Skip to main content
Log in

Subjectivity and plant domestication: Decoding the agency of vegetable food crops

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seeds of domesticated plants are a literature, a hard drive and a coded record of past information. Historically speaking, breeding is a special kind of alteration that has made domesticated plants among the most ancient of technical products. In this process of domesticating plants, kinship can be profoundly disrupted and transformed into intellectual property, only to escape, and revert to illicit relationships that are formed in the same agricultural fields that are attempting to tame them. Attention has turned in some quarters to challenging the notions of subjectivity of traditionally ignored subjects. In this paper I want to bring domesticated vegetables to the table. Domesticated plants created by selectionist plant breeding are testimonies to the benefits of cross-species cooperation that have been occurring for generations. Exploring the status of plants as subjects suggests that the controversies surrounding breeding practices need to be reconsidered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Joe is a plant breeder and member of the technical staff at a leading US land-grant university. The comments cited here are taken from a larger qualitative case study of a participatory plant breeding project that sought to breed varieties for the organic and sustainable farming sector.

References

  • Beinart, W. and Middleton, K. (2004) Plant transfers in historical perspective: A review article. Environment and History 10: 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin, C., Baril, A. and Martin, P.A. (2008) Plant diversity in crop fields and woody hedgerows of organic and conventional farms in contrasting landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 123: 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. and Leigh Star, S. (2002) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2006) Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, S. (1992) The Covenant of the Wild: Why Animals Choose Domestication. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1999) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2008) The becomings of subjectivity in animals worlds. Subjectivity 23: 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, Germs and Steel. New York: Norton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1993) Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, B. (1992) The Story of Corn. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997) Modest Witness@Second Millennium. FemaleMan Meets OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1999) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M.B., Degen, M. and Whatmore, S. (2005) Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobhouse, H. (1985) Seeds of Change. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, H. and Kharkwal, M. (eds.) (2004) Plant Breeding: Mendelian to Molecular Approaches. Boston, MA; Dordrecht, the Netherlands; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; Narosa Publishing House.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, J. et al (2001) Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecology Letters 4: 36–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. (1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, C. (2009) Fedco seed catalog, www.fedcoseeds.com.

  • Mayo, O. (1987) The Theory of Plant Breeding. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (1986) Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in the Modern World. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. and Bellon, M. (2004) Plant breeding research: Opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica 136: 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet, J. (2007) How to maintain improved cultivars. Euphytica 153: 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg, I. (1995) Studies to Determine the Intelligence of African Grey Parrots. Proceedings of the International Aviculturists Society; 11–15, January, available online, http://www.funnyfarmexotics.com.IAS/grey-al.htm.

  • Pepperberg, I. (2008) Alex & Me: How a Scientist and a Parrot Uncovered a Hidden World of Animal Intelligence – and Formed a Deep Bond in the Process. New York: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2001) The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1995) The Emergence of Agriculture. New York: Scientific American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoskopf, N. (1993) Plant Breeding: Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, J. (1992) Plant variety protection: An alternative to patents, http://www.nal.usda.gov/pgdic/Probe/v2n2/plant.html.

  • Trut, L. (1999) Early canid domestication: The farm-fox experiment. American Scientist 87 (2): 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, T. (2008) Terminated seed: Death, proprietary kinship and the production of (bio)wealth. Science as Culture 16 (1): 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N. (1992) Origin and Geography of Cultivated Plants. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. and Thorne, L. (1998) Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the geographies of wildlife. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23 (4): 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendum, R. Subjectivity and plant domestication: Decoding the agency of vegetable food crops. Subjectivity 28, 316–333 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.15

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.15

Keywords

Navigation