Skip to main content
Log in

Indian transnational surrogacy and the commodification of vital energy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies allow women to sell the service of gestating a fetus, but maintain little or no claim to the product of that labor: the child itself. In the context of transnational Indian surrogacy, this situation is exacerbated by the physical and cultural distance between intended parents and surrogates. The productive nature of the care and nurturing provided through the work of mothering becomes more visible when viewed though the commodification of commercial surrogacy. Once commodified, this work of care also becomes subject to the alienation of capitalist relations, which invites us to investigate the social and economic implications of the work of mothering in surrogacy. I argue that care and nurture in transnational Indian surrogacy invest human vital energy as a form of value directly into other human beings, through the biological and affective labor involved in surrogate work, thereby supporting the lives of those individuals, families and societies that consume this energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There do exist guidelines for ART clinic practice as of 2005 – see the Indian Council of Medical Research, National Council of Medical Sciences, National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision and Regulation of ART Clinics in India (see http://www.icmr.nic.in/art/art_clinics.htm). There is currently a draft bill regulating ART practices in the Indian Parliament that has not yet passed – the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill, 2008 (http://mohfw.nic.in/Draft%20ART%20(Regulation)%20Bill%20and%20Rules%20-%202008-2.pdf)

  2. All of the names and identifying details of those referred to in this paper have been changed.

  3. For examples of the well-documented relationship of patron and client in India, see Beals, 1974; Dube, 1967; Lewis, 1958; and Pocock, 1962.

  4. See Amrita Pande's work for an elaboration of this sentiment among Indian surrogates.

References

  • Beals, A.R. (1974) Village Life in South India. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (2001) The other kidney: Biopolitics beyond recognition. Body and Society 7: 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, S.C. (1967) Indian Village. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (2001) Ethical biocapital: New strategies of cell culture. In: S. Franklin and M. Lock (eds.) Remaking Life and Death. Santa Fe, Oxford: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamburd, M. (2000) The Kitchen Spoon's Handle: Transnationalism and Sri Lanka's Migrant Housemaids. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, F. and Rapp, R. (1995) Introduction: Conceiving the new world order. In: F. Ginsburg and R. Rapp (eds.) Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, R. (2000) Profit and Pleasure: Sexual Identities in Late Capitalism. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A.R. (1985) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Intimate Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, M. (1999) Maids in space: Gendered domestic labor from Sri Lanka to the Middle East. In: J. Momsen (ed.) Gender, Migration and Domestic Service. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz Rothman, B. (2000) Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, B. (1998) Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2007) Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1958) Village Life in Northern India. New York: Random House Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (2001) The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., Engles, F. and Tucker, R.C. (1978) The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (Forthcoming) At least I am not sleeping with anyone: resisting the stigma of commercial surrogacy in India. Feminist Studies.

  • Parreñas, R.S. (2000) Migrant Filipina domestic labor and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender and Society 14 (4): 560–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas, R.S. (2001) Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, D.F. (1962) Notes on Jajmani relationships. Contributions to Indian Sociology 6: 78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragone, H. (1994) Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO; London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1999) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (1993) With Child in Mind: Studies of the Personal Encounter with Infertility. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (2001) Commodity fetishism in organs trafficking. Body and Society 7 (2/3): 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabile, C. (1998) Shooting the mother: Fetal photography and the politics of disappearance. In: P.A. Treichler, L. Cartwright and C. Penley (eds.) The Visible Woman: Imaging Technologies, Gender, and Science. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1992) After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder Rajan, K. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tadiar, N.X.M. (2004) Fantasy Production: Sexual Economies and Other Philippine Consequences for the New World Order. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; London: Eurospan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teman, E. (2009) Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate and the Body, in press Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Balen, F. and Inhorn, M.C. (2002) Introduction – interpreting infertility: A view from the social sciences. In: M.C. Inhorn and F. Van Balen (eds.) Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vora, K. (2009) Others' organs: South Asian domestic labor and the kidney trade. Postmodern Culture 19: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R. (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vora, K. Indian transnational surrogacy and the commodification of vital energy. Subjectivity 28, 266–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.14

Keywords

Navigation