Abstract
This paper describes the social role of psychology as it took shape across the 20th century, and argues that it was, in large part, this social vocation that provided the conditions for psychology establishing itself as an academic discipline. The development of psychology in this period was bound up with changes in the understanding and treatment of distress, conceptions of normality and abnormality, techniques of regulation, normalization, reformation and correction; on child rearing and education, advertising, marketing and consumption technologies and the management of human behaviour in practices from the factory to the military. Psychological languages entered common sense and professional discourse across Europe and North America, in Australasia, in Latin America and in many other countries. Human beings came to understand themselves as inhabited by a deep interior psychological space, to evaluate themselves and to act upon themselves and others in terms of this belief. As we enter the 21st century, the deep psychological space that opened within us is beginning to flatten out, and our discontents are being mapped directly onto the brain. Will the 21st century still be the century of psychology?
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, F.H. (1935). Attitudes. In Murchison, C.A. (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press, pp. 1–50.
Allport, F.H (1936). Toward a Science of Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1, pp. 7–23.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The Historical Background of Modern Social Psychology. In Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T. and Lindzey, G. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley, pp. 1–80.
Ballard, P. (1920). Mental Tests. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Bavelas, A. and Lewin, K. (1942). Training in Democratic Leadership. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 37, pp. 115–119.
Boring, E. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. London: Century.
Brown, J.A.C. (1954). The Social Psychology of Industry. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Burt, C. (1921). Mental and Scholastic Tests. London: P.S. King & Son.
Burt, C. (1927). The Young Delinquent. London: University of London Press.
Canguilhem, G. ([1958], 1968). Qu'est-ce Que La Psychologie. In Canguilhem, G. (ed.) Études D'Histoire et De Philosophie Des Sciences. Paris: Vrin.
Canguilhem, G. (1991). The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Cartwright, D. and Zander, A. (1967). Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 3rd edn. London: Tavistock.
Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gallup, G. and Rae, S.F. (1940). The Pulse of Democracy: The Public Opinion Poll and How it Works. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hayek, F.A. (1976). The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewin, K. (1948). Conduct, knowledge and acceptance of new values. In Lewin, G.W. (ed.) Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. New York: Harper and Row.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R.K. (1939). Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates”. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, pp. 271–299.
Lippitt, R. (1939). Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Autocratic and Democratic Group Atmospheres. American Journal of Sociology, 45, pp. 26–49.
Lippitt, R. (1940). Studies on Experimentally Created Autocratic and Democratic Groups. University of Iowa Studies: Studies in Child Welfare, 16 (3), pp. 26–49.
Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilisation. New York: Macmillan.
Mayo, E. (1949). The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilisation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Miller, P. and O'Leary, T. (1989). Hierarchies and American Ideals, 1900–1940. Academy of Management Review, 14 (2), pp. 250–265.
Roethlisberger, F.J. and Dickson, W.J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rose, N. (1985). The Psychological Complex. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul: The Shape of the Private Self, 2nd edn. London: Free Association Books.
Rose, N. (2006). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R. and Sherif, C.W. (1961). Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
Taylor, F.W. (1913). Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.
Thomas, W.I. and Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vol. 1: Primary Group Organization. Boston: Badger.
Thurstone, L.L. (1928). Attitudes Can be Measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, pp. 529–554.
Vico, G. (1725). The First New Science. Pompa, L. (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, N. Psychology as a Social Science. Subjectivity 25, 446–462 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.30
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.30