Abstract
Seldom do studies on welfare regimes and health take a global perspective. Usually most research on this genre concentrates on high-income countries only, few studies include low- and middle-income countries, and even fewer examinations combine a large number of countries to obtain a worldwide view. For this, we need global welfare regime typologies that would allow for such examinations. Given this, we investigated the usefulness of the Wood and Gough welfare regime typology on 49 countries by examining the association between welfare regimes and self-reported individual disability worldwide. The World Health Survey data were examined on 207 818 people from 49 countries using the welfare regime classification developed by Wood and Gough. Multilevel logistic regression was used to investigate links between disability and welfare regimes while also accounting for individual-level socioeconomic factors. Variations in individual disability prevalence were found within the different welfare regimes. For example, odds of poor health prevalence for citizens within the insecurity Sub-Saharan African regime as compared with the European-conservative regime were OR=1.83 95 per cent CI: 0.85–3.95. Living in a state-organized regime was associated with lower odds of disability prevalence, as higher odds of disability prevalence were observed in all non-state regimes (with the exception of the productivist regime). For instance, the people in the productivist regime of East Asia reported similar prevalence of poor health odds as compared with the European-conservative regime (OR=0.94 95 per cent CI: 0.45–1.99). This short report found that the Wood and Gough typology enables the study of welfare regimes and health globally, and appears to be a useful tool in welfare regime type research. The productivist regime seems to have health protective features that are on par with European welfare state regimes. We recommend that this finding is investigated further in future empirical analyses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdul, K.S., Eikemo, T.A. and Bambra, C. (2010) Welfare state regimes and population health: Integrating the East Asian welfare states. Health Policy 94 (1): 45–53.
Bambra, C. (2007) Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism: Regime theory and public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61 (12): 1098–1102.
Bambra, C. and Eikemo, T.A. (2009) Welfare state regimes, unemployment and health: A comparative study of the relationship between unemployment and self-reported health in 23 European countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63 (2): 92–98.
Bambra, C. et al (2009) Gender, health inequalities and welfare state regimes: A cross-national study of 13 European countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63 (1): 38–44.
Beckfield, J. and Krieger, N. (2009) Epi+demos+cracy: Linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities – Evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. Epidemiology 31 (1): 152–177.
Chung, H. and Muntaner, C. (2007) Welfare state matters: A typological multilevel analysis of wealthy countries. Health Policy 80 (2): 328–339.
Chung, H. and Muntaner, C. (2008) Welfare regime types and global health: An emerging challenge. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 62 (4): 282–283.
Eikemo, T.A., Bambra, C., Joyce, K. and Dahl, E. (2008) Welfare state regimes and income-related health inequalities: A comparison of 23 European countries. European Journal of Public Health 18 (6): 593–599.
Ferrera, M. (1996) The southern model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.
Franzoni, J. (2008) Welfare regimes in Latin America: Capturing constellations of markets, families, and policies. Latin American Politics and Society 50 (2): 67–100.
Gough, I., Wood, G., Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P. and Room, G. (2004) Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts. Cambridge: University Press.
Lahelma, E. et al (2002) Analysing changes of health inequalities in the Nordic welfare states. Social science & medicine 55 (4): 609–625.
Lundberg, O. (2008) Commentary: Politics and public health – Some conceptual considerations concerning welfare state characteristics and public health outcomes. International Journal of Epidemiology 37 (5): 1105–1108.
Rudra, N. (2007) Welfare states in developing countries: Unique or universal? Journal of Politics 69 (2): 378–396.
Sainsbury, D. (ed.) (1999) Gender, policy regimes and politics. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–276.
Tang, K.I. (2005) Ian Gough and Geof Wood with Armando Barrientos, Philipa Bevan, Peer Davis and Graham Room, insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. (Book Review). Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-138811128.html, accessed 1 April 2010.
Üstün, T. et al (2001) WHO multi-country survey study on health and responsiveness 2000–2001, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whspaper37.pdf, accessed 1 Feburary 2010.
Wood, G. and Gough, I. (2006) A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development 34 (10): 1696–1712.
World Health Organization. (2010) World Health Survey, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/en/index.html, accessed 1 Feburary 2010.
Acknowledgements
This article uses data from the WHO World Health Surveys/Multi-country Survey Study. Funding: VENI career grant (number 916.96.059) awarded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) to OAA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Witvliet, M., Arah, O., Stronks, K. et al. Taking welfare state regime research globally: An application of the Wood and Gough typology to individual health. Soc Theory Health 9, 355–366 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2011.19
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2011.19