Skip to main content
Log in

Contested professional rationales for the assessment of mental health problems: Can social theories help?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Theory & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For health and social care practitioners, the accurate understanding of mental health problems is an important aspect of their effective amelioration. The practices of diagnosis and formulation have both been used for this task. The first has been associated with individual cases being allocated to pre-existing professionally agreed categories. The second is typically expressed by some form of tailored description of the patient's presenting problems in his or her life context. Both diagnoses and formulations are thus traceable to professional assumptions, expressed in codified forms of knowledge. This article provides a description of the tensions between diagnostic- and formulation-based mental health assessments. The picture emerging of theoretical contestation and practical compromise is then considered in relation to the potential sense-making value of social theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, P. and Wallace, C. (eds.) (1990) The Sociology of the Caring Professions. London: Farmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1947) Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist 2 (12): 539–558.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington DC: APA.

  • Baruch, G. and Treacher, A. (1978) Psychiatry Observed. London: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentall, R.P., Jackson, H. and Pilgrim, D. (1988) Abandoning the concept of schizophrenia: Some implications of validity arguments for psychological research into psychotic phenomena. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 27: 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, P.J. and Kuyken, W. (2003) Is cognitive case formulation science or science fiction? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 10 (1): 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blashfield, R.K. and Burgess, D.R. (2007) Classification provides an essential basis for organizing mental disorders. In: S.O. Lilienfield and W.T. O’Donohue (eds.) The Great Ideas of Clinical Science: 17 Principles that Every Mental Health Professional Should Understand. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1995) Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra issue: 34–52.

  • Butler, G. (1999) Clinical formulation. Comprehensive Clinical Psychology 6: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. and McNulty, M. (2006) Classification and epidemiology. In: A. Carr and M. McNulty (eds.) The Handbook of Clinical Psychology: An Evidence-based Practice Approach. London: Routledge, pp. 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2004) What is wrong with DSM? History of Psychiatry 15 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (1973) Approaches to Insanity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crellin, C. (1998) Origins and social contexts of the term ‘formulation’ in psychological case-reports. Clinical Psychology Forum 112: 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2005) Contesting Psychiatry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSwaan, A. (1990) The Management of Normality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, K. (1981) Madmen and the Bourgeoisie: A Social History of Psychiatry and Insanity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, B.P. (1998) A psychosocial perspective on the past and future of psychiatric epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 147 (3): 222–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Double, D. (1990) What would Adolf Meyer have thought about the neo-Kraepelinian approach? Psychiatric Bulletin 1: 471–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (ed.) (2002) Handbook of Individual Therapy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T.D. (2002) Formulation. Encyclopedia of Psychotherapy 1: 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. (1980) The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry 137: 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1975) The Future of Psychiatry. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988) Technologies of the self. In: L. Martin (ed.) Technologies of the Self. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, G. (1984) The Boulder model: History, rationale, and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 15 (3): 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedson, E. (1970) The Profession of Medicine. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: Some Notes on Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. (1997) The Anti-depressant Era. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsie, L.E. (1931) Criticism of treatment and recovery in schizophrenia. Proceedings of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease for 1928. Schizophrenia (dementia praecox). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

  • Ingleby, D. (ed.) (1980) Critical Psychiatry. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, D. (1985) Mental health and social order. In: S. Cohen and A. Scull (eds.) Social Control and the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L. (2006) Controversies and debates about formulation. In: L. Johnstone and R. Dallos (eds.) Formulation in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Making Sense of People's Problems. London: Routledge, pp. 208–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L. and Dallos, R. (2006) Introduction to formulation. In: L. Johnstone and R. Dallos (eds.) Formulation in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Making Sense of People's Problems. London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S.A. and Kutchins, H. (1988) The business of diagnosis: DSM III and clinical social work. Social Work 33: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S.A. and Kutchins, H. (1994) The myth of the reliability of DSM. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 15 (1 and 2): 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraepelin, E. (1883) Compendium der Psychiatrie. Leipzig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R.D. (1959) The Divided Self. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.A. and Corrie, S. (2006) The Modern Scientist-practitioner. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. (1974) Beyond reach: The social reaction to deviance. Social Problems 21: 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, S. and Armstrong, D. (2006) Social determinants of diagnostic labels in depression. Social Science and Medicine 62 (1): 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, N. (1994) Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellsop, G.W. (2006) A concise conceptualisation of formulation. Academic Psychiatry 30 (5): 424–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moncrieff, J. (2008) The Myth of the Chemical Cure. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, R. and Cassels, A. (2005) Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies Are Turning Us All into Patients. New York: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentony, P. (1981) Models of Influence in Psychotherapy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J.B. and Mikami, A.Y. (2002) Strategies for handling treatment failure successfully. Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice/Training 39 (2): 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, D. (2007) The survival of psychiatric diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine 65: 536–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, D. (2008) The eugenic legacy in psychology and psychiatry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 54: 272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, D. and Bentall, R.P. (1998) The medicalisation of misery: A critical realist analysis of the concept of depression. Journal of Mental Health 8 (3): 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, D. and Treacher, A. (1992) Clinical Psychology Observed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimy, V.C. (1950) Training in Clinical Psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. and Pilgrim, D. (2003) Mental Health and Inequality. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1990) Governing the Soul. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. (1983) Removing the blinkers? A critique of recent contributions to the sociology of the professions. Sociological Review 33: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S.B. (1981) An asocial psychology and a misdirected clinical psychology. American Psychologist 36 (8): 827–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. (1966) Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.J. and Sembi, S. (2006) Cognitive behaviour therapy treatment failures in practice: The neglected role of diagnostic inaccuracy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 34: 491–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (1979) Museums of Madness. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (1985) Humanitarianism or control? Some observations on the historiography of Anglo-American psychiatry. In: S. Cohen and A. Scull (eds.) Social Control and the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, B. (1990) On the disorder of things: Sociology and the end of the social. Sociology 24 (3): 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1985) Shellshock and the psychologists. In: W.F. Bynum, R. Porter and M. Shepherd (eds.) The Anatomy of Madness. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T.S. (1961) The use of naming and the origin of the myth of mental illness. American Psychologist 16: 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T.S. (1963) Law, Liberty and Psychiatry. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrier, N. et al (1998) A randomised control trial of intense cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic schizophrenia. British Medical Journal 317: 303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J.C. (1992) The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 4 (3): 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1993) DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: A history. American Journal of Psychiatry 150 (3): 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, L. (1925) Psychological diagnosis and the psychonomic orientation of analytic science. The Psychological Clinic 16 (1 & 2): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Pilgrim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilgrim, D., Carey, T. Contested professional rationales for the assessment of mental health problems: Can social theories help?. Soc Theory Health 8, 309–325 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2010.11

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2010.11

Keywords

Navigation