Skip to main content
Log in

The domestication of an everyday health technology: A case study of electric toothbrushes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Theory & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the electric toothbrush as an example, this article examines the growing acceptability of domestic health technologies that blur the traditional boundaries between health, aesthetics and consumption. By using empirical material from individual and household interviews about people’s oral health practices, this research explores the relationships between an everyday artefact, its users and their environments. It investigates the ways in which oral health technologies do, or do not, become domesticated in the home environment. We conclude that the domestication of oral health technologies is not inevitable, with the electric toothbrush often becoming an ‘unstable object’ in the domestic setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This study received ethical approval from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine’s ethics committee before the fieldwork commenced.

References

  • Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992) A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In: W.E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aune, M. (1996) The computer in everyday life: Patterns of domestication of a new technology. In: M. Lie and K.H. Sørensen (eds.) Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technologies into Everyday Life. Oslo, Norway: SUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunton, R. and Burrows, R. (1995) Consumption and health in the ‘epidemiological’ clinic of late modern medicine. In: R. Bunton, S. Netttleton and R. Burrows (eds.) The Sociology of Health Promotion. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1987) Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T.J. Pinch (eds.) The Social Construction of Technical Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Exley, C. (2009) Bridging a gap: the (lack of a) sociology of oral health and healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (7): 1093–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N., Ward, K. and O’Rourke, A.J. (2005) The ‘expert patient’: Empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the internet. Social Science & Medicine 60 (6): 1299–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. and Ward, K. (2006) Health identities: From expert patient to resisting consumer. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 10 (4): 461–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. and Hart, L. (1999) The impact of context on data. In: R. Barbour and J. Kitzinger (eds.) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardim, J., Alves, L. and Maltz, M. (2009) The history and global market of oral home-care products. Brazilian Oral Research 23 (Special Issue 1): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1994) The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness 16 (1): 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992) Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In: W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, M. and Sørensen, K.H. (eds.) (1996) Making technology our own? Domesticating technologies into everyday life. In: Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technologies into Everyday Life. Oslo, Norway: SUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, K. and Travers, B. (1998) World of Invention. Washington DC: Gale Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2000) Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (1997) Inoculating gadgets against ridicule. Science as Culture 6 (2): 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielczarek, M. et al (2012) A novel power toothbrush with multi-directional, triple zone cleaning technology. American Journal of Dentistry 25 (Special Issue A): 4A–9A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S. (1988) Protecting a vulnerable margin: Towards an analysis of how the mouth came to be separated from the body. Sociology of Health & Illness 10 (2): 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S. (1991) Wisdom, diligence, and teeth: Discursive practices and the creation of mothers. Sociology of Health & Illness 13: 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S. (1992) Power, Pain and Dentistry. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (eds.) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri, Jupp, B. and Bentley, T. (1996) Open Wide: Futures for Dentistry in 2010. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (1996) Actor network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of Health & Illness 18 (2): 198–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A. (2003) Constructing expertise: In a third wave of science studies? Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. and Southerton, D. (2000) Defrosting the freezer: From novelty to convenience. Journal of Material Culture 5 (3): 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R., Hirsh, E. and Morley, D. (1992) Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: R. Silverstone and E. Hirsh (eds.) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Starr Sered, S. and Fernandopulle, R. (2005) Uninsured in America: Life and Death in the Land of Opportunity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorogood, N. (2000) Mouthrules and the construction of sexual identities. Sexualities 3 (2): 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelton, H. (2004) Overview of the impact of changing global patterns of dental caries experience on caries clinical trials. Journal of Dental Research 83 (S1): C29–C34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V. (2012) SmithKline Beecham Healthcare (SBCH): Dr Best Flex toothbrush. In: P. Doyle and S. Bridgewater (eds.) Innovations in Marketing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, S., Green, J. & Thorogood, N. The domestication of an everyday health technology: A case study of electric toothbrushes. Soc Theory Health 11, 344–367 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.15

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.15

Keywords

Navigation