Abstract
This paper explores the concept of transference–countertransference arguing that it holds out the promise of an inherently relational understanding of the unconscious dimensions of affective, felt and emotional experience. This argument is contrasted to Ian Burkitt's multi-dimensional model of affect, feeling and emotion which rejects the notion that these have unconscious dimensions understood in psychoanalytic terms. The paper suggests that there may be more grounds for dialogue between these approaches than those that meet the eye and that, as such, transference–countertransference may be a useful resource in the current putative ‘affective turn.’
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Brennan suggests that, although clinical accounts of transference–countertransference contain a relational model of affect and feeling, this is contradicted by the psychoanalytic concept of the subject. The latter is, for Brennan, a self-contained ‘bounded’ individual. This argument is, I would argue, difficult to sustain in the light of the relational and object relations literature. See, for instance, Bollas (1993).
Transference is not seen as a purely defensive or negative phenomenon. As Nancy Chodorow (1999, pp. 22–23) has argued, it is via transference and projective identification that the external world is brought subjectively to life.
Ogden stresses that, in analysis, it is the patient's transference that is the object of reflection. The analyst may privately reflect on his contribution to the transference but with the aim of understanding what this tells him about the patient.
It has been pointed out to me that at least elements of this argument – particularly the emphasis on repetition's location in the present – exist in Freud's own discussion of these issues (see, for instance, Freud, 1914, 1958, p. 151).
References
Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Baraitser, L. and Frosh, S. (2007) Affect and encounter in psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Critical Psychology 21: 76–93.
Benjamin, J. (2004) Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 73 (1): 5–46.
Bion, W. (1962, 1984) Learning from Experience. London: Karnac.
Blackman, L. and Cromby, J. (2007) Editorial: Affect and feeling. International Journal of Critical Psychology 21: 5–22.
Blackman, L., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D. and Walkerdine, V. (2008) Creating subjectivities. Subjectivity 22: 1–27.
Bollas, C. (1993) Being a Character. Psychoanalysis and Self-Experience. Hove, UK: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: RKP.
Brennan, T. (2004) The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Burkitt, I. (1997) Social relationships and emotions. Sociology 31 (1): 37–55.
Burkitt, I. (2002) Complex Emotions: Relations, Feelings and Images in Emotional Experience. In: J. Barbalet (ed.) Emotions and Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell with The Sociological Review, pp. 151–167.
Burkitt, I. (2005) Powerful emotions: Power, government and opposition in the ‘war on terror’. Sociology 39 (4): 679–695.
Campbell, J. (2007) Transference, streams of affects and representations. International Journal of Critical Psychology 21: 50–75.
Chodorow, N.J. (1999) The Power of Feelings. Personal Meaning in Psychoanalysis, Gender and Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Clough, P.T. (2007) Introduction. In: P.T. Clough and J. Halley (eds.) The Affective Turn. Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–33.
Clough, P.T. and Halley, J. (eds.) (2007) The Affective Turn. Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Craib, I. (1995) Some comments on the sociology of emotions. Sociology 29 (1): 151–158.
Craib, I. (1997) Social constructionism as social psychosis. Sociology 31 (1): 1–15.
Craib, I. (1998) Experiencing Identity. London: Sage.
Cromby, J. (2007) Toward a psychology of feeling. International Journal of Critical Psychology 21: 94–118.
Elias, N. (1987) On human beings and their emotions: A process-sociological essay. Theory, Culture and Society 4 (2–3): 339–361.
Elkman, P. (1992) Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review 99 (3): 550–553.
Freud, S. (1914, 1958) Remembering, Repeating and Working-Through. In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 147–156.
Gerson, S. (2004) The relational unconscious: A core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness and clinical process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 73 (1): 63–98.
Greenberg, J.R. and Mitchell, S.A. (1983) Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hollway, W. (2006) The Capacity to Care: Gender and Ethical Subjectivity. Hove: Routledge.
Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Loewald, H.W. (ed.) (1980) Psychoanalysis As an Art and the Fantasy Character of the Psychoanalytic Situation. In: Papers in Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 352–371.
Massumi, B. (2002) Parables for the Virtual. Movements, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mauss, M. (1935, 1973) Techniques of the body. Economy and Society 2 (1): 71–88.
Ogden, T.H. (1983) The concept of internal object relations. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 64 (2): 227–241.
Ogden, T.H. (1994) The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 75 (1): 3–19.
Sedgwick, E.K. (2003) Touching Feeling. Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Spezzano, C. (1993) Affect in Psychoanalysis. A Clinical Synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Acknowledgements
This paper is indebted to discussions with Wendy Hollway and other Open University colleagues in the Psycho-Social Reading Group. Thanks also to Simon Forrest, Ann Phoenix and Deborah Steinberg and, for advice on an individual point, to Lynne Layton. Finally, my thanks to Lisa Blackman and two anonymous reviewers for exemplary critical responses to earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redman, P. Affect revisited: Transference–countertransference and the unconscious dimensions of affective, felt and emotional experience. Subjectivity 26, 51–68 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.34
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.34