Skip to main content
Log in

Using GIS to develop a performance-based framework for evaluating urban design and crash incidence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although traffic safety is a concern to many urban residents, the role of urban design on crash incidence is typically not considered as part of the transportation planning and design process. Much of the problem stems from the types of performance measures used to analyze traffic safety; most conventional safety analyses focus either on crash performance at high crash, ‘black spot’ locations, or else examine safety at the aggregate scale of the city of metropolitan region. Such approaches not only fail to consider how urban design may influence crash incidence, they fail to provide a framework through which the safety effects of urban design can be understood. Urban design influences the composition and distribution of traffic through a community, establishes locations where different users interact and influences the speeds at which these interactions occur. The effects of such factors are experienced neither at the level of the individual intersection, nor at the level of the region. Such effects are best understood at the level of the individual community. To better account for the effects of urban design on crash incidence, the authors recently sought to develop a geographic information systems (GIS)-based database of crash incidence and urban form for the City of San Antonio, Texas. This article details how GIS may be used to analyze the relationship between urban form and crash incidence at the level of the individual community, including the data sources available for creating such a database, strategies for assembling these data using GIS and opportunities for using such databases to advance professional practice. It is hoped that the methods and techniques detailed in this article will assist planners and urban designers in systematically evaluating the effects of community design on traffic safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 5th edn. Washington DC: Author.

  • Anderson, R.W.G., McLean, A.J., Farmer, M.J.B., Lee, H. and Brooks, C.G. (1997) Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention 29 (5): 667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D.C., Sipe, N.G. and Gleeson, B.J. (2006) Performance-based planning: Perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 396–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Joseph, E. (1995) Livability and Safety of Suburban Street Patterns: A Comparative Study. Working Paper 642. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.

  • Cambridge Systematics. (2000) NCHRP Report 446: A Guidebook for Performance-Based Transportation Planning. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.

  • Dumbaugh, E. (2005a) Safe streets, livable streets. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (3): 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbaugh, E (2005b) Safe streets, livable streets: A positive approach to urban roadside design. Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

  • Dumbaugh, E. (2006) The design of safe urban roadsides. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1961: 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbaugh, E. and Rae, R. (2009) Safe urban form: Revisiting the relationship between community design and traffic safety. Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (3): 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, M. & Pheby, T. (1992) York: aiming to be the UK's first traffic calmed city. Traffic Management and Road Safety. Proceedings of Seminar G, Manchester, 14–18 September 1997, pp. 73–90.

  • Ewing, R. and Dumbaugh, E. (2009) The built environment and traffic safety: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of Planning Literature 23 (4): 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadayeghi, A., Shalaby, A.S. and Persaud, B.N. (2003) Macro level accident prediction models for evaluating safety of urban transportation systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1840: 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirasawa, M. and Asano, M. (1999) Development of traffic analysis system using GIS. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 3: 1193–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladron de Guevara, F., Washington, S.P. and Oh, J. (2004) Forecasting travel crashes at the planning levels: Simultaneous negative binomial crash model applied in Tucson, Arizona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1897: 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, N., Kim, K.E. and Nitz, L.H. (1995a) Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: I. Spatial analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 27 (5): 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, N., Kim, K.E. and Nitz, L.H. (1995b) Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: II. Zonal generators. Accident Analysis and Prevention 27 (5): 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, T. and Fitzroy, S. (2005) Safe Travels: Evaluating Mobility Management Traffic Safety Impacts. Victoria, BC: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, G. and Sayed, T. (2006) Macro-level collision prediction models for evaluating neighbourhood traffic safety. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 33 (5): 609–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. (1957) Subdividing for traffic safety. Traffic Quarterly 11 (3): 308–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossenbruggen, P.J., Pendharkar, J. and Ivan, J. (2001) Roadway safety in rural and small urbanized areas. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33 (4): 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C.A. (1939) Housing for the Machine Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. and Datta, T. (2007) Investigation of regression-to-mean effect in traffic safety evaluation methodologies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2019: 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.K., Graettinger, A.J., Keith, K. and Parrish, A. (2007) Identifying high frequency crash locations: Empowering end users with GIS capabilities. ITE Journal 77 (1): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. (1957) Towards New Towns for America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thommana, J.V. (2006) Traffic accident data analysis: Using geographic information systems based software. ITE Journal on the Web 76 (9): 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board. (2003) Access Management Manual. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.

  • Washington, S., Meyer, M., Van Schalwyk, I., Dumbaugh, E., Mitra, S. and Zoll, M. (2006) NCHRP Report 546: Incorporating Safety into the Long-Range Transportation Planning Process. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dumbaugh, E., Rae, R. & Wunneberger, D. Using GIS to develop a performance-based framework for evaluating urban design and crash incidence. Urban Des Int 16, 63–71 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2010.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2010.16

Keywords

Navigation