Skip to main content
Log in

Subjectivity or Psycho-Discursive Practices? Investigating Complex Intersectional Identities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers some of the ways in which the concept of “subjectivity” has been defined and, in particular, the ways in which it has been contrasted with “identity”. It argues that given this intellectual history, the concept of subjectivity is a problematic place to begin re-investigating and re-formulating the terrain of the psychological and the social. Problems with notions of subjectivity are particularly vivid in psychoanalytic psycho-social research with its critique of post-structuralist discourse analysis and its re-inscription of interiority. An alternative focus on psycho-discursive practices is recommended. Psycho-discursive practices are recognizable, conventional, collective and social procedures through which character, self, identity, the psychological, the emotional, motives, intentions and beliefs are performed, formulated and constituted. It is argued that qualitative research on identities is now sufficiently sophisticated to be able to leave behind older distinctions between publicly defined “identity” and the private self evoked by the notion of subjectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, L. (2002). Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late Modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1989). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brah, A. and Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a Woman?: Revisiting Intersectionality. International Journal of Women's Studies, 15 (3), pp. 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S., Phoenix, A. and Pattman, R. (2002). Young Masculinities: Understanding Boys in Contemporary Society. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, P. (2004). After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture?. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2005). Panic and Perjury: A Psycho-social Exploration of Agency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (2), pp. 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnik, M. (2005). Interview with Philip Roth – ‘It No Longer Feels a Great Injustice that I have to Die’ (translated S. Paisley). The Guardian, 14 December.

  • Mead, G.H. (1982). The Individual and the Social Self. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.A. (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2002). Techniques for Telling the Reflexive Self. In May, T. (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage, pp. 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B., Wood, H. and Thumim, N. (2008). “Oh Goodness I am Watching ‘Reality’ TV”: How Methods Make Class in Audience Research. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11 (1), pp. 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, C. (2006). The Postcolonial Challenge: Towards Alternative Worlds. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (2003). Reclassifying Upward Mobility: Femininity and the Neo-liberal Subject. Gender and Education, 15 (3), pp. 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H. and Melody, J. (2000). Growing Up Girl: Gender and Class in the 21st Century. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 431–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2003). Paranoia, Ambivalence and Discursive Practices: Concepts of Position and Positioning in Psychoanalysis and Discursive Psychology. In Harre, R. and Moghaddam, F. (eds) The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political and Cultural Contexts. New York: Praeger/Greenwood Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2005). Unconscious conflict or everyday accountability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (2), pp. 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. and Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity: Imaginary Positions and Psycho-discursive Practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, pp. 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, E. (2005). My Lives. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Wetherell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wetherell, M. Subjectivity or Psycho-Discursive Practices? Investigating Complex Intersectional Identities. Subjectivity 22, 73–81 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.7

Keywords

Navigation