Original Article

Tourism and Hospitality Research (2009) 9, 185–198. doi:10.1057/thr.2009.9; published online 11 May 2009

Central and Eastern Europe and EU accession 2004: Views of the impact on tourism

Howard L Hughes1 and Danielle Allen2

Correspondence: Howard L. Hughes, Tourism Management, Manchester Metropolitan University, Old Hall Lane, Manchester M14 6HR, UK. E-mail: H.Hughes@mmu.ac.uk

1is Professor of Tourism Management at Manchester Metropolitan University. In addition to three books, he has published many papers on tourist issues relating to culture, the arts, sexuality, destination image and Central and Eastern Europe.

2is Project Associate for the Manchester Metropolitan University study of Central and Eastern Europe. She has experience in arts management, and has conducted extensive research on behalf of the International Tourism Centre at Manchester Metropolitan University.

Received 13 January 2009; Revised 13 January 2009; Published online 11 May 2009.

Top

Abstract

The European Union (EU) was joined by several new members in 2004. Eight of these were Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries that had, at one time, had communist governments and centralised economies. This paper describes a study of tourist board officials' views on the tourism outcomes of the accession and the factors influencing those outcomes. The officials represented the eight CEE countries, and, through individual interviews, their opinions were sought in order to obtain an 'informed' view of post-2004. Predictions for tourism had been optimistic, and these interviewees confirmed that the outcomes had been generally favourable. In particular, they considered that there had been an increased tourism inflow (especially from the United Kingdom) and a shift in the tourism profile towards tourists with wider interests and whose destinations within the countries were more spatially dispersed. Although publicity just before, and at the time of, accession had contributed to this, the most significant influence was believed to have been participation in the EU internal air transport market. The accession of 2004 was, in many respects, less a step-change in economies and in tourism patterns than the culmination of adjustment processes that had been ongoing since the late 1980s. Nonetheless, it was marked by an uplift, the long-term effects of which have yet to be determined.

Keywords:

single market, adjustment, tourism policy

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT