implications. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (3): 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann-Green, L.K. and Gehring, T.M. (2007) The German lesbian family study planning for parenthood via donor insemination. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 3 (4): 351–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, M. and Humphrey, H. (1986) A fresh look at genealogical bewilderment. British Journal of Medical Psychology 59 (2): 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A.G. and Davis, J.F. (1994) Hidden voices of black men: The meaning, structure and complexity of manhood. Journal of Black Studies 25 (1): 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBISWorld. (2014) Sperm banks in the US: Market research report, https://www.ibisworld.com/industry/sperm-banks.html, 8 January 2015.

  • Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2009) The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: Comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction 24 (8): 1909–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S.B. and Kahn, A.J. (eds.) (1997) Family Change and Family Policies in Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the U.S. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klock, S.C., Jacob, M.C. and Maier, D. (1996) A comparison of single and married recipients of donor insemination. Human Reproduction 11 (11): 2554–2557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, M. (2013) Genetic knowledge and family identity: Managing gamete donation in Britain and Germany. Sociology 47 (5): 939–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroløkke, C. (2009) Click a donor: Viking masculinity on the line. Journal of Consumer Culture 9 (1): 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2000) Conceptualizing and measuring gender ideology as an identity. Gender and Society 14 (3): 368–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2009) Exploring the consequences of gender ideology – Work discrepancies. Sex Roles 60 (5–6): 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, J. and Borg, S. (1994) In Search of Parenthood: Coping with Infertility and High Tech Conception. London: Pandora Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblum, S.R., Palmer, M.G. and Spector, I.P. (1995) Non-traditional mothers: Singleheterosexual/lesbian women and lesbian couples electing motherhood via donor insemination. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 16 (1): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R.F. and Majors, R.G. (1997) An investigation into variations in the construction of the male gender role among young African American and European American women and men. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health 2: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahlstedt, P.P., LaBounty, K. and Kennedy, W.T. (2010) The views of adult offspring of sperm donation. Essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Fertility and Sterility 93 (7): 2236–2246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamo, L. (2005) Biomedicalizing kinship: Sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties. Science as Culture 14 (3): 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamo, L. (2007) Negotiating conception: Lesbians’ hybrid-technological practices. Science Technology & Human Values 32 (3): 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L.J. (2007) Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. and Golombok, S. (2005) Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: Follow-up at age 2 years. Human Reproduction 20 (6): 1655–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011) The future of families to 2030 – A synthesis report. http://www.oecd.org/sti/futures/49093502.pdf, accessed 8 March 2014.

  • Pennings, G. (2000) The right to choose your donor: A step towards commercialization or a step towards empowering the patient? Human Reproduction 15 (3): 508–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J.H., Sonenstein, F.L. and Ku, L.C. (1994) Attitudes toward male roles: A discriminant validity analysis. Sex Roles 30 (7): 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1993) American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family 55 (3): 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1996) Life Without Father. New York: Martin Pressler Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sants, H.J. (1964) Genealogical bewilderment in children with substitute parents. British Journal of Medical Psychology 37 (2): 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheib, J.E., Riordan, M. and Rubin, S. (2005) Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: Reports from 12–17 year olds. Human Reproduction 20 (1): 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, I. and Gustavson, M. (2012) Findings Sweden. In: U. Streib-Brziĉ and C. Quadflied (eds.) ‘School is Out’ Comparative Study: Experiences of Children from Rainbow Families in Germany, Sweden, and Slovenia. Report. Berlin: Humboldt University, pp. 59–72.

  • SGI (Sustainable governance indicators). (2014) Families report: Family policy. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. http://www.sgi-network.org/docs/2014/thematic/SGI2014_Families.pdf, accessed 8 August 2014.

  • Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk Text and Interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spar, D.L. (2006) The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. (2007) Sperm Donor Offspring: Identity and Other Experiences. Charleston, SC: Booksurge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, R. (1982) Black Masculinity: The Black Male’s Role in American Society. San Francisco, CA: Black scholar press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenon, O. (2011) Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review 37 (1): 57–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A.J. and Coyle, A. (2000) What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction 15 (9): 2041–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Ariel University, POB 3, Ariel, 44837, Israel

    Ya’arit Bokek-Cohen

  2. Department of Sociology, Bar-Ilan University, Max Ve’Anna Web st, Ramat-Gan, 5290002, Israel

    Ya’arit Bokek-Cohen

  3. Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, POB 3, Ariel, 44837, Israel

    Limor Dina Gonen

Authors
  1. Ya’arit Bokek-Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Limor Dina Gonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya’arit Bokek-Cohen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bokek-Cohen, Y., Gonen, L. Advocacy for unborn sperm donor-conceived children and family policy. Soc Theory Health 14, 207–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2015.29

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2015.29

Keywords

Search

Navigation